Ping? This should go into the v2009.01 release.
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> ---
> .../README.nios_CONFIG_SYS_NIOS_CPU|0
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> rename README.nios_CONFIG_SYS_NIOS_
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:02:26PM -0200, Alemao wrote:
> > I'm guessing that 1.2.0 was a BSP u-boot, that was not upstream. I don't
> > think upstream 1.2.0 had UPM NAND support.
>
> You are right, there were no UPM support on U-boot-1.2.0.
> I used patches sended by Anton from here:
>
> http:/
Hello,
I'm hacking U-Boot to a new at91sam9261 board and would like to include
a little bit low level init code (pll, sdram, etc.).
Normally, in U-Boot it is assumed that on at91 plattforms the bootstrap
code lives in dataflash which do the job.
On the board I'm hacking there isn't any dataflash
Dear sir,
My new kernel refuses to boot up complaining about invalid machine id.
(providing that my old kernel (2.6.16) works fine, while new ones (2.6.27 or
2.6.28) refuse to boot up.
I have tried looking up and bdinfo shows the correct information (
0x0106) but it reads r1 as (r1 = 0x21e
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:55:54PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> This patch renames NAND_MAX_CHIPS to CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS and
> changes the default from 8 to 1 for the legacy and the new MTD
> NAND layer. This allows to remove all NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions
> in the board config files b
On Friday 16 January 2009 03:37:40 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <1231493902-7043-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> > The netcat utility likes to exit when it receives an empty packet (as it
> > thinks this means EOF). This can easily occur when working with command
> > line edi
This patch renames NAND_MAX_CHIPS to CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS and
changes the default from 8 to 1 for the legacy and the new MTD
NAND layer. This allows to remove all NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions
in the board config files because none of the boards use multi
chip support (NAND_MAX_CHIPS > 1) so far.
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> In message <49703e5b.1080...@grandegger.com> you wrote:
>> Yep, in the meantime I realized that it's already pre-set in
>> include/linux/mtd/nand.h:
>>
>> /* The maximum number of NAND chips in an array */
>> #ifndef NAND_MAX_CHIPS
>> #define NAND_MA
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:53:29PM +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
>
> 2009/1/14 Paal Bakken :
> > I have problems with usb mass storage in u-boot.
> > We have our own at91sam9263 board, but I experience exactly the same
> > problems on the standard at91sam9263ek. And the usb-port AND m
> I'm guessing that 1.2.0 was a BSP u-boot, that was not upstream. I don't
> think upstream 1.2.0 had UPM NAND support.
You are right, there were no UPM support on U-boot-1.2.0.
I used patches sended by Anton from here:
http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH-v2-0-5--mpc83xx%3A-MPC8360E-RDK-related-patches
L. A. Linden Levy wrote:
> Can someone tell me how to use the mii command? I have the following
> from a dump:
>
> uBOOT=>> mii dump
> MII not complete
> 0. () -- PHY control register --
> (8000:8000) 0.15= 1reset
> (4000:4000) 0.14= 1loopback
> (
On 17:59 Fri 16 Jan , Jacky Lam wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
> device?
no, maybe MTP will be simplest to implement
>
> Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
> DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgra
Dear "Jacky Lam",
In message <39811fe10901160153s2c9e1f63s70481667fe792...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
> device?
No, it does not. A lot of infrastructure for that is missing, for
example writable file systems to name jus
You are right, there were no UPM support on U-boot-1.2.0.
I used patches sended by Anton from here:
http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH-v2-0-5--mpc83xx%3A-MPC8360E-RDK-related-patches-td14717360.html#a14717487
If I use the latest upstream I will have to do a lot of validations.
If a patch nand core, als
Hi Ulf,
On Friday 16 January 2009, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> tor 2008-12-11 klockan 12:11 +0100 skrev Stefan Roese:
> > This patch adds the CONFIG_FLASH_NOT_MEM_MAPPED define which can be
> > used on boards where the NOR FLASH is not memory-mapped and
> > special accessor functions are needed to acc
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear all,
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgrade)?
I have first seen this on openmoko.org and seems they use u-boot as
well. However, when I look a
Dear all,
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgrade)?
I have first seen this on openmoko.org and seems they use u-boot as
well. However, when I look a
Dear all,
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgrade)?
I have first seen this on openmoko.org and seems they use u-boot as
well. However, when I look a
Dear all,
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgrade)?
I have first seen this on openmoko.org and seems they use u-boot as
well. However, when I look a
Dear all,
Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
device?
Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
DFU(Universal Serial Bus Device Firmware Upgrade)?
I have first seen this on openmoko.org and seems they use u-boot as
well. However, when I look a
Dear Jeff,
In message you
wrote:
>
> 1.Does anyone have a patch for the mpc5121e for NAND booting where
> there is no NOR flash in the system?
Not yet. I think Freescale / STX are working on this.
> 2.Are there any patches that allow u-boot to be build in cygwin
> for a PPC target?
W
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1231493902-7043-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The netcat utility likes to exit when it receives an empty packet (as it
> thinks this means EOF). This can easily occur when working with command
> line editing as this behavior will be triggered wh
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1231493897-7012-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The recvfrom() function takes a socklen_t, not an int.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
> ---
> tools/ncb.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best re
Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
In message <29ab51dc0901151903x519540bdnd8bdf9b0c8d50...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Please pull u-boot-sh master branch.
>
> Best regards,
> Nobuhiro
>
>
> The following changes since commit 0e3ece33801e377be67ffa29f083421ad820f28b:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
>
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <200901141139.37554...@denx.de> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 5f01ea63a6c263767f548b4f61880b08f7850ffc:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git:/
Dear Wolfgang,
In message <49703e5b.1080...@grandegger.com> you wrote:
>
> Yep, in the meantime I realized that it's already pre-set in
> include/linux/mtd/nand.h:
>
> /* The maximum number of NAND chips in an array */
> #ifndef NAND_MAX_CHIPS
> #define NAND_MAX_CHIPS 8
> #endif
27 matches
Mail list logo
