[twitter-dev] Re: in_reply_to_status_id validation has changed

2009-06-29 Thread Doug Williams
I have updated the documentation to reflect this change. Thanks for pointing out the error. Thanks, Doug On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Nick wrote: > > This is excellent news! (Sorry, I'm a little behind.) > > However, documentation still asserts that the @mention must be at the > beginning

[twitter-dev] Re: in_reply_to_status_id validation has changed

2009-06-28 Thread Nick
This is excellent news! (Sorry, I'm a little behind.) However, documentation still asserts that the @mention must be at the beginning of the tweet (maybe someone just needs to update this wiki page: http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-REST-API-Method%3A-statuses%C2%A0update) and the Twitter web i

[twitter-dev] Re: in_reply_to_status_id validation has changed

2009-04-30 Thread Doug Williams
I was suggesting using the call to statuses/show to build this URL programmatically, like with this psuedo-code: $status = new Status( "http://twitter.com/statuses/show/"; + $in_reply_to_status_id+ ".xml") $screen_name = $status->get_screen_name(); echo "http://twitter.com/"; + $screen_name + "/

[twitter-dev] Re: in_reply_to_status_id validation has changed

2009-04-30 Thread P Burrows
Well, sure. But, I was thinking more of building a url ala: http://twitter.com/demosthe/status/1659019581 -- Patrick Burrows http://www.CleverHumans.com On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Doug Williams wrote: > The statuses/show method is perfect [1]. > > 1. > http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitte

[twitter-dev] Re: in_reply_to_status_id validation has changed

2009-04-30 Thread Doug Williams
The statuses/show method is perfect [1]. 1. http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-REST-API-Method%3A-statuses%C2%A0show Thanks, Doug Doug Williams | Platform Support | Twitter, Inc. 539 Bryant St. Suite 402, San Francisco, CA 94107 h

[twitter-dev] Re: in_reply_to_status_id validation has changed

2009-04-30 Thread P Burrows
Is there an easy way to get the screen name of an in_reply_to_status_id for purposes of linking to the original tweet? On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Doug Williams wrote: > Before today, the value of the in_reply_to_status_id field was validated by > two requirements,: > > 1) It was set to a