[U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: fix USB initialization for Trizepsiv module

2009-07-01 Thread Stefano Babic
Due to change in the usb_board_init() prototype, the USB for the TrizepsIV was not correctly initialized. Removed dummy print from usb_board_stop(). Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- board/trizepsiv/conxs.c |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: add support for the polaris board

2009-07-01 Thread Stefano Babic
The Polaris board is based on the TrizepsIV module of Keith Koep (http://www.keith-koep.com). Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- MAINTAINERS |5 + MAKEALL |2 ++ Makefile|7 ++- board/trizepsiv/conxs.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed PPC4xx debug compilation error in uic.c

2009-07-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 05:40:53 Alessio Centazzo wrote: This patch fixes a debug compilation error for PPC4xx platforms, all other architectures are not affected by this change. The 'handler' pointer was undefined. The fix is exercised and has effect only if DEBUG is defined.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed compilation warning in 4xx_enet.c

2009-07-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 05:43:53 Alessio Centazzo wrote: This patch fixes a compilation warning for some Ethernet PHY-less PPC4xx platforms (440SPE based ones) and a potential compilation error for 440SP platforms (use of undefined 'ethgroup' variable). In the original code and in case of

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 4xx: Fix compilation warnings and MQ registers dump in SPD DDR2 code

2009-07-01 Thread Felix Radensky
This patch fixes printf format string compilation warnings in several debug statements. It also fixes the dump of DDR controller MQ registers found on some 44x and 46x platforms. The current register dump code uses incorrect DCRs to access these registers. Signed-off-by: Felix Radensky

[U-Boot] ppc-4xx timer application problem

2009-07-01 Thread prathika
hi all, I am working on PPC440EP based board.I have ported u-boot on the board. I was able to fix the problem of extracting data from the flash and executing it. Now I want to run a timer based application on u-boot. I am expecting periodical interrupts based on my configured value. I have

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Added support for splash screen positioning adding by adding

2009-07-01 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Dear Matthias, Thanks for this patch, some comments however. Please use short patch subject, e.g. [PATCH] Add support for splash screen positioning is enough. And than please add more descriptive patch commit message above your Signed-off-by line. In this commit message you can shortly explain

[U-Boot] JFFS2

2009-07-01 Thread Renaud barbier
U-boot based on v2009.06 I am seeing duplicated file on my JFFS2 partition as seen per u-boot after doing some operations on the partition from Linux. FRom U-boot I can get for instance: lrwxr-xr-x 30 Thu May 28 11:16:50 2009 dtb.old - orginalfile lrwxrwxrwx8 Mon May 11 09:00:49

[U-Boot] [PATCHv2 1/3] A320: driver for FTMAC100 ethernet controller

2009-07-01 Thread Po-Yu Chuang
This patch adds an FTMAC100 ethernet driver for Faraday A320 evaluation board. Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang ratb...@faraday-tech.com --- drivers/net/Makefile |1 + drivers/net/ftmac100.c | 268 drivers/net/ftmac100.h | 154

[U-Boot] [PATCHv2 2/3] A320: driver for FTRTC010 real time clock

2009-07-01 Thread Po-Yu Chuang
This patch adds an FTRTC010 driver for Faraday A320 evaluation board. Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang ratb...@faraday-tech.com --- drivers/rtc/Makefile |1 + drivers/rtc/ftrtc010.c | 126 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

[U-Boot] [PATCHv2 3/3] A320: Add support for Faraday A320 evaluation board

2009-07-01 Thread Po-Yu Chuang
This patch adds support for A320 development board from Faraday. This board uses FA526 processor by default and has 512kB and 32MB NOR flash, 64M RAM. FA526 is an ARMv4 processor and uses the ARM920T source in this patch. Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang ratb...@faraday-tech.com --- MAINTAINERS

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Macronix additional chips supported

2009-07-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
new chips supported:- MX25L1605D, MX25L3205D, MX25L6405D, MX25L12855E out of which MX25L6405D and MX25L12855E tested on Kirkwood platforms Modified the Macronix flash support to use 2 bytes of device id instead of 1 This was required to support MX25L12855E Contributor: Piyush Shah

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] Poseidon Board Support

2009-07-01 Thread Vivek
Hi I have added support for Samsung Poseidon GP Board(OMAP 2430) in U-Boot. [U-Boot][PATCH 1/6] Generic FileName -- Changed name of file omap2420.h to omap24xx.h in include/asm-arm/arch-omap24xx/.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] Generic FileName

2009-07-01 Thread Vivek
Changed name of file omap2420.h to omap24xx.h in include/asm-arm/arch-omap24xx/. Changed the files which are affected by this name change. These files are Apollon board and OMAP2420h4 specific. Signed-off-by: Vivek Dalal v.da...@samsung.com --- board/apollon/apollon.c |2

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] Generic MacroNames and OMAP2430 Definitions

2009-07-01 Thread Vivek
Made the include/asm-arm/arch-omap24xx/ generic file rather then specific to omap2420. So as to make it for family of processor of type omap24xx; Changed macros ending with OMAP2420 to OMAP24XX. Put the omap2420 specific code in CONFIG_OMAP242X macro and Poseidon Board support in CONFIG_OMAP243X

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] Poseidon Board Support

2009-07-01 Thread Vivek
Added board/poseidon directory and poseidon board specific files in it. Signed-off-by: Vivek Dalal v.da...@samsung.com --- board/poseidon/Makefile| 48 board/poseidon/config.mk | 20 + board/poseidon/load.S | 14 + board/poseidon/lowlevel_init.S | 197

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] Poseidon Board Support

2009-07-01 Thread Vivek
Added include/configs/poseidon.h file. Signed-off-by: Vivek Dalal v.da...@samsung.com --- include/configs/poseidon.h | 293 + 1 file changed, 293 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/configs/poseidon.h b/include/configs/poseidon.h index

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-01 Thread Richard Stallman
Not to go down a rat hole - but as a normal part of development of non-free software, people use emacs, gcc, and gdb all the time - you aren't proud of the contributions you made to those projects? Yes, I am, but not because they help proprietary software. What I set out to change

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-01 Thread Richard Stallman
Aneesh Chopra was Virginia s Fourth Secretary of Technology, and has recently been sworn in as the Federal CTO. I doubt I could get an appointment with such a high-ranked public servant without help from a high-ranked public master (businessman). But we can try.

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-01 Thread Richard Stallman
I can't see how someone can deny access to the network, while still allowing anyone's software to be run on the device, without some sort of key system in the networking hardware - is that what you had in mind? This is aimed at cell phone networks: it recognizes they are allowed

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] Poseidon IPL Support

2009-07-01 Thread Vivek
Added onenand_ipl/board/poseidon directory and onenand IPL specific files for poseidon in it. Signed-off-by: Vivek Dalal v.da...@samsung.com --- onenand_ipl/board/poseidon/Makefile | 84 + onenand_ipl/board/poseidon/config.mk | 14

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] Poseidon Compilation

2009-07-01 Thread Vivek
Changed Makefile to configure and compile for Poseidon Board. Signed-off-by: Vivek Dalal v.da...@samsung.com --- Makefile |6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index a23fbf6..26463d6 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -3090,6 +3090,12 @@

[U-Boot] Support for Calao USB A9263 board based on AT91SAM9263 CPU

2009-07-01 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hello, Here is a patch that adds the support for the Calao USB A9263 board. This is my first board support contribution to U-Boot, so don't hesitate to comment and suggest improvements. Thanks, Thomas --- Support for the Calao USB A9263 board The Calao USB A9263 board is a board manufactured

[U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Darius Augulis
Hi, I need to control RGMII PHY connected to GPIO. Seems there isn't such driver in u-boot. I would like to discuss how is better to implement this? I could port mdio_gpio driver from Linux Kernel, but u-boot does not have universal gpio driver. Off course I could make this very board specific,

Re: [U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Darius Augulis wrote: Hi, I need to control RGMII PHY connected to GPIO. Seems there isn't such driver in u-boot. I would like to discuss how is better to implement this? I could port mdio_gpio driver from Linux Kernel, but u-boot does not have universal gpio driver. Off course I could

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-01 Thread Graeme Russ
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Richard Stallmanr...@gnu.org wrote: I can't see how someone can deny access to the network, while still allowing anyone's software to be run on the device, without some sort of key system in the networking hardware - is that what you had in mind?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add suport for the graphic controller included in the JADE SOC

2009-07-01 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Dear Matthias, Thanks for this patch! Please see some comments/issues below which we should resolve before committing the driver. Matthias Weisser wrote: Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser matthias.weis...@graf-syteco.de --- drivers/video/jadegdc.c | 205

Re: [U-Boot] warnings from gcc-4.4 build

2009-07-01 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Kumar, When building the MPC8572DS_config w/gcc-4.4 I get: sys_eeprom.c: In function ‘do_mac’: sys_eeprom.c:323: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules sys_eeprom.c: In function ‘mac_read_from_eeprom’: sys_eeprom.c:395: warning: dereferencing

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-01 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Graeme Russ wrote: On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Richard Stallmanr...@gnu.org wrote: I can't see how someone can deny access to the network, while still allowing anyone's software to be run on the device, without some sort of key system in the networking hardware - is that what

[U-Boot] OpenRD base/client support?

2009-07-01 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Hi! I'm working on a OpenRD base board which is currently shipped with an old U-boot source archive (1.1.4). I understand that Marvell support for more boards are in the pipe, so I just wanted to ask if the work on the OpenRD has started? It works pretty well with U-boot built for sheevaplug -

Re: [U-Boot] OpenRD base/client support?

2009-07-01 Thread Simon Kagstrom
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:03:25 +0200 Dieter Kiermaier dk-arm-li...@gmx.de wrote: It works pretty well with U-boot built for sheevaplug - my main problem now is that it hangs on miiphy_reset. I can confirm that. Have the same behaviour but haven't time to investigate further. Maybe we can

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-01 Thread Robin Getz
On Wed 1 Jul 2009 07:45, Richard Stallman pondered: Not to go down a rat hole - but as a normal part of development of non-free software, people use emacs, gcc, and gdb all the time - you aren't proud of the contributions you made to those projects? Yes, I am, but not because

Re: [U-Boot] OpenRD base/client support?

2009-07-01 Thread Dieter Kiermaier
Am Mittwoch 01 Juli 2009 16:19:45 schrieb Simon Kagstrom: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:03:25 +0200 Dieter Kiermaier dk-arm-li...@gmx.de wrote: It works pretty well with U-boot built for sheevaplug - my main problem now is that it hangs on miiphy_reset. I can confirm that. Have the same

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-01 Thread Robin Getz
On Wed 1 Jul 2009 07:46, Richard Stallman pondered: I can't see how someone can deny access to the network, while still allowing anyone's software to be run on the device, without some sort of key system in the networking hardware - is that what you had in mind? This is aimed

[U-Boot] Questions about mx31ads.h

2009-07-01 Thread Yong Yang
Hi, I am trying to understand the settings in mx31ads.h, but got some questions: 1. I didn't see where CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET is defined. 2. #define CONFIG_LOADADDR0x8080/* loadaddr env var */ Is this the address where env var are loaded to the RAM? Why pick this particular address

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Add memory barriers to kwgbe_send/recv

2009-07-01 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Add memory barriers to kwgbe_send/recv kwgbe_send/recv both have loops waiting for the hardware to set a bit. GCC 4.3.3 cleverly optimizes this to ... a while(1); loop. This patch introduces memory barriers to force re-loading of the transmit descriptor. mb() wasn't defined for arm, but perhaps

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] Poseidon Board Support (Vivek)

2009-07-01 Thread Tom
Is there a link to a product description for the poseidon board ? Are they available to the public ? A large part of your changes are reorganizing omap24xx support. Have you looked at how it is already done in omapzoom ? git://git.omapzoom.org/repo/uboot.git I believe omapzoom does it better.

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 0/3] Add optional dma transfers to mtest

2009-07-01 Thread Peter Tyser
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 12:21 -0500, Peter Tyser wrote: This series tries to add a DMA memory test to the mtest tests. The DMA test performs bursts to SDRAM which can be useful in stressing memory and can be difficult to produce reliably in certain circumstances (eg running with data caches

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 0/3] Add optional dma transfers to mtest

2009-07-01 Thread Ira Snyder
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:59:47AM -0500, Peter Tyser wrote: On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 12:21 -0500, Peter Tyser wrote: This series tries to add a DMA memory test to the mtest tests. The DMA test performs bursts to SDRAM which can be useful in stressing memory and can be difficult to produce

Re: [U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Darius Augulis
On 07/01/2009 03:37 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Darius Augulis wrote: Hi, I need to control RGMII PHY connected to GPIO. Seems there isn't such driver in u-boot. I would like to discuss how is better to implement this? I could port mdio_gpio driver from Linux Kernel, but u-boot does not

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Add memory barriers to kwgbe_send/recv

2009-07-01 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Simon, Add memory barriers to kwgbe_send/recv kwgbe_send/recv both have loops waiting for the hardware to set a bit. GCC 4.3.3 cleverly optimizes this to ... a while(1); loop. This patch introduces memory barriers to force re-loading of the transmit descriptor. mb() wasn't defined for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] Poseidon Board Support

2009-07-01 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 04:55:01PM +0530, Vivek wrote: +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND +#include linux/mtd/nand_legacy.h +extern struct nand_chip nand_dev_desc[CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE]; +#endif NACK, do not add anything new that uses legacy NAND. -Scott

Re: [U-Boot] OpenRD base/client support?

2009-07-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: Simon Kagstrom [mailto:simon.kagst...@netinsight.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 7:50 PM To: dk-arm-li...@gmx.de Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar Subject: Re: [U-Boot] OpenRD base/client support? On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:03:25 +0200 Dieter

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Add memory barriers to kwgbe_send/recv

2009-07-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Simon Kagstrom Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 8:46 PM To: U-Boot ML Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Add memory barriers to kwgbe_send/recv Add memory barriers to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Add memory barriers to kwgbe_send/recv

2009-07-01 Thread Scott Wood
Stefan Roese wrote: I know that we advertised the usage of the io accessor functions for quite some time now. But I'm not so sure here anymore. One disadvantage of this usage could be speed penalty by the usage of too many unnecessary barriers (included via the accessor functions on some

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Assigned a static SMI address to all UECs TBIPA address.

2009-07-01 Thread Richard Retanubun
From 092396fa161036fc9754296269c510e76910c756 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:31:05 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Assigned a static SMI address to all UECs TBIPA address. It is set to 0x1F by default and can be overwritten on the

[U-Boot] [PATCH] UEC FIXED PHY: Determine fixed-phy port using UEC interface name.

2009-07-01 Thread Richard Retanubun
From 003e7ab2bb1ee6bdc569dd24496809a766284615 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:30:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] UEC FIXED PHY: Determine fixed-phy port using UEC interface name. Fixed a misunderstanding in the original

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 83xx: UEC: Added support for bitBang MII driver access to PHYs

2009-07-01 Thread Richard Retanubun
From 3aa39a9788c020b2192f44132d310b22e7c866a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:00:41 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] 83xx: UEC: Added support for bitBang MII driver access to PHYs This patch enabled support for having PHYs on

Re: [U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Richard Retanubun
Darius Augulis wrote: On 07/01/2009 03:37 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Darius Augulis wrote: Hi, I need to control RGMII PHY connected to GPIO. Seems there isn't such driver in u-boot. I would like to discuss how is better to implement this? I could port mdio_gpio driver from Linux Kernel,

Re: [U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Darius Augulis
On 07/01/2009 09:12 PM, Richard Retanubun wrote: Darius Augulis wrote: On 07/01/2009 03:37 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Darius Augulis wrote: Hi, I need to control RGMII PHY connected to GPIO. Seems there isn't such driver in u-boot. I would like to discuss how is better to implement this?

Re: [U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Richard Retanubun
Darius Augulis wrote: [snip] No, my system is not MPC based. I'm working on new board and CPU (Gemini) support in u-boot. My SoC has two GMAC controllers. btw, what is the right way to add new Ethernet driver? Should I define CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_NET_MULTI in my board config? Or should

Re: [U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Darius Augulis
On 07/01/2009 09:43 PM, Richard Retanubun wrote: Darius Augulis wrote: [snip] No, my system is not MPC based. I'm working on new board and CPU (Gemini) support in u-boot. My SoC has two GMAC controllers. btw, what is the right way to add new Ethernet driver? Should I define CONFIG_CMD_NET

Re: [U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Darius, Darius Augulis wrote: On 07/01/2009 09:12 PM, Richard Retanubun wrote: Darius Augulis wrote: On 07/01/2009 03:37 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Darius Augulis wrote: Hi, I need to control RGMII PHY connected to GPIO. Seems there isn't such driver in

[U-Boot] Dentists Contact List in the United States

2009-07-01 Thread Weston Madison
2009 Edition List of Dentists in America -- 164,842 |entists with City, State, Zip -- 158,676 Physical Addresses -- 163,577 Tel Nos -- 77,980 Facsimile Numbers -- 45,189 Emails Only until Jul 3 the special introductory price is $295 (reduced from $399) Write an email to

Re: [U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Darius Augulis
Hi Ben, On 07/01/2009 10:02 PM, Ben Warren wrote: Hi Darius, Darius Augulis wrote: On 07/01/2009 09:12 PM, Richard Retanubun wrote: Darius Augulis wrote: On 07/01/2009 03:37 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Darius Augulis wrote: Hi, I need to control RGMII PHY connected to GPIO. Seems there

Re: [U-Boot] net: gpio PHY driver

2009-07-01 Thread Scott Wood
Ben Warren wrote: It sure would be nice to see a patch that gets the CPU-specific crap out of the miiphybb driver. This type of problem has been dealt with in other places such as I2C and SPI. Any takers? There's a version of this driver in Linux which has been more abstracted (and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 83xx: UEC: Added support for bitBang MII driver access to PHYs

2009-07-01 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Richard, -#if !(defined(CONFIG_EP8248) || defined(CONFIG_EP82XXM)) - volatile ioport_t *iop = ioport_addr ((immap_t *) CONFIG_SYS_IMMR, MDIO_PORT); +#if !(defined(CONFIG_EP8248) || defined(CONFIG_EP82XXM)) \ + !defined(CONFIG_MPC83XX) + volatile gpio_n_t *iop = ioport_addr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: add support for the polaris board

2009-07-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 08:34 Wed 01 Jul , Stefano Babic wrote: The Polaris board is based on the TrizepsIV module of Keith Koep (http://www.keith-koep.com). Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- MAINTAINERS |5 + MAKEALL |2 ++ Makefile

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xscale: fix USB initialization for Trizepsiv module

2009-07-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 08:33 Wed 01 Jul , Stefano Babic wrote: Due to change in the usb_board_init() prototype, the USB for the TrizepsIV was not correctly initialized. Removed dummy print from usb_board_stop(). Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- board/trizepsiv/conxs.c |5 +++-- 1

[U-Boot] OMAP I2C Pending patches

2009-07-01 Thread Tom
I have set up a git repo to hold the i2c, twl4030 patchset. Also thrown in is a compiler warning fix. git clone http://dev.omapzoom.org/pub/scm/trix/u-boot.git git checkout -b t-pending origin/arm-next-pending This will make it easier test them and I have other twl4030 work that depends on

[U-Boot] [PATCH] PalmTC support

2009-07-01 Thread Marek Vasut
Hi, I'd like to get this patch in. It adds support for Palm Tungsten|C (a pxa255 based handheld device). The patch is available here (it's not all that hacky anymore): http://marex.hackndev.com/uboot/0001-Hacky-PalmTC-support-for-uboot.patch Thanks in advance Marek Vasut

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv2 3/3] A320: Add support for Faraday A320 evaluation board

2009-07-01 Thread Po-Yu Chuang
Hello, 2009/7/1 Po-Yu Chuang ratbert.chu...@gmail.com: diff --git a/include/configs/a320.h b/include/configs/a320.h +/*--- + * Ethernet + */ +#define CONFIG_NET_MULTI +#define CONFIG_DRIVER_FTMAC100 +#define

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/12] 85xx, 86xx: Break out DMA code to a common file

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: DMA support is now enabled via the CONFIG_FSL_DMA define instead of the previous CONFIG_DDR_ECC Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c| 47 --- cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c| 55

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 03/12] fsl_dma: Use proper I/O access functions

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c | 32 ++-- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) applied - k ___ U-Boot mailing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 02/12] fsl_dma: Add bitfield definitions for common registers

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c | 12 +- include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h | 46 + 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) applied - k

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 04/12] fsl_dma: Add support for arbitrarily large transfers

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Support DMA transfers larger than the DMA controller's limit of (2 ^ 26 - 1) bytes Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- drivers/dma/fsl_dma.c | 40 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 05/12] fsl_dma: Fix Channel Start bug in dma_check()

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: The Channel Start (CS) bit in the Mode Register (MR) should actually be cleared as the comment in the code suggests. Previously, CS was being set, not cleared. Assuming normal operation of the DMA engine, this change shouldn't have any

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/12] 8xxx: Rename dma_xfer() to dmacpy()

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Also update dmacpy()'s argument order to match memcpy's and use phys_addr_t/phy_size_t for address/size arguments Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- board/mpc8540eval/mpc8540eval.c | 25 -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/12] 83xx: Replace CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRC references

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Update 83xx architecture's CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRC references to CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRCONTROLLER, which other Freescale architectures use Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- board/freescale/mpc8360emds/mpc8360emds.c |4

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/12] fsl_dma: Move dma function prototypes to common header file

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen1.c|4 include/asm-ppc/fsl_dma.h |5 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) applied - k ___

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 08/12] 85xx, 86xx: Move dma_init() call to common code

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- board/mpc8540eval/mpc8540eval.c |2 +- board/sbc8560/sbc8560.c |2 +- cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c |4 +++- cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen1.c |2 --

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/12] fsl_dma: Break out common memory initialization function

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- board/mpc8540eval/mpc8540eval.c | 32 +--- board/sbc8560/sbc8560.c | 32 +--- cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen1.c | 26

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/12] fsl_dma: Make DMA transactions snoopable

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Make DMA transactions snoopable so that CPUs can keep caches up-to- date. This allows dma transactions to be used for operations such as memory copies without any additional cache control operations. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser

[U-Boot] loading via jtag

2009-07-01 Thread E Robertson
Hi All, Has anyone used the JTAG like the BDI2000 to load u-boot onto a at91sam9263? I've done it on other boards but some some reason the code will not execute from on board SDRAM. To avoid initializing the external memory via jtag, I use the bootstrap code to do the setup then load u-boot and

[U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl_ddr: Fix DDR3 calculation of rank density with 8GB or more

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
From: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com The calculate for rank density in compute_ranksize() for DDR3 used all integers for the expression, so the result was also a 32-bit integer, even though the 'bsize' variable is a u64. Fix the expression to calculate a true 64-bit value. Signed-off-by: Timur

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] XPedite5170 board support

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: Initial support for Extreme Engineering Solutions XPedite5170 - a MPC8640-based 3U VPX single board computer with a PMC/XMC site. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com --- changes since v1: - Removed enabling of FSL DMA driver and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl_ddr: Fix DDR3 calculation of rank density with 8GB or more

2009-07-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 1, 2009, at 11:20 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: From: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com The calculate for rank density in compute_ranksize() for DDR3 used all integers for the expression, so the result was also a 32-bit integer, even though the 'bsize' variable is a u64. Fix the expression

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] P2020RDB Support Added

2009-07-01 Thread Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
The following patch series add P2020RDB platform support in u-boot. [PATCH 1/5] Adds GPIO registers to MPC85xx Memory Map. [PATCH 2/5] Second UART port added for MPC85xx, MPC83xx, MPC86xx processors [PATCH 3/5] Added support of Vitesse PHYs VSC8641(RGMII) and VSC8221(SGMII) [PATCH 4/5] Removed

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed PPC4xx debug compilation error in uic.c

2009-07-01 Thread Alessio Centazzo
This patch fixes a debug compilation error for PPC4xx platforms, all other architectures are not affected by this change. The 'handler' pointer was undefined. The fix is exercised and has effect only if DEBUG is defined. Signed-off-by: Alessio Centazzo acpa...@yahoo.com --- cpu/ppc4xx/uic.c |

[U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed compilation warning in 4xx_enet.c

2009-07-01 Thread Alessio Centazzo
This patch fixes a compilation warning for some Ethernet PHY-less PPC4xx platforms (440SPE based ones) and a potential compilation error for 440SP platforms (use of undefined 'ethgroup' variable). In the original code and in case of 440SPE platforms, 'ethgroup' is initialized to -1 and never