BET failing to read the room
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/oj-simpson-bet-awards-memoriam-blasted-just-wrong-families-nicole-brow-rcna159825
Kevin M. (RPCV)
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 7:56 PM PGage wrote:
> It is fascinating that after three decades it is still hard to have a
>
It is fascinating that after three decades it is still hard to have a
reasonable discussion about this case. FWIW, my view is he probably did
kill his wife. I just hate how the criminal jury has been maligned over the
years as either too stupid to understand the DNA evidence, or to biased to
The jurors in the criminal trial had no choice but to find OJ not guilty
based on the evidence actually presented, as well as the way in which the
evidence was presented. The sequestered jury members did not see everything
the rest of us saw. Reasonable dedicated viewers of the circus all
There’s no reason to try and relitigate the case. It stands, and is
meaningful, that in the almost 30 years after the case no exonerating
evidence or even an alternate theory of how the murders happened.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:17 PM PGage wrote:
> Well, the Civil Jury found him liable for
Well, the Civil Jury found him liable for the deaths.
But, to my point, that jury was quite different than the LA criminal jury.
The criminal jury knew things about the LAPD that made the accusations of
planting evidence and covering up even the most extreme police wrongdoing
reasonable, though
A civil jury found he caused the deaths.
Who is the legal expert?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024, 6:59 PM PGage wrote:
> From Prostate Cancer.
>
> We have an OJ trial expert on the list, so I will not attempt to sum up or
> draw conclusions, though I too watched a lot of that trial.
>
> I will just say
>From Prostate Cancer.
We have an OJ trial expert on the list, so I will not attempt to sum up or
draw conclusions, though I too watched a lot of that trial.
I will just say this: while I do not object to obituary stories saying
evidence presented at the criminal trial appeared to indicate he
