Tweet appears to have been answered here
http://blog.twitter.com/2009/07/may-tweets-be-with-you.html
On Jan 13, 7:51 pm, DeWitt Clinton dclin...@gmail.com wrote:
That's great news. Thank you, Ryan.
How about terms like tweet and retweet? Or more generally, any word on
the questions raised
Right, I agree that the public statements (both Biz's post and Ryan's
comment here) are all aligned with what we expected and asked for. I'm
simply encouraging and hoping for the Terms to be updated to reflect that
position and remove the ambiguity for library, client, and service authors.
On Jan 14, 8:04 am, DeWitt Clinton dclin...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, here is what the Terms (http://twitter.com/tos) currently read,
effective: September 18, 2009:
All right, title, and interest in and to the Services (excluding Content
provided by users) are and will remain the exclusive
It's been four weeks since I originally asked this question. Is there
any chance at all it will be answered in the near future?
The time it takes to get a simple straight answer is mind-boggling.
On Dec 22 2009, 11:14 am, Duane Roelands duane.roela...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hopefully, I haven't
We're talking about lawyers here Duane. Straight forward is not a
term that they understand.
On 1/1/2010 2:31 PM, Duane Roelands wrote:
It's been four weeks since I originally asked this question. Is there
any chance at all it will be answered in the near future?
The time it takes to get a
Hopefully, I haven't asked a question with an unfortunate answer.
When I look at the number of great libraries with Twitter in the
name, it would be a real kick in the teeth to the developer community.
On Dec 22, 12:09 am, Ryan Sarver rsar...@twitter.com wrote:
Just wanted to follow up with
IANAL but you might want to look do a trademark search. Some relevant
links are at http://uspto.gov/ .
On Dec 4, 1:39 pm, Duane Roelands duane.roela...@gmail.com wrote:
A question for the Twitter team:
I'm the developer and maintainer of an open source library called
TwitterVB. Can I expect
