in season.
>>> Politically Incorrect was, to my recollection, never a single topic a day
>>> show. If a celebrity wasn't up to speed on one topic, there were usually
>>> 2-3 others they might chime in about. I think going more toward Real Time,
>>> while
>> while drawing from a different pool of experts, can be more effective.
>>
>> It seems clear that the show has better luck with panels on certain
>> topics than others. I think it would be fine if they didn't do a panel
>> every night. If they can't get
f experts, can be more effective.
>>
>> It seems clear that the show has better luck with panels on certain topics
>> than others. I think it would be fine if they didn't do a panel every
>> night. If they can't get the guests, skip the panel. If you can't find
>>
than others. I think it would be fine if they didn't do a panel every
> night. If they can't get the guests, skip the panel. If you can't find
> enough, throw in a correspondent if it makes sense.
>
> David
>
> ------------------
> *From:* PGage
So I just watched the one on the legalization of marijuana, which is the
prototype of a panel approach that does NOT work. They are stepping all
over each other, and on Wilmore's punchlines, and the whole thing is an
uninteresting and embarrassing mess. If they had done that show with the
Columbia
d
From: PGage
To: "tvornottv@googlegroups.com"
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Review: The Nightly Show
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Steve Timko wrote:
They have broken format routinely for the past week or so. Any guesses as to
whet
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Steve Timko wrote:
> They have broken format routinely for the past week or so. Any guesses as
> to whether they are permanently going with the flexible format or are they
> trying to see what sticks?
>
I have noticed that (though I am down to sampling the show on
his week.
>
>http://www.cc.com/shows/the-nightly-show/contributors
>David
>
> From: PGage
> To: "tvornottv@googlegroups.com"
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 5:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Review: The Nightly Show
>
>
>
>I don't know what
tp://www.cc.com/shows/the-nightly-show/contributors
David
From: PGage
To: "tvornottv@googlegroups.com"
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Review: The Nightly Show
I don't know what will come of the round table segments - in general, I
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:15 PM, M-D November wrote:
> I'm reserving judgement for a few weeks until Wilmore and his team have a
> chance to work out the kinks. But so far I like what I see.
>
> Re: the act 1 "anchorlogue", it wasn't uncommon for Stewart and Colbert to
> hit many of the same not
ing in under my radar. I may not laugh as hard as with Stewart or
Colbert, but I enjoy Wilmore all the same.
David
From: M-D November
To: tvornottv@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 11:15 PM
Subject: [TV orNotTV] Review: The Nightly Show
I'm reserving judgement f
I'm reserving judgement for a few weeks until Wilmore and his team have a
chance to work out the kinks. But so far I like what I see.
Re: the act 1 "anchorlogue", it wasn't uncommon for Stewart and Colbert to hit
many of the same notes (if not tell outright identical jokes), so I'm not
surpris
No reviews of “The Nightly Show.” Isn’t anyone watching it?
It looks okay coming out of the gate. I’m willing to give him a few months
to get his bearings. Right now it’s a “The Daily Show” opening followed by
a kind of “Politically Incorrect” second and third segments.
I wonder if having the openi
13 matches
Mail list logo
