[U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: add support for the polaris board

2009-06-30 Thread Stefano Babic
The Polaris board is based on the TrizepsIV module of Keith & Koep (http://www.keith-koep.com). Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- MAINTAINERS |5 + MAKEALL |2 ++ Makefile|7 ++- board/trizepsiv/conxs.c | 22 +++

[U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: fix USB initialization for Trizepsiv module

2009-06-30 Thread Stefano Babic
Due to change in the usb_board_init() prototype, the USB for the TrizepsIV was not correctly initialized. Removed dummy print from usb_board_stop(). Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- board/trizepsiv/conxs.c |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/trizeps

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Thomas Dörfler
Richard, Richard Stallman wrote: > > While I probably would not want to change my glucometer, the practice > of designing hardware so that people cannot change it is becoming more > and more of a threat to our freedom in general. Can you be a bit more specific on this? Which devices are you awa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/6] MX31: Add NAND SPL boot support to i.MX31 PDK board.

2009-06-30 Thread Magnus Lilja
Hi 2009/6/30 Scott Wood : > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > +ifeq ($(debug),1) > +PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -DDEBUG > +endif I do not think it's board specific >>> >>> And what does that comment mean? Should I remove this, move it to >>> another file or what? >>> >

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed compilation warning in 4xx_enet.c

2009-06-30 Thread Alessio Centazzo
This patch fixes a compilation warning for some Ethernet PHY-less PPC4xx platforms (440SPE based ones) and a potential compilation error for 440SP platforms (use of undefined 'ethgroup' variable). In the original code and in case of 440SPE platforms, 'ethgroup' is initialized to -1 and never modif

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed PPC4xx debug compilation error in uic.c

2009-06-30 Thread Alessio Centazzo
This patch fixes a debug compilation error for PPC4xx platforms, all other architectures are not affected by this change. The 'handler' pointer was undefined. The fix is exercised and has effect only if DEBUG is defined. Signed-off-by: Alessio Centazzo acpa...@yahoo.com --- cpu/ppc4xx/uic.c |

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Jerry Van Baren wrote: > The discussion has mostly been emotional to date. Here are some > statistics (not necessarily perfect, but pretty close)... > > Total number of files (after removing the .git files): > $ find . -type f | wc -l > 6055 > > Number of files that are identified as being copy

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: Add esd gmbh MEESC board support

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 08:09 Tue 30 Jun , Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > This patch adds support for esd gmbh MEESC board. > The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski > --- > MAINTAINERS |4 + > MAKEALL |1 + > Makefile

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] at91: Add CAN init function

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 08:09 Tue 30 Jun , Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > To enable CAN init, CONFIG_CAN has to be defined in the board config file > and at91_can_hw_init() has to be called in the board specific code. > > CAN is available on AT91SAM9263 and AT91CAP9 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski > ---

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Robin Getz
On Tue 30 Jun 2009 15:12, Richard Stallman pondered: > > Maybe you should be working with these types of certification > authorities, rather than individual developers? > > I would be glad to do so. I have no contacts in the FDA, and I am not > so famous that mere mention of my name woul

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] XPedite5170 board support

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Initial support for Extreme Engineering Solutions XPedite5170 - a MPC8640-based 3U VPX single board computer with a PMC/XMC site. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- changes since v1: - Removed enabling of FSL DMA driver and DMA memory test MAINTAINERS |1 + MAKEALL

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Robin Getz
On Tue 30 Jun 2009 15:12, Richard Stallman pondered: > While I probably would not want to change my glucometer, the practice > of designing hardware so that people cannot change it is becoming more > and more of a threat to our freedom in general. It is simple economics - it is about consumers mak

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 02/12] fsl_dma: Add bitfield definitions for common registers

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c | 12 +- include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h | 46 + 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c index a9989ee..baf2942 100644 -

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 05/12] fsl_dma: Fix Channel Start bug in dma_check()

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
The Channel Start (CS) bit in the Mode Register (MR) should actually be cleared as the comment in the code suggests. Previously, CS was being set, not cleared. Assuming normal operation of the DMA engine, this change shouldn't have any real affect. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- drivers/dma/fs

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 03/12] fsl_dma: Use proper I/O access functions

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c | 32 ++-- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c index baf2942..33ea828 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c @@ -27

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 08/12] 85xx, 86xx: Move dma_init() call to common code

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- board/mpc8540eval/mpc8540eval.c |2 +- board/sbc8560/sbc8560.c |2 +- cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c |4 +++- cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen1.c |2 -- cpu/mpc86xx/cpu_init.c |3 +++ 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/12] fsl_dma: Break out common memory initialization function

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- board/mpc8540eval/mpc8540eval.c | 32 +--- board/sbc8560/sbc8560.c | 32 +--- cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen1.c | 26 +- drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c | 32 ++

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/12] 83xx: Replace CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRC references

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Update 83xx architecture's CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRC references to CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRCONTROLLER, which other Freescale architectures use Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- board/freescale/mpc8360emds/mpc8360emds.c |4 ++-- board/freescale/mpc8360erdk/mpc8360erdk.c |4 ++-- board/freescal

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 12/12] 83xx: Add support for fsl_dma driver

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser Reviewed-by: Ira W. Snyder Tested-by: Ira W. Snyder --- cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c| 85 -- cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c | 40 ++-- drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c| 64 --- inclu

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/12] fsl_dma: Move dma function prototypes to common header file

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen1.c|4 include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h |5 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen1.c b/cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen1.c index b188906..9fc498e 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen1.c +++ b/cpu/mpc85xx

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/12] fsl_dma: Make DMA transactions snoopable

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Make DMA transactions snoopable so that CPUs can keep caches up-to-date. This allows dma transactions to be used for operations such as memory copies without any additional cache control operations. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/12] 85xx, 86xx: Break out DMA code to a common file

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
DMA support is now enabled via the CONFIG_FSL_DMA define instead of the previous CONFIG_DDR_ECC Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c| 47 --- cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c| 55 --- drivers/dma/Makefile |1 + drivers/dma/fsl_

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/12] 8xxx: Rename dma_xfer() to dmacpy()

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Also update dmacpy()'s argument order to match memcpy's and use phys_addr_t/phy_size_t for address/size arguments Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- board/mpc8540eval/mpc8540eval.c | 25 - board/sbc8560/sbc8560.c | 25 - cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 04/12] fsl_dma: Add support for arbitrarily large transfers

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Support DMA transfers larger than the DMA controller's limit of (2 ^ 26 - 1) bytes Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c | 40 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/12] 8xxx dma updates

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
This patch series attempts to clean up the DMA implementation for the 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx architectures. The changes include: - consolidate 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx structures and code - add defines for bitfields - use proper IO accessors - add support for arbitrarily large transfer sizes - rename dm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Correct header define

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 18:11 Tue 30 Jun , Simon Kagstrom wrote: > Correct define typo (. -> ,) > > Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom > --- > include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/mpp.h |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Applied to u-boot-arm Best Regards, J. _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/6] MX31: Add NAND SPL boot support to i.MX31 PDK board.

2009-06-30 Thread Scott Wood
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: +ifeq ($(debug),1) +PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -DDEBUG +endif >>> I do not think it's board specific >> And what does that comment mean? Should I remove this, move it to >> another file or what? >> > Personnaly I'll active it manually in the file not

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Robin Getz
On Tue 30 Jun 2009 15:12, Richard Stallman pondered: > > That is great - and I applaud your efforts. I think that the work > you are doing is valuable, and the contributions you have made have > been critically important to the free and closed software developments > that people to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/6] MX31: Add NAND SPL boot support to i.MX31 PDK board.

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 21:29 Tue 30 Jun , Magnus Lilja wrote: > Hi > > 2009/6/30 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD : > >> >> + > >> >> +#include > >> >> +#include > >> >> + > >> >> +#define CCM_CCMR_SETUP               0x074B0BF5 > >> >> +#define CCM_PDR0_SETUP_532MHZ        (PDR0_CSI_PODF(0x1ff) | > >> >> PDR0

[U-Boot] Omap3 fix compiler warnings

2009-06-30 Thread Tom Rix
This patch is against the arm/next branch. This fixes OMAP3 boards building warning cpu.c: In function 'cleanup_before_linux': cpu.c:64: warning: implicit declaration of function 'v7_flush_dcache_all' cpu.c:64: warning: implicit declaration of function 'get_device_type Now OMAP3 has clean a bu

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] OMAP3 Fix compiler warning for v7_flush_dcache_all

2009-06-30 Thread Tom Rix
On build of omap3 targets in MAKEALL, the *.ERR files have cpu.c: In function 'cleanup_before_linux': cpu.c:64: warning: implicit declaration of function 'v7_flush_dcache_all' cpu.c:64: warning: implicit declaration of function 'get_device_type The functions v7_flush_dcache_all and get_device_typ

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/6] MX31: Add NAND SPL boot support to i.MX31 PDK board.

2009-06-30 Thread Magnus Lilja
Hi 2009/6/30 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD : >> >> + >> >> +#include >> >> +#include >> >> + >> >> +#define CCM_CCMR_SETUP               0x074B0BF5 >> >> +#define CCM_PDR0_SETUP_532MHZ        (PDR0_CSI_PODF(0x1ff) | >> >> PDR0_PER_PODF(7) | \ >> >> +                              PDR0_HSP_POD

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/6] MX31: Add NAND SPL boot support to i.MX31 PDK board.

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> >> + > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> + > >> +#define CCM_CCMR_SETUP               0x074B0BF5 > >> +#define CCM_PDR0_SETUP_532MHZ        (PDR0_CSI_PODF(0x1ff) | > >> PDR0_PER_PODF(7) | \ > >> +                              PDR0_HSP_PODF(3) | PDR0_NFC_PODF(5) |     \ > >> +                  

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Richard Stallman
BTW, thanks for that, and GCC, and all that follows... I am glad it is useful. I hope people will recall once in a while that I did this so that users could control their computing. I wrote the GNU GPL (all versions) towards this same end. ___ U-B

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Richard Stallman
Maybe you should be working with these types of certification authorities, rather than individual developers? I would be glad to do so. I have no contacts in the FDA, and I am not so famous that mere mention of my name would make them pay attention. But maybe some of these developers cou

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Richard Stallman
That is great - and I applaud your efforts. I think that the work you are doing is valuable, and the contributions you have made have been critically important to the free and closed software developments that people to today. If you mean that my work has contrubuted to non-free soft

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Richard Stallman
> That would be a good reason for the user not to change the software in > this device. However, that does not mean he should be stopped. The FDA disagrees :) Governments often oppose people's freedom. That is why fighting for freedom is hard. They add requirements to ensure th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: add support for the polaris board

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 11:31 Tue 30 Jun , Stefano Babic wrote: > The Polaris board is based on the TrizepsIV module of > Keith & Koep (http://www.keith-koep.com). > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic > --- > MAINTAINERS |4 > MAKEALL |1 + > Makefile

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: fix USB initialization for Trizepsiv module

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 11:31 Tue 30 Jun , Stefano Babic wrote: > Due to change in the usb_board_init() prototype, the USB for > the TrizepsIV was not correctly initialized. but you also update the stop function please update the commit message Best Regards, J. ___ U-Boo

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Add support for Raidsonic ICYBOX NAS4220 board

2009-06-30 Thread Darius Augulis
This board is based on Cortina Systems networking processor CS3516. It has FA526 core, which is ARMv4 compatible. Many SoC specific definitions may be used for similar processors CS3512 and dual-core CS3518. This processor family has Gemini name. Signed-off-by: Darius Augulis --- MAINTAINERS

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] flread: new command for reading indirect mapped flashes

2009-06-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 14:44:25 Mike Frysinger wrote: > + if (dst < CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE || > + (dst + size) > (CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE + CONFIG_SYS_MAX_RAM_SIZE)) { > + printf("Error: memory area %#08lx to %#08lx is not in RAM\n", > +dst, dst + size); >

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble "booting using board info"

2009-06-30 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Mikhail Zaturenskiy wrote: >> Got it... thanks to >> "http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05111.html";. >> I added the following to the very end of >> "u-boot-2009.03/board/ep88x/ep88x.c": >> >> #if defined(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) && defined(CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP) >> void ft

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble "booting using board info"

2009-06-30 Thread Mikhail Zaturenskiy
> Got it... thanks to > "http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05111.html";. > I added the following to the very end of > "u-boot-2009.03/board/ep88x/ep88x.c": > > #if defined(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) && defined(CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP) > void ft_board_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)

[U-Boot] [PATCH] flread: new command for reading indirect mapped flashes

2009-06-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
From: Harald Krapfenbauer The current flash framework generally assumes that the flash in question is completely directly addressable. With the new weak accessor functions, that is no longer always the case. These allow us to hook up flashes whose pins are only partially directly addressable wh

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble "booting using board info"

2009-06-30 Thread Mikhail Zaturenskiy
>> If you have CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP defined (if you don't that probably is the >> answer to your missing #define question), you can run >>  fdt boardsetup >> and then >>  fdt print / >> to see what the fixed up tree looks like. > No I do not have this defined, when I include it I cannot compile >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: change env_address type from unsigned long to loff_t

2009-06-30 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:42:22PM +0900, HeungJun Kim wrote: > If use the onenand boot, the env_relocate_spec() calls mtd->read(), > and the type of the argument #2 of mtd->read() was changed to loff_t. > But, the "env_addr" type is still unsigned long, thus this patch change > the type from unsig

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Robin Getz
On Tue 30 Jun 2009 10:04, Richard Stallman pondered: > > Portable hand held medical devices - such as Glucometers. They fall > into both categories. They are medical devices, who's "bad" > software could cause a user to give them selves too much insulin > (hypoglycemia -> pass out

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:03:09PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Total number of files that are GPLv2: > $ grep -i -r 'Free Software Foundation' * | grep -i 'version 2' > > ~/ugplv2.txt > $ wc -l ~/ugplv2.txt > 4588 This assumes "version 2" and "Free Software Foundation" are on the same line...

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Correct header define

2009-06-30 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
Dear Simon Thanks for the correction. Hi Jean, How should we go ahead with this? Regards.. Prafulla . . > -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Simon Kagstrom > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:42 PM > To: U-Boot ML

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Correct header define

2009-06-30 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Correct define typo (. -> ,) Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom --- include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/mpp.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/mpp.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/mpp.h index e021a80..bc74278 100644 --- a/include/asm-

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Eric Nelson
Richard Stallman wrote: > > In 1983, almost everyone thought my ideas were foolish, but I did not > let that stop me, so now we have the GNU/Linux operating system. > BTW, thanks for that, and GCC, and all that follows... We've all been enriched by your efforts.

[U-Boot] warnings from gcc-4.4 build

2009-06-30 Thread Kumar Gala
When building the MPC8572DS_config w/gcc-4.4 I get: sys_eeprom.c: In function ‘do_mac’: sys_eeprom.c:323: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules sys_eeprom.c: In function ‘mac_read_from_eeprom’: sys_eeprom.c:395: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer wil

Re: [U-Boot] uboot iMX25 or iMX27

2009-06-30 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Hi Johan, On 6/30/09, Johann Steinbrecher wrote: > Hello, > > does anybody have experience in setting up the uboot for a iMX25 or iMX27 > processor. > Is there already a uboot configuration for those processors? > Please search on mailing list, there is patches to add U-Boot (mainstream) support

[U-Boot] uboot iMX25 or iMX27

2009-06-30 Thread Johann Steinbrecher
Hello, does anybody have experience in setting up the uboot for a iMX25 or iMX27 processor. Is there already a uboot configuration for those processors? Greetings Johann ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Atmel LCD driver GUARDTIME fix

2009-06-30 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Mark Jackson wrote: > This patch allows the guard time parameter to be set in > the Atmel LCDC driver. > > By default, the previous value of 1 is used, unless the > setting is defined elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson > --- > drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c |7 +-- > 1 files change

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Jerry, thanks a lot for your work of analyzing the current situation - I appreciate that very much. > I did *not* analyze the files for complexity and appropriateness of > copyright/license information in the file. That should be done > regardless of the results of the GPLv3 debate and the

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Richard Stallman wrote: > Files without a copyright notice and a license notice are a legal problem. > > Legally, every file is copyrighted. If there's no copyright notice, > that just means it gives no info about who the copyright holder is. > > The lack of a license notice is a problem. If th

Re: [U-Boot] Regarding Netconsole support

2009-06-30 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi, > I have enabled Netconsole option on my customized powerpc 7410 > based processor board. I have set ncip as my host machine which is connected > through serial port (Now act as debug port but i need the ethernet to be > debug port). i have set stdout and stdin as nc as mention

Re: [U-Boot] Need assistance with increasing command line size on Cavium

2009-06-30 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Garrett, > Our group is running into command line length issues with a number > of Cavium boards we have at our office (CN38xx, CN5xxx), and I was > wondering (apart from the Linux kernel command line length), where I > would look to increase the size for the command line that's passed > fr

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Richard Stallman
Files without a copyright notice and a license notice are a legal problem. Legally, every file is copyrighted. If there's no copyright notice, that just means it gives no info about who the copyright holder is. The lack of a license notice is a problem. If the file is trivial, just a few lines,

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-06-30 Thread Richard Stallman
Portable hand held medical devices - such as Glucometers. They fall into both categories. They are medical devices, who's "bad" software could cause a user to give them selves too much insulin (hypoglycemia -> pass out -> seizure -> death), or too little insulin (Hyperglycaemi

Re: [U-Boot] errno.h header -> asm-generic?

2009-06-30 Thread Michal Simek
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 13:55 Tue 30 Jun , Stefan Roese wrote: >> Hi Michal, >> >> On Tuesday 30 June 2009 12:00:55 Michal Simek wrote: >>> I found that Microblaze miss errno.h file among some other minor fault >>> which I want to fix. >>> >>> Anyway I looked at errno.h hea

Re: [U-Boot] hi, I could not understand the memsize.c, somebody help me?

2009-06-30 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi, > Thanks for your patient explanation, I acquired a lot. Glad if it helped. > I just find in linux, arch/mips/bcm47xx/prom.c, there is a segment code just > like what I suggest above. > And move the code to my old box which bootloader is redboot, it works well. > (Of > course I also tryed m

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Added support for jadecpu board using the MB86R01 'Jade' SOC from Fujitsu

2009-06-30 Thread Matthias Weisser
Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser --- MAINTAINERS |3 + MAKEALL |1 + Makefile |7 + board/syteco/jadecpu/Makefile| 55 ++ board/syteco/jadecpu/config.mk |1 + board/syteco/jadecpu/

[U-Boot] [PATCH] This patch adds support for Fujitsu MB86R01 'JADE' SOC

2009-06-30 Thread Matthias Weisser
Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser --- cpu/arm926ejs/jade/Makefile | 47 + cpu/arm926ejs/jade/timer.c | 129 include/asm-arm/arch-jade/hardware.h | 31 ++ include/asm-arm/arch-jade/jade.h | 182 ++ 4 fi

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add suport for the graphic controller included in the JADE SOC

2009-06-30 Thread Matthias Weisser
Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser --- drivers/video/jadegdc.c | 205 +++ 1 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100755 drivers/video/jadegdc.c diff --git a/drivers/video/jadegdc.c b/drivers/video/jadegdc.c new file mode 100755 i

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Added support for splash screen positioning adding by adding

2009-06-30 Thread Matthias Weisser
Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser --- drivers/video/cfb_console.c | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/video/cfb_console.c diff --git a/drivers/video/cfb_console.c b/drivers/video/cfb_console.c old mode 100644 new mode 100755

Re: [U-Boot] Undefined reference to'flash_sect_protect' in env_flash.c

2009-06-30 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi, >>> I met this compiling error, any idea? >>> >>> /common/env_flash.c:312: undefined reference to `flash_sect_protect' >>> /common/env_flash.c:316: undefined reference to `flash_sect_erase' >>> /common/env_flash.c:329: undefined reference to `flash_sect_protect' >>> make: *** [u-boot] Error 1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add pci E1000 Ethernet support for P2020 board

2009-06-30 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:56 AM, Roy Zang wrote: > From: Roy Zang > > Add pci E1000 Ethernet support for P2020 board. > Signed-off-by: Roy Zang > > --- > board/freescale/p2020ds/p2020ds.c |3 ++- > include/configs/P2020DS.h |1 + > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 8xxx: Fix PCI bus address setup for 36-bit configs

2009-06-30 Thread Kumar Gala
We want the outbound PCI memory map to end at the 4G boundary so we can maximize the amount of space available for inbound mappings if we have large amounts of memory. This matches the device tree setup in the kernel for the 36-bit physical configs for the platforms that have one (MPC8641 HPCN & M

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 86xx: Add CPU_TYPE_ENTRY support

2009-06-30 Thread Kumar Gala
Unify with 83xx and 85xx and use CPU_TYPE_ENTRY. We are going to use this to convey the # of cores and DDR width in the near future so its good to keep in sync. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c | 33 + include/asm-ppc/processor.h |2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11] fsl_dma: Move dma function prototypes to common header file

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Kumar, > >> #ifdef protection here seems kinda pointless > > > > Most boards won't have CONFIG_FSL_DMA defined, but this file will > > still > > be used in the immap_86xx.h files for padding immap_t. I figured most > > users won't have dma_init() or dmacpy() so the protection wouldn't > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11] fsl_dma: Move dma function prototypes to common header file

2009-06-30 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 22, 2009, at 6:12 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > Hi Kumar, > >>> diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h b/include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h >>> index c9ec6b5..06ecdcd 100644 >>> --- a/include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h >>> +++ b/include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h >>> @@ -94,4 +94,9 @@ typedef struct fsl_dma { >>> cha

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] usb: mpc834x: added support of the MPH USB controller in addition to the DR one

2009-06-30 Thread Valeriy Glushkov
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Glushkov --- cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c |2 ++ include/asm-ppc/immap_83xx.h | 11 ++- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c b/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c index 414565c..2fb9f99 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] usb: mpx8349itx: added support of loading images from USB storage (MPH/DR)

2009-06-30 Thread Valeriy Glushkov
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Glushkov --- include/configs/MPC8349ITX.h | 31 +-- 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/MPC8349ITX.h b/include/configs/MPC8349ITX.h index f2e574b..0ff09a0 100644 --- a/include/configs/MPC8349ITX.h ++

Re: [U-Boot] errno.h header -> asm-generic?

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 13:55 Tue 30 Jun , Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Tuesday 30 June 2009 12:00:55 Michal Simek wrote: > > I found that Microblaze miss errno.h file among some other minor fault > > which I want to fix. > > > > Anyway I looked at errno.h header file for all arch which are in U-BOOT an

Re: [U-Boot] errno.h header -> asm-generic?

2009-06-30 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Michal, On Tuesday 30 June 2009 12:00:55 Michal Simek wrote: > I found that Microblaze miss errno.h file among some other minor fault > which I want to fix. > > Anyway I looked at errno.h header file for all arch which are in U-BOOT and > I found that almost all arch use the same file that's wh

[U-Boot] Antw: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] MX31: Add NAND SPL boot support to i.MX31 PDK board.

2009-06-30 Thread Ulrich Gerster
Hello, thanks for this explanation. It help a lot to understand what is going on in the NAND_SPL. But I have an addittional question. I'm wondering where the initialization of the ram is done? Because I think the ram has to be set up before copying the 2kB preloader into the ram. Another thin

[U-Boot] errno.h header -> asm-generic?

2009-06-30 Thread Michal Simek
Hi All, I found that Microblaze miss errno.h file among some other minor fault which I want to fix. Anyway I looked at errno.h header file for all arch which are in U-BOOT and I found that almost all arch use the same file that's why I think that will be good to create (maybe asm-generic) fold

[U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: fix USB initialization for Trizepsiv module

2009-06-30 Thread Stefano Babic
Due to change in the usb_board_init() prototype, the USB for the TrizepsIV was not correctly initialized. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- board/trizepsiv/conxs.c |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/trizepsiv/conxs.c b/board/trizepsiv/conxs.c index

[U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: add support for the polaris board

2009-06-30 Thread Stefano Babic
The Polaris board is based on the TrizepsIV module of Keith & Koep (http://www.keith-koep.com). Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- MAINTAINERS |4 MAKEALL |1 + Makefile|7 ++- board/trizepsiv/conxs.c | 22 +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: add support for the polaris board

2009-06-30 Thread Stefano Babic
Ben Warren wrote: > This doesn't really mean that there are multiple Ethernet controllers. > It just means that U-boot should use the framework that supports > multiple interfaces. Most drivers only support one framework or the > other (MULTI or !MULTI), but in a couple of releases !MULTI will b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 u-boot-next] ARM: Don't include libgcc anymore

2009-06-30 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 13:59:14 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > This patch removes the inclusion of libgcc functions into U-Boot on the ARM > architecture. Only the really needed functions are provided in the lib_arm > directory. Those implementations are copied from Linux where they a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 u-boot-next] Move libgcc inclusion from common Makefile to platform configs files

2009-06-30 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 13:59:13 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > This patch moves the libgcc Makefile inclusion from the toplevel Makefile > to the arch_config.mk files. This is in preparation for the ARM > architecture to move away from including libgcc function and only using > self-c

Re: [U-Boot] Undefined reference to'flash_sect_protect' in env_flash.c

2009-06-30 Thread Johnson Yu
Hi Detlev, > Hi, > > >> I met this compiling error, any idea? >> >> /common/env_flash.c:312: undefined reference to `flash_sect_protect' >> /common/env_flash.c:316: undefined reference to `flash_sect_erase' >> /common/env_flash.c:329: undefined reference to `flash_sect_protect' >> make: *** [