> It seems like creating a stackexchange would just split the support power.
+1, totally.
>
One issue I've noticed with Stackoverflow is it is harder for new
developers to participate where as the barrier for entry on Google
Groups is just having an email address.
Some email groups
can be ver
It seems like creating a stackexchange would just split the support power.
Better to just push people to the Stackoverflow tag.
Just noticed that Adobe is also using Stackoverflow for official support.
One issue I've noticed with Stackoverflow is it is harder for new developers
to participate whe
UPDATE - This is really really bad - check out the paypal phishing
example on my blog already using Cyrillic characters
http://blog.collins.net.pr/2009/12/de-latinisation-of-web.html
Please forward to everyone in a position to stop ICANN, i cant believe
they didn't think of this in advance.
Nice => https://twitter.com/oauth/authenticate?force_login=true?{signed
args} this stuff is working very well for me;) Thank you for your
hint.
Axel
On 29 Dez., 03:21, Andy Freeman wrote:
> > The difference (to my understanding) is that Authenticate does not
> > authorize the app.
>
> Huh?
>
> W
Jonathan,
Good points and initiative.
>
> I do not believe Twitter have the resources to recreate the success of
> Stack Overflow for Q&A purposes.
Have you considered setting up a Twitter Dev Q&A beta site on
stackexchange.com? I have, and someone probably could, but I thought I'd wait
and
> The difference (to my understanding) is that Authenticate does not
> authorize the app.
Huh?
Whether I use authorize or authenticate, my app can tweet etc on the
user's behalf.
What, exactly, do you think that authenticate and authorize do? I
think that both can give my application a token th
The difference (to my understanding) is that Authenticate does not
authorize the app. We need to have the app authorized but want to give
the user the chance to choose which account to login with (and
Authorize).
Ideally, twitter state would not be effected, and user could authorize
an app with de
That is true. Authenticate currently leaves the user logged in.
I would prefer that get fixed rather then adding force_login to authorize as
I view leaving users logged in as a security risk. Apparently Twitter does
not:
http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=1070
On Mon, Dec 28,
Then use authenticate. It accomplishes the same effect of authorize.
Does it? My notes say that authenticate leaves the user logged into
twitter if they weren't before and that authorize doesn't.
For my purposes, I'd like to force the user to specify their twitter
account and password even if
Hi All,
I'm sure that many of you have seen the rise of Stack Overflow as the
source for developer questions and answers over the last year. Many
members of this group's community are active there with over 400
questions already tagged as being related to Twitter development:
http://stackoverflow
> Then use authenticate. It accomplishes the same effect of authorize.
Does it? My notes say that authenticate leaves the user logged into
twitter if they weren't before and that authorize doesn't.
For my purposes, I'd like to force the user to specify their twitter
account and password even if
On Dec 28, 2009, at 2:53 AM, Drekey wrote:
My company developed a small Flash/AS3 app that pulled some twitts and
twitters from twitters. All was working well even when we put it
online, so the http://static.twitter.com/crossdomain.xml should be
allowing by then.
Our crossdomain.xml file has
Sorry to keep bringing this up, but this is still causing problems for
me. Is there any follow-up as to what the issue is? Thanks in
advance.
On Dec 22, 10:06 pm, Mageuzi wrote:
> Is there an update to the status of this issue? A user of my program
> reported a problem that ended up being this
We're adding strings in addition to the numeric representation. See
the announcement at
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-api-announce/browse_frm/thread/67bacbc45a922b38.
On Dec 22, 5:21 pm, Josh Roesslein wrote:
> I wonder if in the next API version you could just make next_cusor and
> pre
>
> 2) Retrieving all the tweets from my followers (if that's possible
> with the API, I DONT KNOW HOW) and then filstering them by checking if
> these tweets contains a choosen #hashtag
> >> This time, I would filter less tweets than in solution 1, right?
>
http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-REST
In order for your application to act on behalf of a user you must follow the
OAuth flow and get access tokens for the user.
You can read about getting started with OAuth from:
http://oauth.net/documentation/getting-started/
You can also read my slightly dated walkthrough although the flow will st
Hi everybody,
First, thanks a lot to all the people out there, your help is
precious.
I'm willing to create a little php/jquery app that would display the
tweets of my followers only.
I thought of 2 solutions, can you give me your opinion ?
1) First, retrieving the names of all my followers with
Sounds really interesting. I've been keen to start working with the
Twitter API, and more to the point I'm keen to add Twitter support as
a feature of the start-up I'm developing at present.
I also hope that the Chirp will be recorded and posted online, because
as a UK developer I can't always aff
the Done button still defaults to the Deny action.
On Dec 6, 1:55 pm, Rich wrote:
> Nope we use oAuth on the iPhone
>
> The UI is better than it used to be, I haven't checked recently on
> whether pressing the Done key on the iPhone keyboard still defaults to
> the Deny button though.
>
> It woul
Tried to register test application and tried to use that oauth.py
script with newer consumer key and consumer secret. but unluckily
there's no success.
here is the newest HTTP logs:
"send: 'POST
http://twitter.com/oauth/request_token?oauth_nonce=81708853&oauth_timestamp=1262009548&oauth_consumer_
Hello. Thanks for info.
As far as i read, the "consumer_key" is just a user's nickname in
Twitter. is it true?
Speaking about registering an application with Twitter. Does it
needed when i just want to use some well-known open-source
applications/scripts to communicate with Twitter using my twitt
I have a flash/as3 application that is reading twittes from a
backoffice's XML output. It was working fine until one of the photos
of one of the twitters was in http://staging.twitter.com/images/NAMEOFPIC.png
It seams reading from the twitter.com domain is a big no-no, but I'm
reading from the twi
very excited about the open Firehose feed. i think Chirp would really
fit Twitter's scalable, open-source model if it were free or close to
being free. i'm a fan...thanks!
On Dec 28, 12:24 am, Ryan Sarver wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Now that the dust has settled a bit and we are in the midst of the hol
My company developed a small Flash/AS3 app that pulled some twitts and
twitters from twitters. All was working well even when we put it
online, so the http://static.twitter.com/crossdomain.xml should be
allowing by then.
Since last week we haven't been able to pull anything since we get a
sandbox
On Dec 27, 3:32 pm, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you tried creating a new OAuth application with the correct callback
> URL?
Do you mean registering a new app with Twitter, or do you mean
creating a new Rails app on my end? (Not that I've done either one.)
The problem is no
Hello,
I tested it with curl and it seems to work fine...probably it is a bug
in my lib...
Thanks!
On Dec 27, 9:40 pm, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you still having this issue?
>
> I just tried both:
>
> http://twitter.com/blocks/blocking/ids.jsonhttp://twitter.com/blocks/blo
Hey Ryan,
Thanks for writing this up. Fantastic to have it summarized.
Congratulations to the whole team on what you've managed to achieved so far
- truly mind blowing. Looking forward to seeing what you bring in 2010.
My 2c on what you announced here:
1) It's become frustrating to have the c
27 matches
Mail list logo