On 21 February 2011 14:50, Michael Thompson wrote:
> This might be better expressed as how do you write a protocol to
> handle errors when using an unreliable transport. It down to your
> protocol as to how you need to handle errors by for instance sending a
> NACK or re-transmitting a request.
On 21 February 2011 06:26, Jason Heeris wrote:
> So how I do I deal with protocol errors in a connectionless protocol?
This might be better expressed as how do you write a protocol to
handle errors when using an unreliable transport. It down to your
protocol as to how you need to handle errors by
I'm still a little confused about exactly how to deal with errors and
responses using protocols and factories. I think a lot of my
misunderstanding stems from the fact that I'm using serial (and
inter-process) communications, both of which Twisted treats rather
differently from TCP based connection
