[twitter-dev] Re: API 140 character truncation change?

2009-10-24 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:20:36PM -0700, Dewald Pretorius wrote: Instead of all of us having to do fancy tap-dances, the proper solution is for Twitter to issue an error response when a sent tweet is rejected for whatever reason. Yep, exactly. That's my big gripe about the whole thing.

[twitter-dev] Re: API 140 character truncation change?

2009-10-24 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:24:53PM -0700, AJ Chen wrote: I noticed this behavior a long time ago (may be a month) and reported the problem on this list, but it did not get any response from the api team. I thought it was a bug, but just realized yesterday that the api probably ignores 140+

[twitter-dev] Re: API 140 character truncation change?

2009-10-23 Thread AJ Chen
I noticed this behavior a long time ago (may be a month) and reported the problem on this list, but it did not get any response from the api team. I thought it was a bug, but just realized yesterday that the api probably ignores 140+ chars status update intentionally. but' I'm not sure this is the

[twitter-dev] Re: API 140 character truncation change?

2009-10-23 Thread AJ Chen
then, comparing the front part (without url at the end) of the status is probably sufficient. -aj On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote: You cannot compare the status sent with the status returned when the status contains an URL. The returned status contains

[twitter-dev] Re: API 140 character truncation change?

2009-10-23 Thread Dewald Pretorius
Instead of all of us having to do fancy tap-dances, the proper solution is for Twitter to issue an error response when a sent tweet is rejected for whatever reason. Dewald On Oct 23, 7:58 pm, AJ Chen cano...@gmail.com wrote: then, comparing the front part (without url at the end) of the status

[twitter-dev] Re: API 140 character truncation change?

2009-10-23 Thread Naveen Ayyagari
+1 agreed On Oct 23, 2009, at 7:20 PM, Dewald Pretorius wrote: Instead of all of us having to do fancy tap-dances, the proper solution is for Twitter to issue an error response when a sent tweet is rejected for whatever reason. Dewald On Oct 23, 7:58 pm, AJ Chen cano...@gmail.com wrote:

[twitter-dev] Re: API 140 character truncation change?

2009-10-21 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 07:37:03AM -0700, James Tymann wrote: Has anyone else noticed a change in the way that the 140 character limit is enforced via the API? I noticed a change sometime between the 13th and the 16th that is now causing all my 140+ character posts to be rejected by the API.

[twitter-dev] Re: API 140 character truncation change?

2009-10-20 Thread Josh Roesslein
This is the new intended behaviour from what I have been told. All tweets 140 in length will be silently ignored. I'm guessing they don't throw an error here yet to not break any existing clients until they have upgraded. Eventually I'm sure we will be some sort of 400 error in the future. For