RTT wrote:
On 04-02-2012 16:45, Arno Garrels wrote:
That's a question too, IMO accept/handle ranges should be optional
and silently changing the default behaviour of an existing method is
questionable, no?
I totally agree with that. The server should have an options property
to specify
On 05-02-2012 12:15, Arno Garrels wrote:
So there must be an option to allow
ranges on a per request basis. A new method would provide such an option.
I see. A new method then (and AnswerStreamAcceptRange seems more
appropriate).
Or, probably better, replace the AnswerStream code with the new
