Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm not sure I like this. If we have several stamps (e.g. the
fruit stamps) they should scale by the *same* amount, not by
an integer ratio. If I have understood things correctly, your
code means that an apple may look larger
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 14:59, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
The outlines shown when placing a stamp doesn't work as well as
before (both for unscaled and scaled stamps).
I've noticed.
Rather than fixing it, I think the outline code should
be redone. As noted by a #define option, the current
code
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:11:03PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Unless someone objects, I'll add a feature request for this to the
SF tracker.
It seems complicated. :-(
On the contrary. I like the idea of a slider over the Grow/Shrink
(up-arrow/down-arrow) buttons we have now.
Those
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:14:28PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
In the *.dat file, you put a line like one of these:
Albert, can you please add some documentation on this new feature
inside docs/html/README.html?
(Or, if you'd rather not, just give me a good summary, and I can stick
it in
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 20:12, Bill Kendrick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:11:03PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Unless someone objects, I'll add a feature request for this to the
SF tracker.
It seems complicated. :-(
On the contrary. I like the idea of a slider over the
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I support that, but it goes the other way. While I would
have done the direction you chose, our opinions are not
terribly important. We know about software development.
My wife, mostly a non-programmer, would use 2.5 for that.
