Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Reasonable timeout
> Hello!
>
> > Francois PIETTE wrote:
> >>> I just wonder how other programs can provide a
> >>> user defined TCP timeout that appears to overrule the system setting or
> >>> is
Hello!
> Francois PIETTE wrote:
>>> I just wonder how other programs can provide a
>>> user defined TCP timeout that appears to overrule the system setting or
>>> is something like that just a fake?
>>
>> I've searched on MSDN and found that setsockopt has those options:
>> SO_RCVTIMEO Receives t
Hello Francois & Wilfried,
>> I think the timeout applies only to blocking socket
>
> correct :)
> I also found some resources witch confirm that, but I lost them :(
>
No problem, application-level timeouts are working fine for me in any case.
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change y
Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 6:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Reasonable timeout
>> Francois PIETTE wrote:
>> >> I just wonder how other program
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Reasonable timeout
> Francois PIETTE wrote:
> >> I just wonder how other programs can provide a
> >> user defined TCP timeout that appears to over
Francois PIETTE wrote:
>> I just wonder how other programs can provide a
>> user defined TCP timeout that appears to overrule the system setting or
>> is something like that just a fake?
>
> I've searched on MSDN and found that setsockopt has those options:
> SO_RCVTIMEO Receives time-out in milli
quot;Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 7:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Reasonable timeout
>
>
> Thanks Wilfried,
> ...
> My opinion was (and still is) that if I don't get a response afte
>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 7:22 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Reasonable timeout
Thanks Wilfried,
...
My opinion was (and still is) that if I don't get a response after
30-50 sec it's useless to wait any longer since either the line is too
bad or a s
Francois PIETTE wrote:
>> I just wonder how other programs can provide a
>> user defined TCP timeout that appears to overrule the system setting or
>> is something like that just a fake?
>
> I've searched on MSDN and found that setsockopt has those options:
> SO_RCVTIMEO Receives time-out in milli
> I just wonder how other programs can provide a
> user defined TCP timeout that appears to overrule the system setting or is
> something like that just a fake?
I've searched on MSDN and found that setsockopt has those options:
SO_RCVTIMEO Receives time-out in milliseconds (available in the Micros
Hello Arno,
> I recall that we had a discussion in this list a while ago, but there seems
> to be nothing in FAQ yet.
I have a lot of saved mails to put in the FAQ. Maybe I recalled some of
them. Need to find some time soon to upgrade FAQ. Will drop a message as
always when done.
> I just wonder
Thanks Wilfried,
>> 2. How can I catch and handle a system TCP timeout in ICS? and
>
> You will get the 10060 (conn timed out) as error argument in the
> TWSocket events.
Good to know, that's easy enough to handle.
>> 1. How do I find the actual system TCP timeout?
>
> Dont know, somewhere in
Hello,
Actually I have a custom timeout in all of my applications which
is hardcoded to values between 30-50 seconds. It's that short because
I do not want the system timeout hit in my program flow.
But now users want the timeout user defined and longer :(.
So my questions are:
1. How do I find t
Hello Arno,
> 2. How can I catch and handle a system TCP timeout in ICS? and
You will get the 10060 (conn timed out) as error argument in the
TWSocket events.
> 1. How do I find the actual system TCP timeout?
Dont know, somewhere in registry I suppose. I _think_ we have a FAQ but
I cannot searc
14 matches
Mail list logo
