Re: [U-Boot] How !, Adding a New Device to U-Boot.

Dear renjith kumar, In message a8474bd70903181921p383be5aatcf36a1727f8f3...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: I was wondering , is there any Discussion or document that describe the way how I can Add a new device to u-Boot. There is the README, and there is the U-Boot home page, especially

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] mtd: add some at45 spi flash support

On Sunday 04 January 2009 01:44:07 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: - AT45DB321D - AT45DB161D - AT45DB081D - AT45DB041D - AT45DB021D - AT45DB011D Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com whatever happened to this patch ? it isnt in mainline, i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Coldfire: I2C: Update I2CFDR frequency divider 0x0E value from 192 to 204

Hello Richard, Richard Retanubun wrote: From 9a7a9dfb1ed367b275bc19f7c40c98b63de75fb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:52:35 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update I2CFDR frequency divider 0x0E value from 192 to 204. This

[U-Boot] [PATCH] UBIFS: Missing offset relocation for compressor 'none'

On systems where U-Boot is linked to another address than it really lays (e.g. backup image), calls via function pointers must be fixed with a '+= gd-reloc_off'. This was not done for none_compr in ubifs_compressors_init() what leads to system crash on ubifsmount command. Signed-off-by: Michael

Re: [U-Boot] How !, Adding a New Device to U-Boot.

Dear Wolfgang Denk, Yes , this is the main configuration changes that I need to worry abt. One quick Doubt, here Did you mean, a Same Sequoia configuration can still be OK for this, so that it can list out the two devices (FPGA in EBC and FPGA in PCI interfaces) ?? (provided the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] UBIFS: Missing offset relocation for compressor 'none'

Michael Lawnick said the following: On systems where U-Boot is linked to another address than it really lays (e.g. backup image), calls via function pointers must be fixed with a '+= gd-reloc_off'. This was not done for none_compr in ubifs_compressors_init() what leads to system crash on

Re: [U-Boot] About PCI of U-BOOT of CANYONLANDS

Hi Kazuaki, Stefan, Kazuaki Ichinohe wrote: This is a problem that the memory space of BAR2 is inaccessible. Even if the value of VIDEO_IO_OFFSET is changed, the problem is not solved. It is a log that you demanded as follows. Thanks! Now I see this too. Previously you have mentioned that

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] UBIFS: Missing offset relocation for compressor 'none'

On systems where U-Boot is linked to another address than it really lays (e.g. backup image), calls via function pointers must be fixed with a '+= gd-reloc_off'. This was not done for none_compr in ubifs_compressors_init() what leads to system crash on ubifsmount command. Signed-off-by: Michael

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Separate mtdparts command from jffs2

On Thursday 19 March 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote: diff --git a/README b/README index 43fb1c0..c59652d 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -633,6 +633,7 @@ The following options need to be configured: CONFIG_CMD_MII * MII utility commands CONFIG_CMD_NAND

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8 v2] UBIFS: Implement read-only UBIFS support in U-Boot (Part 1)

Hi Wolfgang, On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote: This patchset adds UBIFS read-only support to U-Boot. The following commands are implemented: - ubifsmount Mount an UBIFS volume - ubifsls List a directory of the mounted UBIFS volume - ubifsload Load a file

Re: [U-Boot] How !, Adding a New Device to U-Boot.

Dear renjith kumar, A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? And you not only top-post, you also full-quote. Please make sure to read

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] mtd: add some at45 spi flash support

On 03:18 Thu 19 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 04 January 2009 01:44:07 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: - AT45DB321D - AT45DB161D - AT45DB081D - AT45DB041D - AT45DB021D - AT45DB011D Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Separate mtdparts command from jffs2

Dear Stefan Roese, In message 200903191041.45190...@denx.de you wrote: ... We drop 2000 lines of code here, which represents a lot of important functions. I wonder if this patch has ever been tested? Yes, it has. I generated this patch with the find-copies-harder option. This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Separate mtdparts command from jffs2

Dear Stefan Roese, In message 1237451843-8870-1-git-send-email...@denx.de you wrote: Currently the mtdparts commands are included in the jffs2 command support. This doesn't make sense anymore since other commands (e.g. UBI) use this infrastructure as well now. This patch separates the mtdparts

Re: [U-Boot] About PCI of U-BOOT of CANYONLANDS

Hi Anatolij, Stefan, Thank you for the reply. I confirmed your patch source. However, the exception was generated. U-Boot 2009.01 ( 3月 19 2009 - 18:41:36) CPU: AMCC PowerPC 460EX Rev. A at 800 MHz (PLB=200, OPB=100, EBC=100 MHz)

[U-Boot] USB EHCI driver

Hi, I'm developing an USB EHCI driver for ADS5121e. Now , I completed initialization sequence for my SOC EHCI Controller. My scope is to use with mass storage, but I think that ehci core layer don't work correctly. Do somebody use EHCI CORE layer for Mass storage and it was ok? Thank you. --

Re: [U-Boot] About PCI of U-BOOT of CANYONLANDS

Kazuaki Ichinohe wrote: Hi Anatolij, Stefan, Thank you for the reply. I confirmed your patch source. However, the exception was generated. U-Boot 2009.01 ( 3月 19 2009 - 18:41:36) CPU: AMCC PowerPC 460EX Rev. A at 800 MHz (PLB=200,

Re: [U-Boot] USB EHCI driver

Hi, FrancescoVT wrote: Hi, I'm developing an USB EHCI driver for ADS5121e. Now , I completed initialization sequence for my SOC EHCI Controller. My scope is to use with mass storage, but I think that ehci core layer don't work correctly. Do somebody use EHCI CORE layer for Mass storage and

Re: [U-Boot] About PCI of U-BOOT of CANYONLANDS

Kazuaki Ichinohe wrote: Now register access to BAR2 seems to work. What was the value of VIDEO_IO_OFFSET used with this latest test? VIDEO_IO_OFFSET is 0xD080 Try to set VIDEO_IO_OFFSET to 0xD800, it should work. The value of 0xD080 is wrong, now I see it after double-checking

Re: [U-Boot] About PCI of U-BOOT of CANYONLANDS

Try to set VIDEO_IO_OFFSET to 0xD800, it should work. The value of 0xD080 is wrong, now I see it after double-checking the PCI/IO map in the PPC460EX manual. Sorry, my fault. The PCI memory space is accessible. However, the video output cannot be confirmed. Why ? Regards, Kazuaki

Re: [U-Boot] How !, Adding a New Device to U-Boot.

Dear Wolfgang Denk friendz, And you not only top-post, you also full-quote. Please make sure to read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html I am sorry for my crazy randoms mails. Let me correct it henceforth. Thanking you for your supports. -- *Rgrds, Renjith*.

Re: [U-Boot] About PCI of U-BOOT of CANYONLANDS

Now register access to BAR2 seems to work. What was the value of VIDEO_IO_OFFSET used with this latest test? VIDEO_IO_OFFSET is 0xD080 Regards, Kazuaki Ichinohe Anatolij Gustschin wrote: Kazuaki Ichinohe wrote: Hi Anatolij, Stefan, Thank you for the reply. I confirmed your patch

Re: [U-Boot] USB EHCI driver

Hi, this is the report of my problem. I have initialized the SOC FSL EHCI controller, and I typed usb start from u-boot console. I can see controller and mass storage, but mass storage doesn't seem to be correctly configurated. Can you explain to me what I must expect? Thank you very much,

Re: [U-Boot] About PCI of U-BOOT of CANYONLANDS

Kazuaki Ichinohe wrote: Try to set VIDEO_IO_OFFSET to 0xD800, it should work. The value of 0xD080 is wrong, now I see it after double-checking the PCI/IO map in the PPC460EX manual. Sorry, my fault. The PCI memory space is accessible. However, the video output cannot be confirmed.

Re: [U-Boot] USB EHCI driver

Which SOC you are trying to use? I had faced some more issues while porting the USB core layer related to descriptors also. Regards Maneesh -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of FrancescoVT Sent: Thursday, March

Re: [U-Boot] USB EHCI driver

I have written an initialization sequence for Freescale MPC5121e. This CPU contain an OTG and DR module with UTMI+ phy. I tested Linux USB driver for this controller and it works. Infact I analyzed what Linux driver code did and I applied it to my code in u-boot. Gupta Maneesh-B18878 wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] CFI: geometry reversal for STMicro M29W320DT

Hi Stefan, Just following up on this patch, the only other action I've seen on with regards to this is to fake the device identification from top-boot to bottom boot, but I think this is more 'masking' the problem and I don't have enough visibility to see if it is a safe thing to do. In any

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-cfi-flash

Hi Wolfgang, please pull one last-minute fix for cfi-flash: The following changes since commit 069f4364d807d7fdea3de7385ad2f8d83c587aec: Mike Frysinger (1): smc911x_eeprom: update register API are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx: Add support for additional e500mc features

* Enable backside L2 * e500mc no longer has timebase enable in HID (moved to CCSR register) Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org --- cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c | 13 + cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c | 64 +++- cpu/mpc85xx/release.S |

[U-Boot] [PATCH] digsy_mtc: Fix compile warnings.

Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Bernacki g...@semihalf.com --- This patch should be applied to the next branch. cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu.c |3 ++- include/configs/digsy_mtc.h |2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu.c b/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu.c index

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 2/2] Add support for the digsy MTC board.

Please provide a patch against next (which I will then squash with the original patch...). I've just sent patch which fixes compile warnings. regards, Grzesiek ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Coldire: mcf52x2: Improve gcc version detection

From 2cfa4b5789a6c01f6120663cc36ca751e2e5d172 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:12:47 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Improved gcc version detection for more optimized code. This patch makes the gcc version detection more flexible.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3 v3] UBIFS Support for U-Boot

Changes in v3: - Patchseries split now into 3 logical pieces instead of splitting it into 8 chunks of 100k Changes in v2: - Now symbolic links are handled correctly The following changes since commit 069f4364d807d7fdea3de7385ad2f8d83c587aec: Mike Frysinger (1): smc911x_eeprom:

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v3] Add LZO decompressor support

This patch adds LZO decompression support to U-Boot. It is needed for the upcoming UBIFS support, since UBIFS uses LZO as default compressor/ decompressor. Since we only support read-only in UBIFS only the decompressor is needed. All this is copied with minor changes from the current Linux kernel

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 v3] UBIFS: Add UBIFS commands

This patchset adds these UBIFS related commands: - ubifsmount Mount an UBIFS volume - ubifsls List a directory of the mounted UBIFS volume - ubifsload Load a file from the mounted UBIFS volume to memory Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de --- Changes in v3: - Patchseries split now

[U-Boot] Coldfire: MCF5270: Compiling u-boot 2009.03-rc2 with gcc 4.3.3 and binutils 2.19.1 results in a u-boot that fails relocation to RAM.

Greetings, I am trying to x86 cross-compile u-boot 2009.03-rc2 for the MCF5270 with gcc 4.3.3 and binutils 2.19.1 results in a u-boot that fails its relocation to RAM. My boot sequence is this U-Boot 2009.03-rc2dvl-00030-g28b1dbe (Mar 19 2009 - 10:21:06) CPU: Freescale ColdFire MCF5270 rev.

Re: [U-Boot] USB EHCI driver

Have you faced any issues w.r.t accessing the root hub Device Descriptors? Regards Maneesh -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of FrancescoVT Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:20 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject:

[U-Boot] MIPS build status (Re: CUSTODIANS: Urgent boarding call for flight 2009.03)

Hello, Wolfgang Denk wrote: If anything should still be missing, please respond *now*. My intention is to push out the 2009.03 release on schedule, i. e. on Saturday, March 21, 2009. At the moment I am not planning for another release candidate. * With GCC 4.2.3, all MIPS targets

Re: [U-Boot] USB EHCI driver

No. I didn't touch the EHCI core layer. I expected that it work. What do you think about? THANKS. Regars Francesco Gupta Maneesh-B18878 wrote: Have you faced any issues w.r.t accessing the root hub Device Descriptors? Regards Maneesh -Original Message- From:

[U-Boot] U-boot versions, DHCP difference

Hello, I'm working on booting Linux from a Virtex 5 ml507 board using U-boot version 1.3.4. I have successfully booted Linux on an AVNET ml405 board before with no problems, but that was with an earlier version of u-boot. I have narrowed down the problem to DHCP Request errors. It sends the

Re: [U-Boot] CUSTODIANS: Urgent boarding call for flight 2009.03

On 00:26 Tue 17 Mar , Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hi Custodians (and everybody else), can you please check if all urgent patches have been added to the U-Boot master branch? If anything should still be missing, please respond *now*. My intention is to push out the 2009.03 release on

Re: [U-Boot] CUSTODIANS: Urgent boarding call for flight 2009.03

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: make[1]: In file included from clk.c:24: /private/u-boot-arm/include/asm/io.h:129: error: conflicting types for 'virt_to_phys' /private/u-boot-arm/include/asm/io.h:80: error: previous definition of 'virt_to_phys' was here Haavard could you take a

Re: [U-Boot] USB EHCI driver

I have integrated last USB u-boot code (2009.03rc) into my code and now I get this: = usb start (Re)start USB... USB: USB InitCompleted! USB InitCompleted! Register 10011 NbrPorts 1 USB EHCI 1.00 scanning bus for devices... New Device 0 usb_control_msg: request: 0x6, requesttype:

Re: [U-Boot] CUSTODIANS: Urgent boarding call for flight 2009.03

On 18:25 Thu 19 Mar , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: make[1]: In file included from clk.c:24: /private/u-boot-arm/include/asm/io.h:129: error: conflicting types for 'virt_to_phys' /private/u-boot-arm/include/asm/io.h:80: error: previous definition of

[U-Boot] [PATCH for avr32/next] avr32: fix cacheflush.h location introducted by d8f2aa3298610b

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com --- .../asm-avr32/{ = arch-at32ap700x}/cacheflush.h |0 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename include/asm-avr32/{ = arch-at32ap700x}/cacheflush.h (100%) diff --git a/include/asm-avr32/cacheflush.h

Re: [U-Boot] Coldfire: MCF5271: Periodic HW watchdog petting and sleep function does not work.

Richard Retanubun wrote: Hi TC, TC Liew wrote: Richard, Is there a purpose that you used DTIMER 3 but not 1 or 2? FYI: DTIMER3 is currently used for system time, DTIMER0 is currently used for udelay() in u-boot. You can change the u-boot 5271's system timer in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] LPC2468 support

Dear Remco Poelstra, In message 49c25f75.3080...@duran-audio.com you wrote: Wolfgang Denk schreef: +/* Vectored Interrupt Controller (VIC) */ +#define VIC_BASE_ADDR 0xF000 +#define VICIRQStatus (*(volatile unsigned long *)(VIC_BASE_ADDR + 0x000)) +#define VICFIQStatus

Re: [U-Boot] MIPS build status (Re: CUSTODIANS: Urgent boarding call for flight 2009.03)

Dear Shinya, In message 49c26c23.2030...@ruby.dti.ne.jp you wrote: * With GCC 4.2.3, all MIPS targets builds fine without any errors. MAKEALL output is attached. Thanks. * But with GCC 4.3.2, you would see hundreds of bitops.h warnings. Besides, some could be compiled (gth2, etc.),

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-cfi-flash

Dear Stefan Roese, In message 200903191504.03104...@denx.de you wrote: Hi Wolfgang, please pull one last-minute fix for cfi-flash: The following changes since commit 069f4364d807d7fdea3de7385ad2f8d83c587aec: Mike Frysinger (1): smc911x_eeprom: update register API are

[U-Boot] Compiling api_examples/demo

What's the right way to compile api_examples/demo? I get this error jonsm...@terra:/home/apps/u-boot$ make api_examples/demo powerpc-603e-linux-gnu-gcc -g -Os -fPIC -ffixed-r14 -meabi -D__KERNEL__ -DTEXT_BASE=0xFFF0 -I/home/apps/u-boot/include -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc

Re: [U-Boot] Compiling api_examples/demo

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: What's the right way to compile api_examples/demo? CONFIG_API=y is in include/autoconf.mk instead of CONFIG_API=y Getting rid of the quotes lets it compile. -- Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com

[U-Boot] [PATCH] .gitignore for generated files in api_examples directory

From: Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com .gitignore for generated files in api_examples directory crc32.c ctype.c demo demo.bin ppcstring.S string.c vsprintf.c Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com --- api_examples/.gitignore |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)