Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and PEP 3148 support

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:15:59AM -, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: > On 01:54 am, screwt...@froup.com wrote: > >- Futures support cancellation; Twisted finally managed to get rid > > of cancellation support in Deferreds. > > We only got rid of Deferred.setTimeout. In exchange, we

Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and PEP 3148 support

On 01:54 am, screwt...@froup.com wrote: Just a couple quick (minor) factual corrections. I'll snip everything that does not appear to need correction (of which there was a lot) to make it easier to read. >- Futures support cancellation; Twisted finally managed to get rid > of cancellat

Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and PEP 3148 support

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:57:14PM +0200, Alex Grönholm wrote: > The main focus of the discussion is to figure out how to best integrate > support for this new API to Twisted. If possible, existing protocols > should remain compatible through the use of adapters or some other > mechanism. If not

Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and PEP 3148 support

11.01.2011 01:26, Christopher Armstrong kirjoitti: 2011/1/10 Alex Grönholm > There has been some discussion over email between myself and several Twisted developers regarding the possibility of adding support for PEP 3148 futures and executors to Twis

Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and PEP 3148 support

2011/1/10 Alex Grönholm > There has been some discussion over email between myself and several > Twisted developers regarding the possibility of adding support for PEP > 3148 futures and executors to Twisted. I'm starting this thread to move > the conversation to this mailing list to gain a broad

Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and PEP 3148 support

11.01.2011 00:01, Jason J. W. Williams kirjoitti: > Do futures support chaining? From a cursory read of PEP 3148 it > doesn't look like they do. To add to my previous statement, this will obviously limit the portability of existing protocols, but I don't see it as a problem for *new code*. > -J >

Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and PEP 3148 support

11.01.2011 00:01, Jason J. W. Williams kirjoitti: > Do futures support chaining? From a cursory read of PEP 3148 it > doesn't look like they do. They don't support chaining. Like I said, the underlying mechanics are quite a bit different from Deferreds. I don't really see that as a problem. Feel

Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and PEP 3148 support

Do futures support chaining? From a cursory read of PEP 3148 it doesn't look like they do. -J 2011/1/10 Alex Grönholm : > There has been some discussion over email between myself and several > Twisted developers regarding the possibility of adding support for PEP > 3148 futures and executors to T

[Twisted-Python] Twisted and PEP 3148 support

There has been some discussion over email between myself and several Twisted developers regarding the possibility of adding support for PEP 3148 futures and executors to Twisted. I'm starting this thread to move the conversation to this mailing list to gain a broader audience. For those who do

[Twisted-Python] Twisted and ICP protocol

Hello All, I have been trying to get a squid proxy to "talk" to a twisted proxy and I came across an old email from this list where someone mentioned that they had implemented a basic ICP protocol in twisted. Does anyone still have that implementation? Or any good pointers on setting me off in t

Re: [Twisted-Python] Want something fixed?

On 05:11 pm, j...@mumak.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:15 PM, wrote: Hi all, I'd like someone to do a review on #4395 - a ticket about some conch key exchange bugs.  The branch isn't very large, a little under 500 lines of diff (with nearly a hundred of those deletions). In exchange

Re: [Twisted-Python] Want something fixed?

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:15 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like someone to do a review on #4395 - a ticket about some conch key > exchange bugs.  The branch isn't very large, a little under 500 lines of > diff (with nearly a hundred of those deletions). > > In exchange for a thorough review (and pe