ot;
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] ICS in DLL. My report about results
>Why don't you use initialization/finalization sections?
Do you really think that these sections are executed not from DLLMain?
--
Anton
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings fo
Paul
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:33:11 +0400
From: "Anton S."
Subject: Re: [twsocket] ICS in DLL. My report about results
To: twsocket@elists.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
>Why don't you use initialization/finali
>Why don't you use initialization/finalization sections?
Do you really think that these sections are executed not from DLLMain?
--
Anton
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at h
Unfortunately DLLMain appeared to be a very tricky thing: you can't call methods from other DLLs from there (incl
Yes, there is a lot of info about this in the Net.
I revised the situation but found only one way: provide special Start/Finish
methods for init/cleanup.
Why don't you use initial
After 1.5 days of struggling with DLL and async model I decided to share some
experience.
What I needed is DLL with several functions interacting via sockets with a
remote app. They must send request messages, receive responces, process them
and return as out parameters. Function call must be bl
