[TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2010-01-01 Thread colonial
Meanwhile, New York-area cable provider Cablevision has booted Food Network and HGTV from its lineup due to a similar dispute with Scripps... http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/01/news/companies/cablevision_scripps/index.htm On Dec 31 2009, 5:16 pm, Kevin M. drunkbastar...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu,

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2010-01-01 Thread Steve Rhodes
Hollywood Reporter (I'm sure more details will come out soon): After an all-night negotiation session and two extensions, Fox and Time Warner Cable on Friday afternoon announced that they have agreed in principle to a comprehensive distribution agreement that would keep the Fox owned and operated

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2010-01-01 Thread Doug Eastick
perhaps they can share the deal details with canada 'casters. they've been fighting with cableco's and satellite co's for 1-2 years now. www.localTVmatters.ca I'm tired of hearing of the battle. On 1/1/10 7:53 PM, Steve Rhodes wrote: Hollywood Reporter (I'm sure more details will come out

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2010-01-01 Thread terry
: Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway? perhaps they can share the deal details with canada 'casters. they've been fighting with cableco's and satellite co's for 1-2 years now. www.localTVmatters.ca I'm tired of hearing of the battle. On 1/1/10 7:53 PM, Steve Rhodes wrote

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2010-01-01 Thread Doug Eastick
orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway? perhaps they can share the deal details with canada 'casters. they've been fighting with cableco's and satellite co's for 1-2 years now. www.localTVmatters.ca I'm tired of hearing of the battle. On 1/1/10 7:53 PM, Steve Rhodes wrote

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2010-01-01 Thread terry
*Subject: *Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway? perhaps they can share the deal details with canada 'casters. they've been fighting with cableco's and satellite co's for 1-2 years now. www.localTVmatters.ca I'm tired of hearing of the battle. On 1/1/10 7:53 PM, Steve Rhodes wrote

[TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-31 Thread Wrecks
Last night Kuma asked me to set up a recording of Sara Palin on The O'Reilly Factor, only I discovered that it isn't broadcast on our local Fox station. Apparently they do local news at that time. -- TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-31 Thread jeffrey marousek
since i am on vacation i am not going to log into my work computers to look at this, but this list makes no sense... azteca is a partially a privately owned network, with a big portion of it still in receievrship following the pappas bankruptcy food network is a scripps howard network, and it

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-31 Thread televisiongirl
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Kevin M. drunkbastar...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, FoxNews has a different deal? Yes, and they are running a crawl on the screen that FOX News and FOX Business News are not impacted by the FOX/TWC spat. As a non-TWC subscriber, I thought it was odd to see

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-31 Thread Jason Carpio
So is this going to happen tomorrow? I already bought my antenna. On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 4:12 PM, televisiongirl televisiong...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Kevin M. drunkbastar...@gmail.comwrote: Apparently, FoxNews has a different deal? Yes, and they are running a

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-31 Thread Kevin M.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Jason Carpio jcar...@gmail.com wrote: So is this going to happen tomorrow? I already bought my antenna. Depends on what either side means by a cooling off period. Sounds to me like it is corporate America's time of the month.

[TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-30 Thread stan
I've seen conflicting reports as to whether this will only apply to OOs carried by Time Warner Cable or if it will be any Fox affiliate carried by TWC. What's the current story? -- TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-30 Thread terry
Its only oo on twc my fox in kc is an affil And ok from twc Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: stan sta...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:16:27 To: TVorNotTVtvornottv@googlegroups.com Subject: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-30 Thread Dino R. Alexander
To: tvornottv@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway? Its only oo on twc my fox in kc is an affil And ok from twc Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: stan sta...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:16:27

Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-30 Thread Kevin M.
Copied and pasted from Aaron Barnhart's coverage of the story (or non-story, as I'm convinced someone will cave in or chicken out), here is the list of cable channels which could theoretically go away from TW subscribers: Azteca America,E! Entertainment Television,Encore,Encore Action,Encore

[TV orNotTV] Re: Who needs to watch FOX anyway?

2009-12-30 Thread Bob in Jersey
Uhhh, how did all those Comcast, Liberty, and Scripps networks get tossed into this salad? (Yes, I realize their contracts probably all end at the same time... but you can't ASS-ume they're all having issues like SnoozeCorp) -- TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People! You received this