Mark, you might find this link helpful:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/172306/how-are-you-planning-on-handling-the-migration-to-python-3/214601#214601
Seems to me that the answer is no, there isn't a serious effort underway to
port to Python 3, and there probably won't be for a while. My gues
reactor.callLater() is the best way to delay a certain function call.
sleep() will block the entire program from running, which you probably don't
want to do.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Paul Thomas
wrote:
>
> On 7 Oct 2009, at 20:30, Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to do something
009 at 11:13 PM, Steve Steiner (listsin) <
list...@integrateddevcorp.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Matt Perry wrote:
>
> > One thing of note is that you say you have concurrency issues
> > handled -- but with asynchronous I/O, there are no concurrency
&g
Your limit will usually be the number of file descriptors in the system,
which can be usually changed via ulimit or your system's equivalent. On
Linux I believe it defaults to 1024, so you should be able to handle 1024
simultaneous connections.
One thing of note is that you say you have concurren
ry Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2009/9/17 Matt Perry :
> > Make sure you're using the @inlineCallbacks decorator and the yield
> > statement referenced previously. Without those you're just adding
> several
> > callbacks to the same Deferred; with them
Make sure you're using the @inlineCallbacks decorator and the yield
statement referenced previously. Without those you're just adding several
callbacks to the same Deferred; with them, the function will wait until the
Deferred fires before continuing.
def logRequest(self, *arg, **kw):
obj = co
