On 12:05 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>
>On Aug 19, 2012, at 3:49 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>On 03:48 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>>
>>>For the next sprint, our BuildBot maintainer has assured me that
>>>he'll
>>>be moving the build master infrastructure to a faster machi
On Aug 19, 2012, at 3:49 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 03:48 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>
>> For the next sprint, our BuildBot maintainer has assured me that he'll
>> be moving the build master infrastructure to a faster machine before
>> then, so that hopefully it will co
On 03:48 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>
>For the next sprint, our BuildBot maintainer has assured me that he'll
>be moving the build master infrastructure to a faster machine before
>then, so that hopefully it will cope better with the increased load of
>a sprint.
Slave capacity really ne
On Aug 18, 2012, at 5:59 AM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
wrote:
> Last sprint the buildbot got overwhelmed with a giant backlog of runs and
> became essentially useless for the duration of the sprint. Jean-Paul had two
> suggestions:
> Don't commit to trunk during the sprint, even if your branch wa
Last sprint the buildbot got overwhelmed with a giant backlog of runs and
became essentially useless for the duration of the sprint. Jean-Paul had
two suggestions:
1. Don't commit to trunk during the sprint, even if your branch was
approved; wait until the sprint is over so trunk commits are
