[twitter-dev] Re: oauth_callback

2010-12-08 Thread Dave-twiends
Hi Tim, I'm pretty sure the oauth_verifier is documented in their oAuth articles.. I'm speeking from memory here, but I'm sure I saw last week when we were investigating our own oAuth issues.. But, nonetheless, you are correct, oauth_verifier should be passed back every time. Dave Twiends

[twitter-dev] Re: oAuth still working for everyone.?

2010-12-04 Thread Dave-twiends
Yeah, I second that.. A sandbox authorize/request_token/access_token set of pages will be great... We could use these to check our implementations are up to spec with the revision.. Thanks On Dec 4, 5:19 pm, gumbah joost.ruy...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the roll back Taylor, both my

[twitter-dev] oAuth still working for everyone.?

2010-12-02 Thread Dave-twiends
I noticed I've just started getting 401's for all my oAuth requests. Seems to be happening on more than one site for me.. My application keys and status still look good.. Just wondering if anyone else is having an issue..? -- Twitter developer documentation and resources:

[twitter-dev] Re: oAuth still working for everyone.?

2010-12-02 Thread Dave-twiends
flexible with previously. Taylor On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Twitlonger stu...@abovetheinternet.orgwrote: I'm seeing a lot of invalid/expired token errors. On Dec 2, 9:21 pm, Dave-twiends i...@davesumter.com wrote: I noticed I've just started getting 401's for all my oAuth

[twitter-dev] Re: oAuth still working for everyone.?

2010-12-02 Thread Dave-twiends
Thanks, I'm up again, looks like it was just oauth_verifier that I was missing... Phew.. I'll take some time this week to read the spec in detail and make sure I'm not missing anything else.. Thanks Dave On Dec 2, 10:59 pm, Taylor Singletary taylorsinglet...@twitter.com wrote: Hi Folks,

[twitter-dev] Hat’s off to you and your colleagues

2010-11-12 Thread Dave-twiends
. That made me realized that I’ve been taking for granted what you guys have achieved with this api. Well done guys Hat’s off to you and your colleagues. Dave Twiends -- Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi

[twitter-dev] Re: Certificate Twitter Apps

2010-10-26 Thread Dave-twiends
I totally agree. It would be difficult for twitter to do this... Give your users confidence by proactively anticipating their fears and addressing them. Figure out what would stop them from signing in with OAuth and answer those questions upfron. The favstar.fm example is very good as it

[twitter-dev] Re: WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING

2010-10-25 Thread Dave-twiends
As I fellow developer I'll say I fully support the drive to OAuth. It's a lot more secure and although it might mean that you actually have to write a few lines of code it will help stamp out a lot issues with straight usernames and passwords.. OAuth took me total of about 2 hours to implement,

[twitter-dev] Re: Provide a spam score (or rather a “good citizen” flag)

2010-10-17 Thread Dave-twiends
dream but if they can I'd love a karma scoring system directly from the API. On Oct 16, 4:28 am, Dave-twiends i...@davesumter.com wrote: I really like the option of reporting spam via the api. I’ve been blocking spam on my site for a long time but this gives me an option to report it now

[twitter-dev] Provide a spam score (or rather a “g ood citizen” flag)

2010-10-16 Thread Dave-twiends
I really like the option of reporting spam via the api. I’ve been blocking spam on my site for a long time but this gives me an option to report it now, and hopefully get these account suspended quicker so that they don’t come back. It would be really great if we could have a proactive api

[twitter-dev] Follow-back should always be private

2010-10-16 Thread Dave-twiends
I’m looking to implement this feature on my site as I can really see the value in it. But as you have pointed out I can also see the danger in it. If spammers knew who had follow-back turned on they would seek out these users and follow them, knowing they would get followed back. They could then