Hello,
We can donate $60 to the coder who can do this until Jan 1st 2010 as
performance is CRITICAL for some of our web reverse proxy customers.
Currently it can answer 10600 requests/sec from cache and looking for even
further improvement! (IIS7 can do 18000 req/s).
Regards,
SZ
On Wed, Dec
Arno, SZ, thanks for your answers!
Idea of removing some CritSections looks nice, as these sections, I suppose,
are unnecessary. This will surely increase overall performance.
--
Anton
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Anton Sviridov wrote:
Hello!
I'm writing multithreaded VCL application with following structure:
- one thread holding a number of sockets receiving data
- one server thread to provide remote control
- one main TApplication thread, of course
All actions with sockets are done within their
Arno,
so your advice is to leave everything as it is?
--
Anton
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Anton Sviridov wrote:
Hello!
I'm writing multithreaded VCL application with following structure:
- one thread holding a number of sockets receiving data
- one server thread to provide remote control
- one
Fastream Technologies wrote:
I noticed one thing--In my 4-cores machine, when I launch 4-8 worker
threads, it uses 50% CPU including the client stress tester (
http://www.fastream.com/webstresstester.php). For using up all the
cores, I had to open hundreds of threads--could this be related
Anton Sviridov wrote:
Arno,
so your advice is to leave everything as it is?
Currently yes.
My idea however was to introduce a new symbol for SSL
multi-thread-locking only, i.e. NO_SSL_MT and to
exchange symbol NO_ADV_MT by the new one in the SSL code.
Then it was most likely possible to
On 12/9/09, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Anton Sviridov wrote:
Arno,
so your advice is to leave everything as it is?
Currently yes.
My idea however was to introduce a new symbol for SSL
multi-thread-locking only, i.e. NO_SSL_MT and to
exchange symbol NO_ADV_MT by the new one
Hello!
I'm writing multithreaded VCL application with following structure:
- one thread holding a number of sockets receiving data
- one server thread to provide remote control
- one main TApplication thread, of course
All actions with sockets are done within their owner thread.
All inter-thread
ADV_MT enabled (i.e., NO_ADV_MT defined)
I mean, ADV_MT disabled (i.e., NO_ADV_MT defined)
--
Anton
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
10 matches
Mail list logo