As Taylor says, you don't need a different app for each account, but
actually that's the easy solution, with the added benefit that you
never need to do the Oauth dance to capture any tokens. PLUS... each
app gets the glory of it's own via tag.
Creating an app is no more work than creating a
Hi Taylor,
Ok, but how do you get an access token/access token secret for the
other account without creating a new app?
On Aug 11, 3:49 pm, Taylor Singletary taylorsinglet...@twitter.com
wrote:
Hi Marc,
In this case, instead of using the username/password of a different account
while
Hi Marc,
You can do this using the OAuth authentication flow which you can find
at http://dev.twitter.com/pages/auth#intro
This may seem very much complicated for a simple application with only a
few users (and static keys), and I agree. However, unless there is some
service on the internet
No he means each source is a user and has its own account, and
authorizes the single app for separate access tokens..
However, my question is, is not having aliases a btter solution for
this? In other words, on user having several aliases, each alias being
permitted to get separate access tokens
Sorry for the typos, here its again:
No, he means each source is a user and has its own account, and
authorizes the single app for separate access tokens..
However, my question is, is having aliases a better solution for this?
In other words, one user having several aliases, each alias being
That makes sense to me but that's not supported at this time from my
understanding.
On Aug 11, 5:04 pm, Jacky jaga...@gmail.com wrote:
No he means each source is a user and has its own account, and
authorizes the single app for separate access tokens..
However, my question is, is not having
Ok, I'll give it a try.
Thanks.
On Aug 11, 5:02 pm, Tom van der Woerdt i...@tvdw.eu wrote:
Hi Marc,
You can do this using the OAuth authentication flow which you can find
athttp://dev.twitter.com/pages/auth#intro
This may seem very much complicated for a simple application with only a
few
No its not, and I wish it was allowed/supported...
On Aug 11, 2:09 pm, Skygazer marc.bouc...@gmail.com wrote:
That makes sense to me but that's not supported at this time from my
understanding.
On Aug 11, 5:04 pm, Jacky jaga...@gmail.com wrote:
No he means each source is a user and has its
