hi Bob Thanks for your links. Here are my answers:
Twitter is - I think - the best vehicle for what I want to achieve, users generated sitcoms. Here's the definition that I have set on www.twitter.com/twitcom - For a given location and a given time slot, a *selected* small number of people (the Cast) will be exchanging. - The content will mostly be text (ie line of 140 char) but can include images (fed ie through TwitPic). - It is a real time exchange but would ideally been prepared - These events are scheduled The platform is Twitcom.com for each episode. Twitter ' followers' can comment as the episode evolve but the comments are not part of teh sitcom exchange. Each twitcom episode is sponsored for the duration for its duration. (commercial breaks would break the momentum) I take your point that inputs could come from other social platforms ie Facebook, YouTube but it complexify something that is rather simple (?) Voila in short the project. Let me know your thoughts On another note, your profile lists the email * gest...@fiduciairegenerale.com* <gest...@fiduciairegenerale.com> so you might spreak french (?) thanks <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jean-francois-gagn%C3%A9/0/3b5/585> Jean-Francois On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Admin_Gen <gest...@fiduciairegenerale.com>wrote: > > > Why twitter ? > There is a subsequent number of options. Watch out that site where I > added the last message (bob saint clar). > > http://mashable.com/2007/07/25/open-source-social-platforms/?dsq=11452830#comment-11452830 > > Why twitter and not facebook, or other ? Why that choice ? > Is it what your body is telling you, or did that choice come from a > structured analysis. > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124571709339739367.html > > Thank you for your reply. > Bob > > > >
