On Mar 19, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Michael Thompson wrote:
> I agree that threads and processes is going to be the first step to
> scaling but I don't think there's much advantage putting that in
> twisted given that there are other solutions for this.
Other solutions for what? If Twisted is going to
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 20:54 -0400, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> My pet theory is that it has something to do with transferring data
> from threads to the I/O loop via queue synchronization, and not being
> as smart as it could be about buffering, and that particular technique
> getting slammed really
On 19 March 2011 08:29, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:35 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>
> A multi-process WSGI container might actually be of practical use, since
> it may make more cores available to your server. If an application is
> bottlenecked on CPU rather than som
On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:35 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> A multi-process WSGI container might actually be of practical use, since
> it may make more cores available to your server. If an application is
> bottlenecked on CPU rather than some high-latency operation (as you can
> only proc
On 12:54 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>On Mar 18, 2011, at 7:44 PM, Michael Thompson wrote:
>> From the guys who brought you async socket benchmark,
>>http://nichol.as/asynchronous-servers-in-python, comes Python WSGI
>>benchmark
>>http://nichol.as/benchmark-of-python-web-servers.
>
>Yep, I'v
On Mar 18, 2011, at 7:44 PM, Michael Thompson wrote:
> From the guys who brought you async socket benchmark,
> http://nichol.as/asynchronous-servers-in-python, comes Python WSGI
> benchmark
> http://nichol.as/benchmark-of-python-web-servers.
Yep, I've seen that before. It's one of the better ben
>From the guys who brought you async socket benchmark,
http://nichol.as/asynchronous-servers-in-python, comes Python WSGI
benchmark
http://nichol.as/benchmark-of-python-web-servers.
Is twisted coming out of this so badly because they are using the
default reactor, as opposed to epoll?
Perhaps the
