Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Christian
Zenker wrote:
> Am 27.07.2009, 15:23 Uhr, schrieb Jason Lefkowitz
> :
>
>> Hey everybody...
>>
>> For as long as I've been using TYPO3, it has seemed very oriented
>> towards using XHTML as its chosen markup syntax. See, for example, how
>> CONFIG.doc
Am 27.07.2009, 15:23 Uhr, schrieb Jason Lefkowitz
:
> Hey everybody...
>
> For as long as I've been using TYPO3, it has seemed very oriented
> towards using XHTML as its chosen markup syntax. See, for example, how
> CONFIG.doctype provides options for setting your site's DOCTYPE
> declarat
Jigal van Hemert wrote:
> I found a "discussion" (two postings :-) ) about this on the content
> rendering project list:
> http://lists.netfielders.de/pipermail/typo3-project-content-rendering/2009-May/001187.html
>
>
> Doesn't seem to be a priority 1 issue.
Yeah, there's a bug open in the bugt
Hi Jason,
(Apologies if this is posted twice, but I haven't seen my reply in the
newsgroup, so I think it may be lost in cyberspace)
Jason Lefkowitz wrote:
> For as long as I've been using TYPO3, it has seemed very oriented
> towards using XHTML as its chosen markup syntax. See, for example,
>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Niels
Pardon wrote:
> Jason Lefkowitz schrieb:
>> -- Jason
>>
>> (who'd be happy to help in that effort, just tell him how)
>
>
> I think would have to provide an HTML5 compatible alternative to
> css_styled_content, but I may be wrong with this assumption.
It'll
Jason Lefkowitz schrieb:
> -- Jason
>
> (who'd be happy to help in that effort, just tell him how)
I think would have to provide an HTML5 compatible alternative to
css_styled_content, but I may be wrong with this assumption.
Greets,
Niels
___
TYPO3-e
> Well, then let "the developers" use plain-sucky HTML5 and we'll stick
to the XML variant. Agreed?
I agree that there's lots of things in HTML5 as it stands now that are
not very elegant. But I don't understand why there's pushback against
moving away from the "XHTML Or Nothing" mentality.
P
I don't think this ever going to be any problem.
And TYPO3 isn't using proper XHTML, but XHTML coding style served as
text/html. Proper XHTML has to be served as application/xhtml+xml.
Personally I find the debate between HTML and XHTML advocates more and
less theoretical fuzz.
And HTML 5 will
Hi.
On 27.07.09 15:23, Jason Lefkowitz wrote:
> (See http://www.w3.org/2009/06/xhtml-faq for details.) While HTML5 will
> offer an XHTML-style XML serialization, it's becoming pretty clear that
> this "flavor" of HTML5 will not be the primary one developers will be
> using.
Well, then let "the de
Hey everybody...
For as long as I've been using TYPO3, it has seemed very oriented
towards using XHTML as its chosen markup syntax. See, for example, how
CONFIG.doctype provides options for setting your site's DOCTYPE
declaration to any flavor of XHTML you wish, but does not include
options fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
