On Sep 30, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
> Hi Glyph,
>
> Thanks for your response!
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Glyph wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
>
>> What am I doing wrong? Is this a bug?
>
> I think it
On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>
> Am 30.09.2013 um 20:42 schrieb Glyph :
>
>>> I have that on my todo-list since the beginning of time but never got
>>> around to it.
>>
>> Do you have a link to a Nevow bug in some tracker (launchpad, perhaps?) that
>> is tracking thi
Hi Glyph,
Thanks for your response!
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Glyph wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
>
> What am I doing wrong? Is this a bug?
>
>
> I think it's pretty clearly a bug. Calling the argument "proto" in the
> first place indicat
Am 30.09.2013 um 20:42 schrieb Glyph :
>> I have that on my todo-list since the beginning of time but never got around
>> to it.
>
> Do you have a link to a Nevow bug in some tracker (launchpad, perhaps?) that
> is tracking this?
Yes, I believe it’s https://bugs.launchpad.net/nevow/+bug/10910
On Sep 29, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
> I have that on my todo-list since the beginning of time but never got around
> to it.
Do you have a link to a Nevow bug in some tracker (launchpad, perhaps?) that is
tracking this?
-glyph
___
Tw
On Sep 30, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
> What am I doing wrong? Is this a bug?
I think it's pretty clearly a bug. Calling the argument "proto" in the first
place indicates the nature of the confusion.
There are parts of the flow here from bytes to method executi
Hi everyone,
I think I've hit one of those cases where AMP really seems to want
everything (locator, receiver, sender) to be an instance of t.p.amp.AMP :-(
I've written some code that tries to multiplex stream transports over AMP:
https://github.com/lvh/txampext/blob/multiplexing/txampext/multi
