On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
> I asked, and ITA seems willing to provide a conference room or two with
> Internet for sprinters. I will try for official signoff given more
> details like dates and # of people.
Great. Thanks for setting this up.
___
I asked, and ITA seems willing to provide a conference room or two with
Internet for sprinters. I will try for official signoff given more
details like dates and # of people.
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twiste
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Nida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I noticed that you are on the twisted words mailing list and it says that
> you are the maintainer too, so I was hoping I could ask you a few questions:
> I would like to use the twisted words oscar protocols.
> I am trying to use the o
Hey,
Thanks for the quick response, this is exactly what I am looking for
am works great.
Thanks again
Regards
David
On 20 Jul 2009, at 13:36, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:26 AM, David Guerin
wrote:
Hey all,
I'm pretty new to Twisted Framework but things are goi
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:26 AM, David Guerin wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm pretty new to Twisted Framework but things are going along nicely.
> At the moment I am trying to get a timer to fire off say every 5
> minutes.
> What's the best way to do this with twisted?
> I found an old link to a how to
Hey all,
I'm pretty new to Twisted Framework but things are going along nicely.
At the moment I am trying to get a timer to fire off say every 5
minutes.
What's the best way to do this with twisted?
I found an old link to a how to with timers in twisted on the
twistedmatrix.com site but ther
Hello everyone,
I have been experiencing the ConnectionError with adbapi &
cp_reconnect=True. I know that because of the cp_reconnect=True param
tha is reconnects and that the query is not re-run. I have written some
code that should re-run the query in that case (if I get a Failure back
becau
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Ilya Etingof wrote:
> Isn't this call priority policy appears somewhat rigid and obscure?
>
> Would it be clearer if user would be allowed to assign relative
> weights to his/her receiption and timer functions so that main loop
> could choose what to call in case
>> Perhaps it works that way. And what makes things worse is that if datagram
>> input rate is steady and higher than datagram processing time, the
>> LoopingCall calls will never be invoked.
>
> It will eventually stop reading datagrams and go do something else. The
> exact way it decides when t
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> Fascinating though the topic is, I very much doubt I'll have any time to
> even look at it.
>
A familiar refrain.
That said; is there a reactor "performance" test?
Hmm. No, not really. It would be helpful to develop one, I think.
Especial
>
> I know what you mean. If you trawl through my really old blog posts
> (I think the one I'm thinking of is on livejournal, but I can't find
> it quickly) you'll see that I've thought about this before. The two
> main deterrents to changing the reactor to be a set of abstract
> "events" placed
11 matches
Mail list logo
