.
> Varney on FBC?).
>
> --
> *From:* M-D November >
>
> *Subject:* Re: [TV orNotTV] The Post-Dave Late Show (from The NBC Stars'
> Revenge)
>
> Oliver is an interesting option for the post-Dave "Late Show", but it does
&
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:43 PM, M-D November wrote:
> (SNIP)That brings us back to the Late Show - assuming Ferguson doesn't
> want 11:35, there isn't another experienced late night host with
> established material ready to sit in Dave's chair. Oliver brings
> experience in the medium through
Both are American citizens, unlike the git on CNN at 9 (and maybe even Mr.
Varney on FBC?).
>
> From: M-D November
>
>Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] The Post-Dave Late Show (from The NBC Stars' Revenge)
>
>
>
>Oliver is an interesting o
Oliver is an interesting option for the post-Dave "Late Show", but it does
beg the question whether a late-night blocked helmed by f'rrners. I mean,
I'm a huge fan of both Oliver and Ferguson, but...to use a hugely worn-out
cliche, will it play in Peoria? (Or, I suppose, really, Omaha or Topeka
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Joe Hass wrote:
> Here I disagree, because the brand is Dave and not "The Late Show" as
> evidenced by the fact that its been almost 20 years now and everyone still
> slips occasionally and calls it "Late Night". "The Tonight Show" was a
> brand. The unknown goes
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Joe Hass wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:44 AM, PGage wrote:
>
>> I have not seen or read everything that Dave has said (there is an
>> obvious expert on this here and I will wait with the rest for the
>> definitive word), but I have seen and read a lot, and
ially connected to WWP or either host, but it's out there for consideration.Doug FieldsTampa, FL
Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [TV orNotTV] The Post-Dave Late Show (from The NBC Stars'
Revenge)
From: <d...@flids.net>
Date: Tue, June 11, 2013 1:31 pm
To: tvornot
I've heard that theory mentioned before, but I've never once heard it from Dave or Craig, or anybody associated with them in any official capacity.Doug FieldsTampa, FL
Original Message
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] The Post-Dave Late Show (from The NBC Stars'
Rev
Correct me if I'm mistaken, but doesn't SCG get first dibs/right of first
refusal at 11:35 per his most recent contract? (I know Craig has said he
doesn't WANT 11:35, but technically he's got the right to it.)
On Monday, June 10, 2013 11:33:32 PM UTC-4, PGage wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:44 AM, PGage wrote:
> I have not seen or read everything that Dave has said (there is an obvious
> expert on this here and I will wait with the rest for the definitive word),
> but I have seen and read a lot, and I do not recall him expressing an
> opinion about who wou
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Joe Hass wrote:
> This is outstanding. Thank you. Here's my one follow-up. Assume that Host
> Dave decides to retire (at the end of whatever contract that might be) and
> WWP and CBS agrees to continue their deal. Has Dave ever indicated that
> he'd look at the ne
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Doug Fields wrote:
> A…and you were doing so well, until you fell into the trap halfway
> through your message where you subconsciously switched from Late Show to
> Late Night. J
>
>
>
I blame the pinheads at GE for that...
--
--
TV or Not TV The
This is outstanding. Thank you. Here's my one follow-up. Assume that Host Dave
decides to retire (at the end of whatever contract that might be) and WWP and
CBS agrees to continue their deal. Has Dave ever indicated that he'd look at
the new person as either "the second host of The Late Show" or
L
From: tvornottv@googlegroups.com [mailto:tvornottv@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of PGage
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:34 PM
To: tvornottv@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] The Post-Dave Late Show (from The NBC Stars'
Revenge)
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Joe Hass
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Joe Hass wrote:
> I over-generalized with the word "owns". Your interpretation is correct.
> My core question is which of these three statements is the most accurate:
> A. There's one contract that covers Dave and WWP, and it runs through 2014.
> B. There are two
I over-generalized with the word "owns". Your interpretation is correct. My
core question is which of these three statements is the most accurate:
A. There's one contract that covers Dave and WWP, and it runs through 2014.
B. There are two contracts (one for Dave, one for WWP) that run
concurrently
preference for a successor, I've never heard anything beyond second- and third-hand rumors. Not that that necessarily means anything, but I do try to keep up with stuff like that.Doug FieldsTampa, FL
---- Original Message ----
Subject: [TV orNotTV] The Post-Dave Late Show (from The NBC St
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Diner wrote:
>
> He mentioned on Fallon the other night that he'll be moving to NYC when
> HIMYM ends next year.
> Anybody else think CBS might want to have him take over the Late Show when
> Dave retires?
>
This comment triggered a different thought. Obviously
18 matches
Mail list logo
