I can't think of another merged spinoff but there are a lot of uncomfortable cross overs of incompatible shows. NBC's storm night comes to mind and not in a good way.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:49 AM, <tvornottv@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Today's Topic Summary > > Group: http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/topics > > - CW's Wonder Woman TV series synopsis<#13b5b05894f24927_group_thread_0>[7 > Updates] > - And the latest celebrity to divorce after authoring a book on family > and relationships is... <#13b5b05894f24927_group_thread_1> [2 Updates] > - Maria Von Trapp 2013: Carrie > Underwood<#13b5b05894f24927_group_thread_2>[5 Updates] > - NewsCorp close to deal with Yankees' TV > channel<#13b5b05894f24927_group_thread_3>[1 Update] > - One Part iCarly + One Part Victorious > =<#13b5b05894f24927_group_thread_4>[1 Update] > > CW's Wonder Woman TV series > synopsis<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/c0c2b897bc57f729> > > "Kevin M." <drunkbastar...@gmail.com> Dec 01 12:19PM -0800 > > Ugh, sigh, and ugh again. The sentence that makes me want to vomit is > this > one, "People aren't looking for characters who have their act together > and > represent some unrealistic image of success and perfection. Rather, > they > relate to the journey of self-discovery..." Couldn't be farther from > the > truth in my case. I'm sick of f-ing "origin" stories. They are frankly > too > easy and too simplistic. The whole idea of superheroes is they are > larger > than life figure who embody the best in us -- they are not people we > can > relate to -- they are people we should constantly aspire to be. But > Hollywood doesn't like that concept, preferring to deconstruct > perfection > and find flaws where there aren't any. > > > > http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/729638/wonder-woman-tv-series-plot-details/ > > -- > Kevin M. (RPCV) > > > > > Jim Ellwanger <train...@ellwanger.tv> Dec 01 12:54PM -0800 > > On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Kevin M. wrote: > > > The sentence that makes me want to vomit is this one, "People aren't > looking for characters who have their act together and represent some > unrealistic image of success and perfection. Rather, they relate to the > journey of self-discovery..." > > I stopped at this: "...DC Comics' bikini-clad..." > > I have examined Wonder Woman's costume in great detail, and I can tell > you that it's not a bikini. > > -- > Jim Ellwanger <train...@ellwanger.tv> > <http://www.ellwanger.tv> > > > > > Bob in Jersey <bob.in.jer...@juno.com> Dec 01 01:05PM -0800 > > Do we thank *Spider-Man* in all its various forms for this mindset? -- > BOB > > > > > "Kevin M." <drunkbastar...@gmail.com> Dec 01 05:25PM -0800 > > > > Do we thank *Spider-Man* in all its various forms for this mindset? > -- > > BOB > > > All of the recent franchises that insist on starting over are to > thank/blame. I concede, as a writer it is difficult to write for an > invulnerable character, but the trick is to have compelling supporting > characters who can advance a storyline. The Bond and Batman franchises > learned quickly to make it about the villains and the love interests, > but I > don't think any version of Superman has ever quite nailed that idea > (though > Lois and Clark probably came closest of all the on screen adaptations). > > I am not really a Marvel guy, so I've always struggled with Spidey and > the > Avengers and the X-Men. I thought Jennifer Garner looked amazing as > Elektra, but that's all I can really say about that character. > > I get it. All superheroes were awkward youths who were > different/isolated, > then fate/destiny/radiation played a role, and now they are imbued with > superhuman abilities. Got it. Check. Understood. All points registered. > Now, MOVE ON and tell a compelling story with all of that backstory as > a > given. There is no need to make the backstory into the main story. To > keep > doing so is just laziness on everybody's part. > -- > Kevin M. (RPCV) > > > > > David Bruggeman <bru...@yahoo.com> Dec 01 06:38PM -0800 > > The Man of Steel movie will put Superman through this process next > year. With A-listers cast for Supe's parents, it's seems likely that > origin story will take a significant part of the film. And while Zack > Snyder is directing, both Christopher Nolan and David Goyer are involved. > > David > > > > > > > > PGage <pga...@gmail.com> Dec 01 10:46PM -0800 > > > learned quickly to make it about the villains and the love > interests, but I > > don't think any version of Superman has ever quite nailed that idea > (though > > Lois and Clark probably came closest of all the on screen > adaptations). > > I don't really agree with you Kevin here in general, and in particular > I > disagree about Bond - at least in its latest (and, with all due > respect to > Sir Sean, the best) incarnation, there has been quite a bit of focus on > Bond and his backstory, to wonderful effect. In Skyfall there is also > quite a bit of attention paid to the villan's backstory, and they have > been > quite transparent about trying to make his villainy interior, not > exterior. > > I know a lot of folks on this list are real comic book guys; I am not > (when > I was 10 I walked to the corner liquor store and bought 5 comic books > with > my saved up allowance; my mom threw a fit and forbade me from ever > reading > them. Unlike lots of kids I guess, I listened to my mother). I only > ever > got interested in superheros when they started paying attention to the > backstory and the psychology (though my understanding is that there is > a > lot of that in both the Batman and Spiderman comics anyway?). > > > > > "Kevin M." <drunkbastar...@gmail.com> Dec 01 11:12PM -0800 > > > quite a bit of attention paid to the villan's backstory, and they > have been > > quite transparent about trying to make his villainy interior, not > exterior. > > > I thought I was clear that Bond was one of the few exceptions > inasmuch as > they rebooted the franchise but they made it work. Same with Batman, > and > they do so largely by granting the premise the hero will prevail and > focusing on telling a compelling story of how he will prevail. I don't > care > if Bond got beaten up as child or that he never got the bicycle he > wanted > for Christmas, and I like that Bond doesn't seem to care about those > things, either. Not to spoil Skyfall for anyone, but by the end of the > film, Bond IS Bond, and if you look at the three Daniel Craig movies, > there > wasn't all that much origin in there, yet audiences were still able to > see > him evolve into the ultimate secret agent. They were able to do it > without > showing Bond's parents dying, or Bond getting recruited into MI-6, or > Bond's first clumsy attempt to seduce a woman or thwart a villain. We > didn't see Bond's novice angst, though we did see him mature in a more > subtle manner. And you can't say the same about Reeve as Superman or > Spider-Man or the individual Avengers films or the Burton Batman, > where we > had to have every moment of vulnerability rammed so far down our > throats > that we expelled them gaseously. > > > > backstory and the psychology (though my understanding is that there > is a > > lot of that in both the Batman and Spiderman comics anyway?). > > > The only reason the comics seem to pay attention to backstory is that > whenever a new writer takes over a book (or a character), he seems > intent > on reimagining the origin. Then there is DC's much maligned reboot of > their > entire line of comics which has annoyed a lot of longtime readers. In > comic > world, the best selling books seem to be when superheroes either team > up or > fight each other, and no origin is needed for either of those concepts. > > I don't mind looking at the psychology of the heroes, but one doesn't > need > to start over EVERY TIME in order to gaze into the mind of a hero. At > this > stage, anybody who needs to know the beginnings of a character who has > existed for decades can Google it. To keep rehashing the same moment > of a > character's life is sloppy writing and not very creative. > > -- > Kevin M. (RPCV) > > > > And the latest celebrity to divorce after authoring a book on family > and relationships > is...<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/f1a07ee57d602027> > > "Kevin M." <drunkbastar...@gmail.com> Dec 01 03:34PM -0800 > > Bialik appeared with the Scottish Conan Guy last night. She was > obviously > not a regular watcher of the show, and there were obviously a lot of > off-limits topics (no mention of divorce or of her theories on > parenting). > Not awkward, but she struggled to play along. > -- > Kevin M. (RPCV) > > > > > David Bruggeman <bru...@yahoo.com> Dec 01 06:29PM -0800 > > Hmm. Haven't seen it yet, but I'm guessing she either didn't talk > about Craig with her co-stars (who have all been on the show), or their > efforts were basically encouraging her to appear. > > David > > > > > > > Maria Von Trapp 2013: Carrie > Underwood<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/296691ab70fa07c0> > > Jon Delfin <jondel...@gmail.com> Dec 01 07:30AM -0500 > > Didn't Fantasia do a stint in "The Color Purple"? > > > > > > > "Melissa P" <takingupspace...@gmail.com> Dec 01 08:16AM -0500 > > Not to mention Tamyra Gray, Jordin Sparks, Taylor Hicks, and DeGarmo’s > fiancé, who’ve also done Broadway. > > From: tvornottv@googlegroups.com [mailto:tvornottv@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of M-D November > Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 1:36 AM > To: tvornottv@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Maria Von Trapp 2013: Carrie Underwood > > > > And don't forget AI DQ-turned-Voice finalist Frenchie Davis. After the > whole Idol to-do, she had a three year stint in "Rent" and went on to > do a > number of other productions. > > On Friday, November 30, 2012 11:47:14 PM UTC-5, MelissaP wrote: > > Make that three who “have at least some cred from musical theater > fans”: > > > > From today: > > > > http://www.playbill.com/news/article/172748-THE-SCREENING-ROOM-Happy-Birthda > y-Clay-Aiken-Video > > > > (And Carrie needs to work on her phrasing.) > > > > Despite all of Simon Cowell's "this isn't 'Cabaret Idol,' this is > 'American > Idol'" pronouncements, at least three "Idol" Top12ers have appeared on > Broadway and Constantine Maroulis and Diana DeGarmo have at least some > cred > from musical theater fans. > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en > > > > > Bob in Jersey <bob.in.jer...@juno.com> Dec 01 12:52PM -0800 > > Melissa, to Mark J, in part: > > > > > http://www.playbill.com/news/article/172748-THE-SCREENING-ROOM-Happy-Birthday-Clay-Aiken-Video > > Tuesday, at a sold-out Musikfest Café, Bethlehem, PA. > > Aside: Does anyone know what exactly they call those National Park > Service > people who stand at exhibits inside parks, monuments, etc., and tell > applicable stories? > > -- BOB > > > > > Jim Ellwanger <train...@ellwanger.tv> Dec 01 12:55PM -0800 > > On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Bob in Jersey wrote: > > > Aside: Does anyone know what exactly they call those National Park > Service people who stand at exhibits inside parks, monuments, etc., and > tell applicable stories? > > They are rangers, even if they don't do much ranging. > > "Interpretation" is one part of the ranger job description. > > -- > Jim Ellwanger <train...@ellwanger.tv> > <http://www.ellwanger.tv> > > > > > Bob in Jersey <bob.in.jer...@juno.com> Dec 01 01:06PM -0800 > > Jim Ellwanger, to moi: > > > They are rangers, even if they don't do much ranging. > > > "Interpretation" is one part of the ranger job description. > > OK, that was my first guess... thanks. -- BOB > > > > NewsCorp close to deal with Yankees' TV > channel<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/ba3b9912d5ae72a9> > > Bob in Jersey <bob.in.jer...@juno.com> Dec 01 12:47PM -0800 > > Joe Hass, to moi, in part: > > profits from Yes and minimizing their risk for the obvious sports > rights > > bubble popping that's coming. > > > Can we consider them as the sports equivalent of rightie big-mouths > like > Beck and Limbaugh? > > > > The pop's comin' folks. And it's going to destroy organized sports > as we > > know it. Except for the NFL: they'll kill themselves because > football will > > die. > > I'll bet there are still people in this nation who think pro athletes > should have to work "normal" jobs in the offseason. > > -- BOB > > > > One Part iCarly + One Part Victorious > =<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/21312df47fc38e91> > > Joe Hass <hassgoc...@gmail.com> Dec 01 08:23AM -0600 > > a new show called "Sam & Cat" featuring 19-year-old Ariana Grande and > 20-year-old Jennette McCurdy as teenage babysitters. > > > > http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/icarly-victorious-spinoff-sam-cat-395824 > > But that's not why I'm posting this. > > Can anyone think of a spinoff that merged two different shows together > like this? > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group > tvornottv. > You can post via email <tvornottv@googlegroups.com>. > To unsubscribe from this group, > send<tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>an empty message. > For more options, visit <http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/topics>this > group. > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en > -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en