well, if you seriously consider user interface a feature, there there
is a comparison to be made.
we are in the business of not only delivering functionality, but user
experience. and this is where we are lacking in typo3. When I say "We"
i mean my company, as we havent customized the backend full
*ahem*
If only joomla had some of the capabilities of typo3 maybe then we'd
take the comparison seriously
Stephen Bungert wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Davis wrote:
>> it seems clear to us that typo3 be needs serious
>> simplification. This is not a knock against Typo3. it is
>> straightforward e
like everything else, some get it some don't and then there's the
folks in between.
for those that get it, they love it, for those who don't, there's no
chance they ever will. its the folks in the middle were trying to get
rolling with it
joomla isnt the answer because it is too abstract... t
Andrew Davis wrote:
> it seems clear to us that typo3 be needs serious
> simplification. This is not a knock against Typo3. it is
> straightforward enough and very powerful, but for joe-average, still
> over their head.
>
I have to agree with this. I have to re-design for our company sites
