On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 04:23:40PM -0500, TJ Luoma wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:19 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
zzn...@gmail.com wrote:
Twitter, what say you? Developer community, what say you?
Twitter, Inc. can't even keep up with porn spammers reported manually
using the Report As
Hopefully as time goes on twitter will start pushing out more
sophisticated anti-spam
measures. On twitter.com/jobs does have an open position for anti-spam
engineer so they
are actively seeking to form a bigger team for this cause. So if you
are looking for work and
are a spam killing ninja might
I'm hearing from many Twitter users that the frustration level caused
by the Britney Bots is rising. I'm going to use some euphemisms to
make this message safe for work, but the particular bots in question
are certainly not work-safe.
The _modus operandi_ of these bots is as follows:
1. Get a
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:19 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
zzn...@gmail.com wrote:
Twitter, what say you? Developer community, what say you?
Twitter, Inc. can't even keep up with porn spammers reported manually
using the Report As Spam links, what makes you think they would be
able to keep up with
On 11/30/09 4:23 PM, TJ Luoma wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:19 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
zzn...@gmail.com wrote:
Twitter, what say you? Developer community, what say you?
Twitter, Inc. can't even keep up with porn spammers reported manually
using the Report As Spam links, what makes
Sign in to your Twitter account, go to http://twitblock.org, and drop
EVERY SINGLE JUNK FOLLOWER YOU HAVE.
No, the junk followers aren't britbots, but if you don't have any losers
following you your britbot exposure goes way, way, way down. I'm
particularly suspicious of the followers