* Manlio Perillo [2008-12-13 11:54:05 +0100]:
> gl...@divmod.com ha scritto:
>
>> For another, the paper arbitrarily redefines the word "threads" to mean
>> "this cool thing that doesn't exist yet", rather than existing things
>> that people call "threads". It specifically mentions the defici
gl...@divmod.com ha scritto:
On 10:06 pm, m...@cerenity.org wrote:
[...]
For another, the paper arbitrarily redefines the word "threads" to mean
"this cool thing that doesn't exist yet", rather than existing things
that people call "threads". It specifically mentions the deficiencies
of curr
On 10:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking slightly below the surface of things, it appears to be
advocating
something more like stackless's tasklets, rather than OS level threads
(since
it makes reference near the end to Erlang's threading model).
Yes, and for this reason I found the pape
Hi,
I came across this livejournal entry today:
* http://four.livejournal.com/934085.html
Which has this link:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/four.livejournal/20081209/threads-hotos-2003.pdf
.. which is a paper by Rob von Behren, Jeremy Condit and Eric Brewer. I
personally raised an eyebrow when I
