Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 3/3] Add support for the LaCie ED Mini V2 board

2009-12-02 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Someone off the list made me notice the following: Albert Aribaud a écrit : > +++ b/board/LaCie/edminiv2/lowlevel_init.S > @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@ > +/*** > +Copyright (c) Albert ARIBAUD > +Redistributed under GPLv2, pursuant

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] makefiles: fixes for building build tools

2009-12-02 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Scott, On Wednesday 02 December 2009 22:59:03 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > config.mk | 34 - > > rules.mk| 13 - > > tools/Makefile | 121 > > +- > > tools/easylogo/Makefile |9 ++- > > tool

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] SPI: Fix 32 bit transfers in mxc_spi.c

2009-12-02 Thread Magnus Lilja
2009/12/3 Guennadi Liakhovetski : > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> Dear Guennadi, >> >> In message <1257965907-5622-1-git-send-email-lilja.mag...@gmail.com> Magnus >> Lilja wrote: >> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c b/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c >> > index fad9840..8b5d4be 100644 >> >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Removes dead code in the file common/cmd_i2c.c

2009-12-02 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > Dear Pratap Chandu, > > In message <1258034305-31770-1-git-send-email-pratap.r...@gmail.com> you > wrote: >> There is some dead code enclosed by #if 0 #endif in the file >> common/cmd_i2c.c >> This patch removes the dead code. >> >> Signed-off-by: P

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] POST: Remove duplicated post_hotkey_pressed() functions

2009-12-02 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch introduces a weak default function for post_hotkey_pressed(), returning 0, for boards without hotkey support. The long-running tests won't be started on those boards. This default function was implemented in many board directories. By implementing this weak default we can remove all thos

Re: [U-Boot] Regarding MPC8640D second core initialization

2009-12-02 Thread Thirumalai
> > On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:55 AM, Thirumalai wrote: > >> Thank you denx. >> >> Hi Jon, > > The email address you used for Jon is invalid (we need to update the > maintainers file - Jon should weigh in here). > >> >> I am using 2009-06 u-boot for MPC8640D based custom board. i just >> want to k

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4 v2] config_defaults.h: new header for common u-boot config defaults

2009-12-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
There are a bunch of features in U-Boot that we want to enable by default, and it's best if we centralize them in one place rather than updating all the board files out there. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger --- note: the LMB patch should be applied before this small series to avoid conflicts -- th

[U-Boot] [PATCH]Fix checksum to handle odd-length packet

2009-12-02 Thread Greg Ren
Hi all: I am new to u-boot and got assignment to debug some networking issue. I traced the checksum failure and was able to fix it with the patch below. This change fixes: 1. The checksum generation failure for odd-length packet. 2. Do not ignore the LSB of checksum value - (Again, I am new to th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx: Remove unused CONFIG_ASSUME_AMD_FLASH from config files

2009-12-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Becky Bruce, > > In message <1257381008-18020-1-git-send-email-bec...@kernel.crashing.org > > you wrote: >> A bunch of the 85xx boards have this cruft in them - it's not used >> anywhere. Delete it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce >> ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ppc: Added macro to test for specific SVR revision

2009-12-02 Thread Kumar Gala
Various SoC errata are specific to a given revision of silicon. This patch gives us a simple macro to use when doing such tests. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- * Removed extra whitespace per Wolfgang feedback * Fixed up commit message include/asm-ppc/processor.h |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH (repost)] samsung: fix DMC1_MEM_CFG for s3c64xx

2009-12-02 Thread Seunghyeon Rhee
Minkyu Kang worte: > Dear Seunghyeon Rhee, > > 2009/11/28 "Seunghyeon Rhee" : > >> The MSB of DMC1_MEM_CFG can be set to '1' for separate CKE control >> for S3C6400. In the configuration of SMDK6400, however, two 16-bit >> mDDR (SAMSUNG K4X51163) chips are used in parallel to form 32-bit >> memo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] SPI: Fix 32 bit transfers in mxc_spi.c

2009-12-02 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Guennadi, > > In message <1257965907-5622-1-git-send-email-lilja.mag...@gmail.com> Magnus > Lilja wrote: > > Commit f9b6a1575d9f1ca192e4cb60e547aa66f08baa3f, "i.MX31: fix SPI > > driver for shorter than 32 bit" broke 32 bit transfers. This patch >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Jon Loeliger is not maintaining any Freescale board.

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jon, In message you wrote: > > MAINTAINERS |9 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) Thanks a lot, but I will ignore this patch as Kumar "volunteered" to inherit this stuff. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Remove entirely superfluous preprocessor tests from some cmd_*.c files.

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Robert P. J. Day", In message you wrote: > > A small number of common/cmd_*.c files contain preprocessor tests that > are apparently superfluous since those same tests are used in the > Makefile to control the compilation of those files. Those tests are > clearly redundant as long as they

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc: Added macro to test for specific SVR revision

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message <1258642215-13948-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > Various SoC errata are specific to a given revision of silicon this > gives us a simple macro to use when doing such tests. You probably want to s/silicon this/silicon. This patch/ ? > Signed-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Joakim Tjernlund, In message <1258634656-21262-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> you wrote: > Ported over the more efficient linux crc32() function. > A quick comparsion on ppc: > After changing the old crc32 to do 4 bytes in the > inner loop to be able to compare with new vers

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Jon Loeliger is not maintaining any Freescale board.

2009-12-02 Thread Jon Loeliger
From: Jon Loeliger Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger --- Becky schrieb: > On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:55 AM, Thirumalai wrote: > > > Thank you denx. > > > > Hi Jon, > > The email address you used for Jon is invalid (we need to update the > maintainers file - Jon should weigh in here). MAINTAINERS |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] README: Update the list of directories.

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Robert P. J. Day", In message you wrote: > > Bring the directory listing more into line with current content. > > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day Applied, thanks. > not meant to be comprehensive, just to get things more up-to-date. > feel free to tweak as you see fit. > > diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Removes dead code in the file common/cmd_i2c.c

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Pratap Chandu, In message <1258034305-31770-1-git-send-email-pratap.r...@gmail.com> you wrote: > There is some dead code enclosed by #if 0 #endif in the file > common/cmd_i2c.c > This patch removes the dead code. > > Signed-off-by: Pratap Chandu > --- > common/cmd_i2c.c |8 --

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] smc91111_eeprom: drop CONFIG stub protection

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <1257979916-28354-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: > Since the Makefile now controls the compilation of this, there is no need > for CONFIG checking nor the stub function. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > --- > examples/standalone/smc9_eeprom

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] SPI: Fix 32 bit transfers in mxc_spi.c

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Guennadi, In message <1257965907-5622-1-git-send-email-lilja.mag...@gmail.com> Magnus Lilja wrote: > Commit f9b6a1575d9f1ca192e4cb60e547aa66f08baa3f, "i.MX31: fix SPI > driver for shorter than 32 bit" broke 32 bit transfers. This patch > makes single 32 bit transfer work again. > > Tested

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] RTC: Fix return code in MC13783 RTC driver.

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Magnus Lilja, In message <1257965818-11486-1-git-send-email-lilja.mag...@gmail.com> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja > --- > drivers/rtc/mc13783-rtc.c |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Eng

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] cmd_date: Fix spelling in error message.

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Magnus Lilja, In message <1257965796-5032-1-git-send-email-lilja.mag...@gmail.com> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja > --- > common/cmd_date.c |6 +++--- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineer

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Move do_irqinfo() to common/cmd_irq.c

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1257957388-17595-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote: > cmd_irq.c is a much better home and it is already conditionally > compiled based on CONFIG_CMD_IRQ. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser > --- > common/cmd_irq.c |9 + > common/cmd_misc.c |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_license: Remove unneeded #ifdef CONFIG_CMD_LICENSE

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1257957379-17557-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote: > cmd_license is already conditionally compiled at the Makefile-level. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser > --- > common/cmd_license.c |4 > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Appl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] m41t11: Remove unused functions

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1257801532-20090-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser > --- > drivers/rtc/m41t11.c | 14 -- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software E

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] circbuf: Move to lib_generic and conditionally compile

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1257801470-19987-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote: > circbuf could be used as a generic library and is only currently > needed when CONFIG_USB_TTY is defined. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser > --- > common/Makefile |1 - > lib_gen

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Fix build failure in examples/standalone

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Sanjeev Premi, In message <1257786780-9618-1-git-send-email-pr...@ti.com> you wrote: > Some versions of 'make' do not handle trailing white-spaces > properly. Trailing spaces in ELF causes a 'fake' source to > be added to the variable COBJS; leading to build failure > (listed below). The prob

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ARM Add New Board GEC2410 rev2

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Hui.Tang", In message <1257476600-13264-1-git-send-email-zetal...@gmail.com> you wrote: ... > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile ... > +gec2410_config : unconfig > + @mkdir -p $(obj)include $(obj)board/gec/gec2410 > + @mkdir -p $(obj)nand_spl/board/gec/gec2410 > + @echo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] lmb: only force on arches that use it

2009-12-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 16:49:37 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > sorry Scott, didnt mean to direct this to you. meant to send the nand > > one only to you. > > So what is supposed to happen with this patch? Do we consider this a > fix for the upcoming release? Or is it for

Re: [U-Boot] Clean-up of s3c24x0 header files

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hi Kevin, looking at the code resulting from commit 9ebfdc20 again, I see that you keep a LOT of uppercase variable names, which are not allowed as per coding style. DO you intend to convert these to proper lower-case names any time soon? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineer

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] makefiles: fixes for building build tools

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott Wood, In message <20091105004141.gb...@loki.buserror.net> you wrote: > Currently, some of the tools instead set CC to be HOSTCC in order to re-use > some pattern rules -- but this fails when the user overrides CC on the make > command line. Also, the HOSTCFLAGS in tools/Makefile are cu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx: Remove unused CONFIG_ASSUME_AMD_FLASH from config files

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Becky Bruce, In message <1257381008-18020-1-git-send-email-bec...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > A bunch of the 85xx boards have this cruft in them - it's not used > anywhere. Delete it. > > Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce > --- > include/configs/MPC8536DS.h |7 --- > include/conf

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] config_defaults.h: new header for common u-boot config defaults

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <1257371196-11360-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: > There are a bunch of features in U-Boot that we want to enable by default, > and it's best if we centralize them in one place rather than updating all > the board files out there. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] exports: rewrite jump table init

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <1257370482-9287-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: > The current jump table init fails to initialize a bunch of exported > symbols (forceenv/do_reset/etc...). Rather than fix just these few > missing pieces, rewrite the code to utilize the existing lis

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Improve read performance of generic mmc.

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Andy, In message <12573045662644-git-send-email-r65...@freescale.com> Terry Lv wrote: > In drivers/mmc/mmc.c, mmc_bread will do aligned read. > So we don't need to use single block read. > We can use multiblock read to improve the performance. > > Signed-off-by: Terry Lv > --- > drivers/mm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] lmb: only force on arches that use it

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <200911031139.41356.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: > > sorry Scott, didnt mean to direct this to you. meant to send the nand one > only to you. So what is supposed to happen with this patch? Do we consider this a fix for the upcoming release? Or is it for "next"? O

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add block write function to spartan3 slave serial load

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Wolfgang Wegner, In message <1256918102-3760-1-git-send-email-w.weg...@astro-kom.de> you wrote: > Using seperate function calls for each bit-bang of slave serial > load can be painfully slow. This patch adds the possibility to > supply a block write function that loads the complete block of >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] add ability to handle compressed images to imxtract

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Wolfgang Wegner, In message <1256916625-30792-1-git-send-email-w.weg...@astro-kom.de> you wrote: > imxtract currently can not handle compressed images. This patch adds > handling for bzip2 and zip compression. In both cases, a destination > address has to be specified for extraction. > > Sig

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] POST: Remove duplicated post_hotkey_pressed() functions

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message <1256906335-6477-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote: > This patch introduces a weak default function for post_hotkey_pressed(), > returning 0, for boards without hotkey support. The long-running tests > won't be started on those boards. This default function was i

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update responsible for MPC85xx/86xx

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Kumar Gala Cc: Becky Bruce --- MAINTAINERS |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index d70a9d2..59599b8 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ Nye Liu ZUMA

Re: [U-Boot] Problem with U-Boot with running in RAM

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Lasse Skov, In message <4f4169b21905494ebd47a304f02192c92772357...@xch-hq-01.kk.local> you wrote: > > The problem is that the U-Boot has a problem when it try to rellocate itself > to RAM. > I know that this could be some timing settings for the SDRAM and the RAM > controller. Not only t

Re: [U-Boot] Regarding MPC8640D second core initialization

2009-12-02 Thread Becky Bruce
On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:55 AM, Thirumalai wrote: > Thank you denx. > > Hi Jon, The email address you used for Jon is invalid (we need to update the maintainers file - Jon should weigh in here). > > I am using 2009-06 u-boot for MPC8640D based custom board. i just > want to know whether the

[U-Boot] Problem with U-Boot with running in RAM

2009-12-02 Thread Lasse Skov
Hi I have a problem with running the U-Boot on my own board. The target porcesser is a MPC8377E with DDR2 ram. The problem is that the U-Boot has a problem when it try to rellocate itself to RAM. I know that this could be some timing settings for the SDRAM and the RAM controller. But the thing

Re: [U-Boot] SD card support for U-boot 1.3.4

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jimmy Shergill, In message you wrote: > > Thanks for your reply. As suggested, I have downloaded version 2009.08 and > built it like this (please tell me if thats correct) > > # make at91sam9263ek_config > ... with environment variable in SPI DATAFLASH CS0 > Configuring for at91sam9263ek b

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot Arm1026ejs support

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear pawan, In message <64a762f50912020305o4b377b1awc8ade988944ea...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > I'm referring to u-boot-1.1.4 codebase. The "cpu" support for the arm1026ejs > is not visible in the source code. Is this support available in the form of > any patch or in general how can I add th

Re: [U-Boot] Looking for lists?

2009-12-02 Thread leftover Flynn
Dear Kerry RE: Your request for information about our contact lists The following are a few of the popular lists we have for the USA: Physicians (34 specialties) - 788k records, 17k emails, 200k fax numbers Chiropractors - 108,421 total records * 3,414 emails * 6,553 fax numbers Alternative M

Re: [U-Boot] Breakage on arm/next

2009-12-02 Thread Scott Wood
apgmoorthy wrote: > I felt moving these macros "include/linux/mtd/onenand.h" will be ideal in this > scenario. Are they going to be the same on all boards? We let the board determine the environment location for other types of storage. How about just using CONFIG_ENV_ADDR/CONFIG_ENV_SIZE? On b

Re: [U-Boot] SD card support for U-boot 1.3.4

2009-12-02 Thread Jimmy Shergill
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jimmy Shergill, > > In message > you wrote: > > > > I am a new user of U-boot and Linux. Please bear with me. I have Atmel > > AT91SAM9263-EK (ARM based) and have U-boot 1.3.4 running on it. Currently > > U-boot, Linux Kernel and jffs2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TWL4030: make LEDs selectable in twl4030_led_init()

2009-12-02 Thread Grazvydas Ignotas
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Tom wrote: > Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: >> >> diff --git a/drivers/misc/twl4030_led.c b/drivers/misc/twl4030_led.c >> index bfdafef..d2cc3c8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/misc/twl4030_led.c >> +++ b/drivers/misc/twl4030_led.c >> @@ -39,12 +39,15 @@ >>  #define LEDAPWM  

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TWL4030: make LEDs selectable in twl4030_led_init()

2009-12-02 Thread Tom
Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > Not all boards have both LEDs hooked, so enabling both on > boards with single LED will just waste power. Make it > possible to choose LEDs by adding argument to > twl4030_led_init(). > > Using this turn on only LEDB for pandora, leave both LEDs > on for all other boards

[U-Boot] [PATCH] TWL4030: make LEDs selectable in twl4030_led_init()

2009-12-02 Thread Grazvydas Ignotas
Not all boards have both LEDs hooked, so enabling both on boards with single LED will just waste power. Make it possible to choose LEDs by adding argument to twl4030_led_init(). Using this turn on only LEDB for pandora, leave both LEDs on for all other boards, as it was before this patch. Signed-

[U-Boot] MPC8640D second core initialization

2009-12-02 Thread Thirumalai
Hi Kumar, I am using 2009-06 u-boot for MPC8640D based custom board. I just want to know whether the second core of MPC8640D is kicked off automatically or will it required by the user to kick[like mpc85xx/mp.c]. Also if am enabling the CONFIG_MP macro and CONFIG_NUM_CPUS as 2, then t

Re: [U-Boot] Breakage on arm/next

2009-12-02 Thread apgmoorthy
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: rub...@gnudd.com [mailto:rub...@gnudd.com] On Behalf Of > Alessandro Rubini > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 9:36 PM > To: tom@windriver.com > Cc: moorthy@samsung.com; scottw...@freescale.com; > u-boot@lists.denx.de; kyungmin.p...@samsung.com

[U-Boot] U-boot Arm1026ejs support

2009-12-02 Thread pawan
Hi, I'm referring to u-boot-1.1.4 codebase. The "cpu" support for the arm1026ejs is not visible in the source code. Is this support available in the form of any patch or in general how can I add this support? Please help. Thank You, Pawan ___ U-Boot mail

Re: [U-Boot] Mixed 8/16 bits NOR FLASH support

2009-12-02 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Stefan Roese, >> I have to admit, that I'm not totally sure about this problem. Perhaps it >> would be best, if you would try to "fix" to the CFI code. To verify, if your >> theory is correct. And then post the resulting fix to the list, so that we >> can >> dis

Re: [U-Boot] Mixed 8/16 bits NOR FLASH support

2009-12-02 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Stefan Roese a écrit : > Hi Albert, >> In the case of U-boot's CFI detection code, it detects the MX29LV400CB >> as 16-bit because of its QRY block offset (0x20) and null upper bytes. >> Then it wants to talk to it using 16-bit wide writes at 16-bit mode >> offsets, which, in my case, fails. > >

Re: [U-Boot] Regarding MPC8640D second core initialization

2009-12-02 Thread Thirumalai
Thank you denx. Hi Jon, I am using 2009-06 u-boot for MPC8640D based custom board. i just want to know whether the second core of MPC8640D is kicked off automatically or will it required by the user to kick using cpu command like mpc85xx/mp.c. Also if am enabling the CONFIG_MP macro

[U-Boot] Regarding MPC8640D second core initialization

2009-12-02 Thread Thirumalai
Hi denx, I am using 2009-06 u-boot for MPC8640D based board. i just want to know whether the second core of MPC8640D is kicked off automatically or will it required by the user to kick. Also if am enabling the CONFIG_MP macro and CONFIG_NUM_CPUS as 2, then the reset command of the target

Re: [U-Boot] Regarding MPC8640D second core initialization

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Thirumalai", In message <37ef3a462afe4b5090e87f6b7f3f3...@itd210> you wrote: > Hi denx, > I am using 2009-06 u-boot for MPC8640D based board. i just want to > know whether the second core of MPC8640D is kicked off automatically or will > it required by the user to kick. Also if am

Re: [U-Boot] Mixed 8/16 bits NOR FLASH support (was: [PATCH V2 3/3] Add support for the LaCie ED Mini V2 board)

2009-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message <200912021015.34183...@denx.de> you wrote: > > Maybe. I don't remember ever using an mixed-mode chip (8 & 16bit interface) > in > 8bit mode. Indeed. I wonder which arguments the hardware designer has to defend such an implementation. > I have to admit, that I'm n

Re: [U-Boot] Mixed 8/16 bits NOR FLASH support (was: [PATCH V2 3/3] Add support for the LaCie ED Mini V2 board)

2009-12-02 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Albert, On Wednesday 02 December 2009 09:31:43 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> This board is based on the Marvell Orion5x SoC. > >> Current support is limited to console and Flash. > >> Flash support uses LEGACY as the Macronix 29LV400 > >> used on ED Mini V2 is not 100% CFI compliant. > > > > And t

[U-Boot] Mixed 8/16 bits NOR FLASH support (was: [PATCH V2 3/3] Add support for the LaCie ED Mini V2 board)

2009-12-02 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
(starting a new subject as this goes beyond simply adding support for any platform/SoC/whetever, and touches on MTD/Flash, thus also adding Stefan as To:) Hi Wolfgang and others, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Albert Aribaud, > > In message <1258239796-21528-4-git-send-email-albert.arib...@fre