I don’t think there is any reason to establish a standard that a news
network should only contain straight news. That has never been the
expectation for newspapers. The problem with Rachel is not that she
delivers opinion, but that she delivers opinion and news reporting, without
even much of an at
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 7:21 PM PGage wrote:
> I am not sure what premise you find absurd. My point is simply 1) MSNBC
> has never been as liberal as Fox is conservative and 2) Changes at MSNBC
> are going to result in it being even less liberal. I think both of those
> things really are undeniab
I am not sure what premise you find absurd. My point is simply 1) MSNBC has
never been as liberal as Fox is conservative and 2) Changes at MSNBC are
going to result in it being even less liberal. I think both of those things
really are undeniably true.
Perhaps you mean that none of that matters, a
This is all an absurd premise. The gathering of information, reporting of
facts, and contextual analysis can all be done in a nonpartisan way. The
fact MSNBC isn’t as guilty of partisanship as Fox is not an excuse.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:48 AM M-D November wrote:
>
> We can only hope this is
We can only hope this is more of a balancing act and less an act of 'both
sides'-ism (TM Don Lemon).
On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 9:09:50 AM UTC-5 PGage wrote:
> I prefer straight news of course. But MSNBC has never been an equally but
> opposite ideologically slanted operation to Fox, and
