RTT wrote:
On 04-02-2012 11:25, Arno Garrels wrote:
Tobias Rapp wrote:
Hi!
I have added a new function AnswerStreamPart
Shouldn't that method be named AnswerStreamAcceptRange,
or at least AnswerStreamRange?
How about if the this ranges handling code is added to the
AnswerStream
On 04-02-2012 16:45, Arno Garrels wrote:
That's a question too, IMO accept/handle ranges should be optional and
silently changing the default behaviour of an existing method is
questionable, no?
I totally agree with that. The server should have an options property to
specify this kind of
