> My debug function to log the timestamps was the culprit. I should
> have just grabbed the time before, then the time after and done the
> math.
Using real time to calculate duration is very inefficient, it's much
better to use GetTickCount which is milliseconds running time since
Windows boot
> My debug function to log the timestamps was the culprit.
oke then all is fine :)
---
Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
http://www.mestdagh.biz
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bi
Wilfried,
ErmOops. etc.
My debug function to log the timestamps was the culprit. I should have just
grabbed the time before, then the time after and done the math. What I actually
did was review my log file with timestamps in it. This was the cause of the
delay.
Using the time before and
Hello Andy,
> Dan was correct. The time I noted was for Send to return, not for the data to
> actually be sent.
Sorry then I have given you a wrong answer.
> Given the 300ms for Send to return, is this to be expected?
No it should return immediatly, the function is async. Are you
absolutely sur
Wilfried,
Dan was correct. The time I noted was for Send to return, not for the data to
actually be sent.
Given the 300ms for Send to return, is this to be expected?
If it is, then I will look to optimise elsewhere. But it just seems likely that
something is a miss - wrong option setting maybe
Hello Dan,
> As far as I know it shouldn't cause the TWSocket send call to take
> longer since that is asynchronous
Correct, but I think he means the total time to send, not the time of
the function call.
---
Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
http://www.me
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Wilfried Mestdagh
> Sent: 13 May 2008 19:34
> To: ICS support mailing
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] TWSocket.Send timing
>
> Hello Andy,
>
> > I am logging the time befo
Wilfried,
I'll have a look on MSDN and see what they say.
I think that I will try and pad out my data to the min packet size an dsee if
that speeds things up, or screws up the server.
Regards,
Andy
Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
> Hello Andy,
>
>> I am logging the time before and after a call to Se
Hello Andy,
> I am logging the time before and after a call to Send. I am sending 60 bytes,
> and the Send call is taking 300ms to complete.
this is the nagle algoritm. nagle wait a little while to see if you want
to send more. this is to fill up a complete packet of 1514 (?) bytes.
You can speed
Hi,
I am logging the time before and after a call to Send. I am sending 60 bytes,
and the Send call is taking 300ms to complete.
Does this sound right?
I am running a P4 2.4GHz 1G ram. I was expecting 10's of ms really.
If this is to be expected, then I won't ask the next question - which woul
10 matches
Mail list logo
