Tiger12506 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
It turns out, no, Unicode won't work, but using x\99 for the TM
character
does, at least on my system (no idea if this will be universal):
That's strange. Windows is Unicode based!
Unicode is effective at the font level. You need to have a font that
Hi,
I have been working with easydialogs module lately especially the progress
bar (for Windows). I would like to put superscript text like (TM) to (™)
when calling the label function. I have been looking around the net for some
info, and can not find anything about it . It makes me wonder if
Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I have been working with easydialogs module lately
especially the progress bar (for Windows). I would
like to put superscript text like (TM) to (™) when
calling the label function.
To do that you will have to use rich text format for the label
text and that's not
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Alan Gauld wrote:
Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I have been working with easydialogs module lately
especially the progress bar (for Windows). I would
like to put superscript text like (TM) to (?) when
calling the label function.
The super-scripting is controlled by
Terry Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
like to put superscript text like (TM) to (T) when
calling the label function.
font settings etc. You may be able to find a font that
supports TM as a superscript specifically within its
extended charater set.
I don't know easydialogs, but could
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Alan Gauld wrote:
The problem is I don't know whether Windows supports unicode(I suspect
it does nowadays) and if it does whether EasyDialogs supports changing
the system font.
I think EasyDialogs is a Mac thing.
___
Tutor
Terry Carroll wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Alan Gauld wrote:
The problem is I don't know whether Windows supports unicode(I suspect
it does nowadays) and if it does whether EasyDialogs supports changing
the system font.
I think EasyDialogs is a Mac thing.
Ben mentioned Windows
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Luke Paireepinart wrote:
Ben mentioned Windows specifically in his original post.
I think that's why Alan was talking about it.
Ah. I missed that, thanks.
Well, in that case, since I use Windows, I can give it a shot instead of
guessing.
It turns out, no, Unicode won't
It turns out, no, Unicode won't work, but using x\99 for the TM character
does, at least on my system (no idea if this will be universal):
That's strange. Windows is Unicode based! All text operations done in
Windows are first converted to unicode, calculated, and then back. That's
even been
