Hi folks,
Artemy Nikolsky wrote:
> Use APC. It will be moved from pecl to php core in the future releases
Just a warning to make sure you use the latest stable version of APC 3.0.19.
We had some issues with other versions (including the betas).
Best,
Ben.
--
Xavier Perseguers wrote:
>> Use APC. It will be moved from pecl to php core in the future releases
>
> Funny, I heard the very same phrase about APC being moved to PHP core in
> a future release years ago. But seems that it did not happen yet ;-)
It's on the TODO for PHP6:
http://wiki.php.net/tod
Hi,
>> And yes, I could confirm it was in fact eaccelerator because after I
>> turned it off
>> our sites started to work normally again. I am not sure what the exact
>> issue was except
>> a 'not so happy' client :D
>>
>
> Use APC. It will be moved from pecl to php core in the future releases
"ries van Twisk" ???/ ? ?:
news:mailman.44923.1235477716.2904.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
>
> On Feb 24, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Dmitry Dulepov wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Xavier Perseguers wrote:
>>> I guess the problem is the same with any software you develop and t
I too cannot present that somebody uses php without an accelerator.
I had in view of, that TYPO3 integral as windows or *nix compiled with all
options. We can use all possibilities from a box. It is convenient and
simple for 99 % of users, but a payment for it expensive hardware.
It is possible
"Dmitry Dulepov" ÓÏÏÂÝÉÌ/ÓÏÏÂÝÉÌÁ × ÎÏ×ÏÓÔÑÈ ÓÌÅÄÕÀÝÅÅ:
news:mailman.1.1235460165.22293.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
> Hi!
>
> Artemy Nikolsky wrote:
>> To buy many hardware it`s
>> 1) very boring =)
>> 2) And it is not always possible (DC have not empty seat)
>> 3) Very long (I wait
On Feb 24, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Dmitry Dulepov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Xavier Perseguers wrote:
>> I guess the problem is the same with any software you develop and
>> that
>> is not targeted at a special usage. Artemy said that it would be
>> great
>> to "compile" TYPO3 according to our needs, a bit l
"Xavier Perseguers" ???/ ?
?:
news:mailman.1.1235412262.2116.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
> Hi,
>
>>> I spoke about such sheme:
>>> typo3 <==> memcatch <==> webserver
>>
>> This sounds like a memcached version of nc_staticfilecache.
>>
>> Weather you use pr
"Erik Svendsen" ???/ ? ?:
news:mailman.1.1235415905.9236.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
> Hello Xavier,
>
>> Now try... ... ... Moss (I wrote it!) and perhaps you'll understand
>> what huge hardware means even for really small install and reall low
>> demand ;
Hi!
Erik Svendsen wrote:
> And of course you don't have all the "small" tools which help you to run
> big sites with cheaper hardware.
>
> But people with heavy load sites and not so heavy hardware should look
> at Varnish, http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/. One publishing house in
> Norway with
Hi!
Xavier Perseguers wrote:
> I guess the problem is the same with any software you develop and that
> is not targeted at a special usage. Artemy said that it would be great
> to "compile" TYPO3 according to our needs, a bit like the Linux kernel.
Easy! Use eaccelerator! It compiles source code
Hi!
Artemy Nikolsky wrote:
> To buy many hardware it`s
> 1) very boring =)
> 2) And it is not always possible (DC have not empty seat)
> 3) Very long (I wait 2-3 weeks delivery of a server + 1 week for stress
> testing )
> 4) And banal: no money (hello crisis)
> 5) etc..
> Typo3 Very big, i
Hello Xavier,
> Now try... ... ... Moss (I wrote it!) and perhaps you'll understand
> what huge hardware means even for really small install and reall low
> demand ;-)
>
> One contribution a day keeps the fork away
>
And of course you don't have all the "small" tools which help you to run
big
Hi,
>> I spoke about such sheme:
>> typo3 <==> memcatch <==> webserver
>
> This sounds like a memcached version of nc_staticfilecache.
>
> Weather you use proxy servers or cache to file/memcache, use more servers for
> DB etc.. there's always need for optimization in such environments, but this
Artemy Nikolsky wrote:
> I spoke about such sheme:
> typo3 <==> memcatch <==> webserver
This sounds like a memcached version of nc_staticfilecache.
Weather you use proxy servers or cache to file/memcache, use more servers for
DB etc.. there's always need for optimization in such environments, b
"Dmitry Dulepov" ÓÏÏÂÝÉÌ/ÓÏÏÂÝÉÌÁ × ÎÏ×ÏÓÔÑÈ ÓÌÅÄÕÀÝÅÅ:
news:mailman.1.1235319059.10483.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
> Hi!
>
> Artemy Nikolsky wrote:
>> Pentium D 2,8GHz CPU/4Gb RAM, 4x7200rpm IDE HDD (RAID10)
>
> RAM is your bottleneck.
>
>> apache1.3/mod_php for typo3, lighthttpd for
Hi!
Artemy Nikolsky wrote:
> Pentium D 2,8GHz CPU/4Gb RAM, 4x7200rpm IDE HDD (RAID10)
RAM is your bottleneck.
> apache1.3/mod_php for typo3, lighthttpd for static file - max 30 request to
Apache 1.3???
> But this bad theory because we had one big problem. After published good
> news a serve
I do not think that you speak the full truth.
I`m support typo3 news site 2 year ago. 3500 lines of a configuration for
tt_news written by different programmers.
Nearby 200.000 news in tt_new table and about 300 news categories.
Pentium D 2,8GHz CPU/4Gb RAM, 4x7200rpm IDE HDD (RAID10)
apache1.3/m
On Feb 21, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Strolz Johann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We also use typo3 in a lager project with more than 15 Million user-
> Sessions
> and about 350 Million Page-Views a year -> no Problem.
>
>
> It just depends on server-hardware and internet-connection :-)
>
> Best regards
> Strolz Joha
;
Newsgroups: typo3.english
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TYPO3-english] Fork of Typo3 ?
> This is completely false. We run a news portal with close to a million
> daily hits on TYPO3 core.
>
> Dan Osipov
> Calkins Media
> http://danosipov.com/blog/
>
This is completely false. We run a news portal with close to a million
daily hits on TYPO3 core.
Dan Osipov
Calkins Media
http://danosipov.com/blog/
Konstantin wrote:
> Sorry, but TYPO3 coudnt be applied to site with one million visited page
> per day. Typo3 has powerfull engine to quick creati
Steffen Müller wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 20.02.2009 19:29 Dmitry Dulepov wrote:
>> It is already clear. No need to be more clear...
>>
>
> I think he simply didn't get the idea of GPL, commons and copyright.
>
> Konstantin, I guess you have worked hard and tried your best.
> Now take a breath and read
Konstantin schrieb am 02/21/2009 08:51 AM Uhr:
> Ну ты и ошибка нации, обычно русские поддерживают русских даже если и не
> по теме. /* sorry its in Ru */
What do you expect? This is a TYPO3 mailinglist! We care about TYPO3, we
depend on it and therefore protect TYPO3's intellectual property.
Put
Ну ты и ошибка нации, обычно русские поддерживают русских даже если и не по
теме. /* sorry its in Ru */
"Dmitry Dulepov" сообщил/сообщила в новостях следующее:
news:mailman.1.1235199655.12887.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
> Hi!
>
> Konstantin wrote:
>> My dear friend, i hope you have 1
Hi!
Konstantin wrote:
> My dear friend, i hope you have 10 minuts to download source and verify
> is it copy of Typo3 or not.
It is better if you move out of this list. No one wants you here.
--
Dmitry Dulepov
TYPO3 core team
"Sometimes they go bad. No one knows why" (Cameron, TSCC, "Dungeons&D
My dear friend, i hope you have 10 minuts to download source and verify is
it copy of Typo3 or not.
Thanks for attention.
"Tyler Kraft" сообщил/сообщила в новостях
следующее:
news:mailman.1.1235189312.15288.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
Sorry... yes very sorry is what it is! And it
Sorry... yes very sorry is what it is! And it is what you should be
This is just shameful. To start with you went on about how it was all
original and nothing form typo3. And now it all starts to unravel.
Everything, not just the look of the BE, is from typo3.
I think it's easy for all of u
Sorry, but TYPO3 coudnt be applied to site with one million visited page per
day. Typo3 has powerfull engine to quick creating site in style: "create and
forget". If you want create news portal or power social network - you should
use other engine. So true. I know what i say becouse i develop si
Hi.
On 20.02.2009 19:29 Dmitry Dulepov wrote:
> It is already clear. No need to be more clear...
>
I think he simply didn't get the idea of GPL, commons and copyright.
Konstantin, I guess you have worked hard and tried your best.
Now take a breath and read a bit about commons, maybe something b
Hi!
Konstantin wrote:
> Ok, so - i'll rewrite xml2array() and may be 1-2 functions. Think then
> it'll be clear.
It is already clear. No need to be more clear...
--
Dmitry Dulepov
TYPO3 core team
"Sometimes they go bad. No one knows why" (Cameron, TSCC, "Dungeons&Dragons")
_
Ok, so - i'll rewrite xml2array() and may be 1-2 functions. Think then it'll
be clear.
"Dan Osipov" сообщил/сообщила в новостях
следующее:
news:mailman.1.1235151224.15662.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
> Removing all mentions of TYPO3 from the code and design doesn't make it a
> brand
Removing all mentions of TYPO3 from the code and design doesn't make it
a brand new CMS. It's clearly obvious that the bulk of the code is still
from TYPO3 core, and as such it violates GPL.
Design is not the problem - but its something that gives it away.
Dan Osipov
Calkins Media
http://danosi
Yes, as i supposed main problem - design. Okey, it'll be changed, think
color gamut to change, css.. etc
About rendering process. I use MVC, not any Typo3 feature. So besides
constant there are no any remarks of code. Ok.
"Xavier Perseguers" сообщил/сообщила в новостях
следующее:
news:mail
Hi,
> Konstantin wrote:
>> sorry, not agree
>> please, look in code and you'll see that Telenok - very origunal CMS
>> without using any core idea of Typo3 and code.
>
> Yeees, just search for the "TYPO3" in the code and you will see.
>
> You are a liar.
I did not look your code very deeply
Dear Dmitry, I think you understand after looking in code that we couldnt
say - "Telenok is rebrand of Typo3".
Thanks.
"Dmitry Dulepov" сообщил/сообщила в новостях следующее:
news:mailman.1.1235148086.9513.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
> Hi!
>
> Konstantin wrote:
>> sorry, not agree
Hi!
Konstantin wrote:
> sorry, not agree
> please, look in code and you'll see that Telenok - very origunal CMS
> without using any core idea of Typo3 and code.
Yeees, just search for the "TYPO3" in the code and you will see.
You are a liar.
--
Dmitry Dulepov
TYPO3 core team
"Sometimes the
sorry, not agree
please, look in code and you'll see that Telenok - very origunal CMS without
using any core idea of Typo3 and code.
"Dmitry Dulepov" сообщил/сообщила в новостях следующее:
news:mailman.1.1235131724.1201.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
> Hi!
>
> Pilot wrote:
>> Hello! Thin
Konstantin schrieb:
> Yes, it's own CMS. There are no code from Typo3. Only BE design.
you are a crappy liar!
1.) common_classes\class.cmf_div.php
I doubt you have written this code yourself because the comment says
---
// In TYPO3 we expect that the charset of XML content is NOT handled in
Le Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:08:44 +0200, Dmitry Dulepov a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> Pilot wrote:
>> Hello! Think it will be interesting for you. Hope to hear your opinion.
>>
>> http://telenok.org/en/possibilities/#video
>
> I am one of many people who develop TYPO3. I find this disgusting: -
> stealing oth
Hi!
Pilot wrote:
> Hello! Think it will be interesting for you. Hope to hear your opinion.
>
> http://telenok.org/en/possibilities/#video
I am one of many people who develop TYPO3. I find this disgusting:
- stealing other's people work
- claiming it as your own
- removing copyrights (illegal act
Hi.
On 20.02.2009 05:43 Konstantin wrote:
> Yes, it's own CMS. There are no code from Typo3. Only BE design.
>
Good one!
You triggered my first laugh today. Thanks.
In return, I offer you some reading tips:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic
(especially the se
Marcus Krause schrieb:
> Konstantin schrieb am 02/20/2009 05:43 AM Uhr:
>> Yes, it's own CMS. There are no code from Typo3. Only BE design.
>
> Doubt that, cmf/index.php code looks familiar.
> + namings
> + icons
or look at all other files with the naming alt_*.php
stylesheet.css is a copy paste
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Marcus Krause
Datum: 20.02.2009 10:54:
> Konstantin schrieb am 02/20/2009 05:43 AM Uhr:
>> Yes, it's own CMS. There are no code from Typo3. Only BE design.
>
> Doubt that, cmf/index.php code looks familiar.
> + namings
> + icons
>
>
>> Also you can do
Konstantin schrieb am 02/20/2009 05:43 AM Uhr:
> Yes, it's own CMS. There are no code from Typo3. Only BE design.
Doubt that, cmf/index.php code looks familiar.
+ namings
+ icons
> Also you can download source. I asked becouse dont want to have any
> problems in future.
Have a look at http://gp
Sebastian Gebhard schrieb:
I wish you
> the best, but please leave TYPO3 alone.
Take Joomla! they have a better
usability anyway
___
TYPO3-english mailing list
TYPO3-english@lists.netfielders.de
http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3
Konstantin schrieb:
> Yes, it's own CMS. There are no code from Typo3. Only BE design.
1. If there's no code from TYPO3 it's not a fork. If you really would
create a TYPO3 fork you could only publish it as open source software.
2. Design is also protected as it is the intellectual property of TY
Well, of course, design of site should be changed. I'm single developer and
didnt any advertising anywhere.
In maillist I want to show how see usability of Typo3 BE.
"Andreas Becker" сообщил/сообщила в новостях следующее:
news:mailman.43812.1235106200.2904.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de.
Dear Konstantin
But why are you using the same Website design like TYPO3.com?
Do you want that people think it is TYPO3? or that it belongs to the TYPO3
Community?
What about the licence - as you are using parts of TYPO3. I can only find
that a company gets named all over your License.
Andi
__
Yes, it's own CMS. There are no code from Typo3. Only BE design.
Also you can download source. I asked becouse dont want to have any problems
in future.
"Andreas Becker" сообщил/сообщила в новостях следующее:
news:mailman.43805.1235103504.2904.typo3-engl...@lists.netfielders.de...
> Hi Pilot =
Sorry I have forgotten something
http://telenok.com/cmf/
Andi
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Andreas Becker wrote:
> Hi Pilot = Please use a real Name Konstantin V Kiselevich
>
> It is not really funny what you are presenting here. And it is even less
> funny that you don't tell that you dev
Hi Pilot = Please use a real Name Konstantin V Kiselevich
It is not really funny what you are presenting here. And it is even less
funny that you don't tell that you developed obviously this system as the
domains belong to you! It would be much nicer if you would integrate your
features into TYPO3
Hello! Think it will be interesting for you. Hope to hear your opinion.
http://telenok.org/en/possibilities/#video
Thanks.
___
TYPO3-english mailing list
TYPO3-english@lists.netfielders.de
http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-
52 matches
Mail list logo
