Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> I think we should give screwtape an SVN account and make him an official
> reviewer. He's been doing a lot of work on the distutils code which would be
> made easier by that, and he's been doing pretty decent reviews.
+1
I've been thinking (and occasionally saying) this
+2
On 10 Jun 2010, at 00:49, Kevin Horn wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
> wrote:
> I think we should give screwtape an SVN account and make him an official
> reviewer. He's been doing a lot of work on the distutils code which would be
> made easier by that, a
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 06:25:05PM -0400, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> I think we should give screwtape an SVN account and make him an
> official reviewer. He's been doing a lot of work on the distutils
> code which would be made easier by that, and he's been doing pretty
> decent reviews.
Well, this
+1
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> I think we should give screwtape an SVN account and make him an official
> reviewer. He's been doing a lot of work on the distutils code which would
> be made easier by that, and he's been doing pretty decent reviews.
>
> Thoughts? (Fe
I think we should give screwtape an SVN account and make him an official
reviewer. He's been doing a lot of work on the distutils code which would be
made easier by that, and he's been doing pretty decent reviews.
Thoughts? (Feel free to voice any comments off-list, too.)
_
On Jun 9, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Ray Cote wrote:
> So, one positive vote for removing 2.4 support in Windows.
> I prefer your Windows support be focused moving forward to 2.7.
Since Ray was the first sponsor of 2010, as well as a silver sponsor - see the
AppropriateSolutions logo on the front pag
We have quite a bit of Twisted/Windows code and it has all been ported over to
2.5 or 2.6.
I find it easier to upgrade Pythons on Windows since the bulk of our Windows
products are shipped as py2exe containing their own interpreter. Cleaner than
dealing with CentOS (for example) which has 2.4
On Jun 9, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Kevin Horn wrote:
> It would be nice to keep it if possible, but if it's a choice between a
> buildslave for 2.4 and one for 2.7, then 2.7 really needs to take priority.
Well, you can make it possible by volunteering the hardware :). I just don't
think we should thi
I dont know if twisted can really be counted as a scheduler. Its purpose is
more to do with nonblocking IO. To improve IO performance in stackless you
would need to add multiplexing to its scheduler(if it doesnt already have
it). http://eventlet.net/ seems to to this.
Dan
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9
Me 3. Existing apps wont likely care about new features and if they
need then upgrade to 2.5 is fully backwards compatible
2010/6/9, Glyph Lefkowitz :
>
> On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:20 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>
>> I would like to propose that after Twisted 10.1 is released, we cease to
>>
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:20 PM, wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I would like to propose that after Twisted 10.1 is released, we cease to
> claim support for Python 2.4 on any version of Windows. This seems
> reasonable to me considering that Python 2.5 was first released in
> September of 2006 and that e
On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:20 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> I would like to propose that after Twisted 10.1 is released, we cease to
> claim support for Python 2.4 on any version of Windows. This seems
> reasonable to me considering that Python 2.5 was first released in
> September of 200
Hi Folks:
My talk "Prototyping Go's Select for Stackless with Stackless.py" recently got
accepted to EuroPython. In the talk, I modified stackless.py to support the Go
language's Select statement. I support Select as a method rather than a Python
language feature. Implementing Select turns out
13 matches
Mail list logo
