On 07/08/2009 02:30 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 15:14 Fri 03 Jul , Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
>> This patch adds support for A320 development board from Faraday. This board
>> uses FA526 processor by default and has 512kB and 32MB NOR flash, 64M RAM.
>> FA526 is an ARMv4 processor
Hi rhabarber1848,
thanx for your test, happy to read your issue is solved.
Now I hope this patch will be part of best so far u-boot tree.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On
Behalf Of rhabarber1848
Sent:
Hi, Wolfgang
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Felix Radensky,
>
> In message <4a75ece6.8090...@embedded-sol.com> you wrote:
>
>> I'm hitting the error below when compiling the latest git u-boot for
>> MPC8536DS target.
>> I'm using toolchain from Freescale BSP for this board. ld version is
>> 2.1
Hello Wolfgang
Thanks for your comments!,
Please find replies inline.
Regards
Poonam
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 11:45 PM
> To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] P2020
> + * Copyright (C) 2008,2009 Eric Jarrige
> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Ilya Yanok
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
> + *
On 00:06 Mon 03 Aug , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe,
>
> can you please update me on the status of the ARM repository, and
> provide some forecast when you will send a pull request?
normaly to night
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing
STx AMC8548 board is an old, AMC form factor, MPC8548 based board intended
for RapidIO applications. It features 16MiB NAND flash, one DDR2 soDIMM
slot, ethernet on front panel and backplane, RapidIO on backplane, USB
controller on local bus (not currently enabled) and no PCI of any kind.
Signed-
Hi Scott,
thanks for the review.
Scott Wood wrote:
>> +/* OOB placement block for use with hardware ecc generation */
>> +static struct nand_ecclayout nand_hw_eccoob = {
>> +.eccbytes = 5,
>> +.eccpos = {6, 7, 8, 9, 10},
>> +.oobfree = {{0, 5}, {11, 5}, }
>> +};
>> +
>> +#ifndef CONFI
This patch adds support for i.MX27-LITEKIT development board from
LogicPD. This board uses i.MX27 SoC and has 2MB NOR flash, 64MB NAND
flash, FEC ethernet controller integrated into i.MX27.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
---
MAINTAINERS |1 +
MAKEALL
Driver for NFC NAND controller found on Freescale's MX2 and MX3
processors. Ported from Linux. Tested only with i.MX27 but should
works with other MX2 and MX3 processors too.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
---
drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile |1 +
drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c | 902 ++
Dear Jean-Christophe,
can you please update me on the status of the ARM repository, and
provide some forecast when you will send a pull request?
The merge window was closed two weeks ago, and still I have not seen a
pull request for ARM!
Please understand this is becoming really urgent now.
If
Dear Felix Radensky,
In message <4a75ece6.8090...@embedded-sol.com> you wrote:
>
> I'm hitting the error below when compiling the latest git u-boot for
> MPC8536DS target.
> I'm using toolchain from Freescale BSP for this board. ld version is
> 2.18.50.20080215,
> gcc version is 4.3.2. Any ide
Hi,
I'm hitting the error below when compiling the latest git u-boot for
MPC8536DS target.
I'm using toolchain from Freescale BSP for this board. ld version is
2.18.50.20080215,
gcc version is 4.3.2. Any ideas how to fix this ?
UNDEF_SYM=`powerpc-none-linux-gnuspe-objdump -x
board/freescale/m
Hi all,
I want to inform you about a change in the configuration of the
mailing list software. I received complaints that multiple (up to 15)
digest e-mails were sent per day. This was most probably caused by
the fact that the default mailman settings had a digest size thresh-
hold of on
Dear Poonam Aggrwal,
In message <1249213937-19489-1-git-send-email-poonam.aggr...@freescale.com> you
wrote:
> The code base is generic to add more P1_P2 RDB platforms support as and when
> required.
> The folder and file names are such that they can cater to future SOCs of P1/P2
> family.
> P1 P2
Hello list and Kevin,
What about all these patches, did they apply with head?
I have a s3c2440 based board and will be happy to test them.
Thanks
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
The code base is generic to add more P1_P2 RDB platforms support as and when
required.
The folder and file names are such that they can cater to future SOCs of P1/P2
family.
P1 P2 processors are 85xx platforms which fall in Low End and Ultra Low End
band of Freescale QorIQ series.
Tested the foll
Dear Dirk Behme,
In message <4a753db9.6080...@googlemail.com> you wrote:
>
> > But libgcc.a fo ARM is obviously not perfect, and causes problems. So
> > Jean-Christophe suggested to use the alternative implementation he
> > wanted to copy from the Linux code - which again is supposed to allow
Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear "J.C. Wren",
>
> In message <17434f2e0908011243y666d2d40if6fdfd8a5c00c...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>> I thought the idea was to move u-boot away from libgcc dependencies. Or did
>> I misread that? I know that a previous problem I commented on was
19 matches
Mail list logo