Hello:
We have a few applications using ICS v5, mostly written in D2006/7,
but some in D5. I would like to move to ICS v6, since that seems to be
where major development is taking place, and also because I would like
to take advantage of its new hidden window architecture. However, I'm
v6 IS stable. Yet the "test exception" could be a problem with threaddetach.
HTH,
SZ
> I would also like to hear from users of ICS v6 and whether they find
it stable in their production software.
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.el
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> v6 IS stable. Yet the "test exception" could be a problem with threaddetach.
>
Can you elaborate a bit more on this?
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website
DZ-Jay wrote:
> Hello:
> We have a few applications using ICS v5, mostly written in D2006/7,
> but some in D5.
D5 won't work, ICS V6 is specified for D7 and better.
> I would like to move to ICS v6, since that seems to
> be where major development is taking place, and also because I would
> like
> Are there any specific issues that I should be aware of before
> attempting the switch?
I've been using ICS V6 in all my commercial applications now for almost a
year, and it is absolutely solid. Migration from V5 to V6 is essentially
just changed the Uses names, but one or two more names may
On Oct 17, 2007, at 06:52, Arno Garrels wrote:
> function TFoo.MsgHandlersCount : Integer;
> begin
> Result := 1 + inherited MsgHandlersCount;
> end;
>
> procedure TFoo.AllocateMsgHandlers;
> begin
> inherited AllocateMsgHandlers;
> FMsg_WM_FOO := FWndHandler.AllocateMsgHandler(Self);
>
Arno claims otherwise but, occasionally after I threaddetach a THttpCli from
a worker thread, I get a test exception, which I guess means there are
posted messages still left on the message queue...
On 10/17/07, Olivier Sannier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > v6 IS
DZ-Jay wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2007, at 06:52, Arno Garrels wrote:
>> function TFoo.MsgHandlersCount : Integer;
>> begin
>> Result := 1 + inherited MsgHandlersCount;
>> end;
>>
>> procedure TFoo.AllocateMsgHandlers;
>> begin
>> inherited AllocateMsgHandlers;
>> FMsg_WM_FOO := FWndHandler.A
> I've been using ICS V6 in all my commercial applications
> now for almost a year, and it is absolutely solid.
> I have no idea why V6 is still called a beta, this is why
> many people refuse to use it.
Quick question: Is someone against renaming ICS-V6-BETA as "released" ?
Contribute to
