twisted-...@udmvt.ru wrote:
[...]
> Is it true, that adding many callback functions as filters is elegant,
> but impractical solution?
> Since there is only a [linear] list of pairs (callback, errback), the last
> errbacks
> have to be complex to distinguish the failures, that came from the previo
top o' the mornin' to all
willfix. need a few days yet, but i'll correct the outstanding issues,
forward-merge my branch, and try to cross every T and dot every I and
maybe someone will just unmerge the whole thing for me in the
mean-time.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:31 AM, wrote:
> Ticket [#3078
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 05:46:08PM -0500, Terry Jones wrote:
> > "Michael" == Michael P Soulier writes:
>
> Michael> I'm a bit confused as to the "visual explanation". It seems like
> Michael> if you have a single callback and errback, that if the errback
> Michael> wants to swallow the error
