On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Scott Haneda talkli...@newgeo.com wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but everything I have read about this makes the below
impossible. If you have a trademark on a name, you MUST protect it.
Failure to protect it, results in loss of the mark.
The quote below,
Did you try Internet Explorer?
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:22 AM, dean.j.robinson
dean.j.robin...@gmail.comwrote:
99.9% of login attempts simply don't work at all in Firefox 3.5, they
just redirects to blank https://twitter.com/sessions page
If by some fluke it does actually login I can't
I think it's ok to go for it, what does everyone else think?
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Tim Haines tmhai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
This is probably a very dumb question, but I thought I'd ask it
anyway.
I run http://favstar.fm, and I can't call the API more than 60 or so
times
from Twitter.
Abraham
2009/8/9 avail4one avail4...@gmail.com
I think it's ok to go for it, what does everyone else think?
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Tim Haines tmhai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
This is probably a very dumb question, but I thought I'd ask it
anyway.
I run http
hmmm you wanna dump random content your robot found on the internet on kids
and hope your stuff doesn't scare the crap out of grandma?
it would probably be just as interesting and profitable to block human
visitors and instead use random roboreader bots. then it would be
totally-fully-automated.
