on
> > on its public website. As I'm not a member of the closed beta, did I
> > miss something, or is this public launch of OAuth functionality
> > premature?
>
--
:: Rod Begbie :: http://groovymother.com/ ::
ckr does) to prevent further surprises. I'm not sure users
appreciate that an authorised app can:
* Post and delete tweets in your name
* Add and remove users you are following
* Block and unblock users
* Change your name, email address, location, avatar or description
Thoughts?
Rod.
--
:: Rod Begbie :: http://groovymother.com/ ::
hange your name, email address, location, avatar or description
> >> >
> >> > Thoughts?
> >>
> >> This is an excellent point.
> >>
> >> --
> >> personal:
> >> http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
> >> Cameron Kaiser * Floodga
feedback everybody.
>
> Thanks;
> — Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
>
> On Apr 15, 2009, at 08:27 PM, Rod Begbie wrote:
>
> There are two separate questions here:
> 1) Should Twitter make the language on the Authorization page clearer as to
> exactly what an app can do if you c
ething like that...?
Only if there isn't a public API method for authorized apps to rate
themselves as 5 stars ;)
Rod.
--
:: Rod Begbie :: http://groovymother.com/ ::
/factoryjoe/3448360090/
>
Pretty cool. I'd support something like that.
Rod.
--
:: Rod Begbie :: http://groovymother.com/ ::
