On 5 April 2011 20:06, Žiga Seilnacht wrote:
> I think that the main reason for PortableGtkReactor being used on Windows
> is due to glib's IO channels limitations on Windows. You can only have 63
> channels in the event loop at the same time due to g_poll's use of
> MsgWaitForMultipleObject.
The
Hello,
On 5.4.2011 9:08, Jason Heeris wrote:
> I'd like to try and get to the bottom of the various problems with
> Twisted + GTK + Windows (mainly issue #4932[1], but see also issues
> #4376[2], #4862[3], #1759[4]).
>
> On issue #4376 there's a comment from Exarkun:
>
> "glib handles timeouts muc
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 15:08 +0800, Jason Heeris wrote:
> I'd like to try and get to the bottom of the various problems with
> Twisted + GTK + Windows (mainly issue #4932[1], but see also issues
> #4376[2], #4862[3], #1759[4]).
Thanks for looking into this!
> On issue #4376 there's a comment from
Jason Heeris wrote:
[…]
> "glib handles timeouts much less efficiently than any of the existing
> Twisted reactors. Letting glib take care of these would probably make
> the glib-based reactors unusable for applications with many timeouts."
>
> Is there a benchmark or piece of code somewhere that
I'd like to try and get to the bottom of the various problems with
Twisted + GTK + Windows (mainly issue #4932[1], but see also issues
#4376[2], #4862[3], #1759[4]).
On issue #4376 there's a comment from Exarkun:
"glib handles timeouts much less efficiently than any of the existing
Twisted reacto
