Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit a1b322a98319de568b3bc38029ef7e123643c1e8:
Ladislav Michl (1):
ns16550: kick watchdog while waiting for a character
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-net.git master
Siddarth Gore (1):
NET: kirkwood-
Stefan,
On 2/2/2010 4:43 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> This patch fixes a problem I've notived on a buggy PPC4xx system. This
> system has problems with the PHY MDIO communication and seemed to be
> stuck/crashed in miiphy_reset(). But degugging revealed, that the CPU
> didn't crash, but "only" hung i
Stefano,
On 2/1/2010 5:51 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> The patch add support for the Freescale mx51 processor
> to the FEC ethernet driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
> ---
> drivers/net/fec_mxc.c | 73
> +---
> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+
Siddarth,
On 1/18/2010 9:39 PM, Siddarth Gore wrote:
> Although the datasheet mentions seperate smi registers for each
> port, using Port 1 smi register to access ethernet phys does not
> work. Hence only Port 0 smi register should be used to access all
> devices connected to the smi bus. This beh
Dirk,
On 2/5/2010 11:30 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 24.01.2010 01:05, Tom wrote:
>
>> Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote:
>>
>>>From 9bb1c3501c8f098dac6e224c99e409ebf92b0ab9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Syed Mohammed Khasim
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:11:14 +0530
>>> Subject: [PATCH]
Setting ASA bit hurts performance for the code which has lots of I-cache
misses and there are no Cortex-A8 errata workarounds which would require
to have it.
A test program which intentionally stresses I-cache misses on conditional
branches is attached.
ASA bit is not set:
real0m2.940s
user
725233: PLD instructions executed with PLD data forwarding
enabled can result in a processor deadlock
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka
---
cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/board.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/board.c b/cpu/arm_cortexa
Hi Alessandro,
El Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:54:05PM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> printf goes to uart1, but it will block forever waiting for
> busy to go off unless the uart is enabled first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini
> ---
> board/edb93xx/edb93xx.c |6 ++
> 1 files chang
El Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:53:54PM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> Previous code compiled with gcc-4.2.2 makes a call to
> __aeabi_uidiv to divide by 20. As a side effect it was
> not inline any more, and so sdram_cfg used the stack
> as well, but this is early code that has no stack yet.
> The
El Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:53:43PM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> The structure was missing a reserved entry (not listed in the manual,
> actually), so the last registers had a wrong offset. This prevented
> all swlocked registers to be modified as swlock is last in the structure.
>
> Signed-o
Hi Alessandro,
El Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:53:30PM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> I'm porting current u-boot to a board similar to EP9315A, so I'm using
> arm/master as a basis, as it includes the patches by Matthias
> Kaehlcke. I'm currently running from RAM (SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT), after
> sett
printf goes to uart1, but it will block forever waiting for
busy to go off unless the uart is enabled first.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini
---
board/edb93xx/edb93xx.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/edb93xx/edb93xx.c b/board/edb93xx/edb93xx.
Previous code compiled with gcc-4.2.2 makes a call to
__aeabi_uidiv to divide by 20. As a side effect it was
not inline any more, and so sdram_cfg used the stack
as well, but this is early code that has no stack yet.
The patch explicitly removes the division, so no stack is used.
The calculation o
The structure was missing a reserved entry (not listed in the manual,
actually), so the last registers had a wrong offset. This prevented
all swlocked registers to be modified as swlock is last in the structure.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini
---
include/asm-arm/arch-ep93xx/ep93xx.h |3 ++-
I'm porting current u-boot to a board similar to EP9315A, so I'm using
arm/master as a basis, as it includes the patches by Matthias
Kaehlcke. I'm currently running from RAM (SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT), after
setting up sdram and pll elsewhere (older vendor u-boot code, still to
be ported).
"fix syscon_
Dear Tom,
In message <4b6d9a3d.5090...@windriver.com> you wrote:
>
> > It was done automatically using Lindent but I had to do some manual
> > tidying up because Lindent doesn't always get things right.
>
> Maybe a good way to spit the patch is
> 1. Lindent
> 2. Manual
> So reviewer could spend m
Dear Fabio Giovagnini,
please read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html - don't
top post / full quote, please.
In message <201002061654.11412.fabio.giovagn...@aurion-tech.com> you wrote:
>
> for sure my borad is not an rsk 7203, being my board designed by me; but I
> followed the rsk
Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
In message <4b6d8128.5000...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
>
> > I think this should be merged into a single patch.
>
> OK. It'll be about 140K though so I'llput it on a web site.
Just post it. I will check and eventually ACK it.
> OK, it's q
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2010 16:35, Tom wrote:
>> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/02/2010 15:14, Tom wrote:
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang
>
> On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to link u-boot putting the code into my nor flash; the variables into
on chip (sh2a 7203) ram; where do need to put got section, u_boot_cmd ? In
ram or in flash?
Sorry but I'm new of u-boot and os based boards.
Best regards
--
Fabio Giovagnini
Aurion s.r.l.
CF e P.IVA 0088
On 06/02/2010 16:35, Tom wrote:
> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/02/2010 15:14, Tom wrote:
>>> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
Hi Wolfgang
On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
>
>
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2010 15:14, Tom wrote:
>> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>>> Hi Wolfgang
>>>
>>> On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
In message<4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-s
On 06/02/2010 15:14, Tom wrote:
> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang
>>
>> On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
>>>
>>> In message<4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
The patches are split so t
Dear Wolfgang,
for sure my borad is not an rsk 7203, being my board designed by me; but I
followed the rsk 7203 schematics to connect NOR Flash, SDRAM, ETH, and NAND
Flash.
As on my own board, as on rsk board NOR flash in on CS0.
So I think I am miss understanding something.
1) Does u-boot a sort
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang
>
> On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
>>
>> In message<4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
>>> The patches are split so that each patch makes only one type of chang
Hi Wolfgang
On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
>
> In message<4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
>>
>> The patches are split so that each patch makes only one type of change,
>> so there's only one thing that needs to be che
Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
In message <4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
>
> The patches are split so that each patch makes only one type of change,
> so there's only one thing that needs to be checked in each patch.
>
> - patches 1 and 2 only make white-spac
Dear Minkyu Kang,
In message <1f3430fb1002060418ydd28583sb6051dd1517fa...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from upper-case
> > to lower-case.
...
> Sorry for late reply.
> I tried to review your patch series,
> but your patch is too confus
Jens Scharsig wrote:
> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs
> This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access
> to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated
> SoC is used.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig
This looks go
Dear Fabio Giovagnini,
In message <201002061124.41572.fabio.giovagn...@aurion-tech.com> you wrote:
>
> I can compile u-boot for rsk7203_config.
> But into the file board/renesas/rsk7203/config.mk
>
> TEXT_BASE = 0x0C7C
>
> and if I read u-boot.srec that is the result of building process I se
Dear linzhavon,
In message <9c4bdd041002060104k2ff29a02mfffa83c15b70a...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
> I try to port U-Boot 2009.11 to s3c2440, something success. as follows:
>
> U-Boot 2009.11 ( 2=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=E6=9C=88 05 2010 - 23:46:51)
>
> DRAM: 64 MB
> Flash: 2 MB
> NAND: NAND_ECC_N
Dear Alessandro Rubini,
In message <20100206080636.ga24...@morgana.gnudd.com> you wrote:
> Mike Frysinger about -delete:
> > i didnt suggest that because it isnt POSIX. it'll break on BSD systems
> > which
> > typically ship with sh*t userland tools.
>
> Actually, I just copied the above line w
Hi Minkyu
On 06/02/2010 12:18, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear kevin.morfitt
>
> 2009/12/29 kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
> :
>> Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from upper-case
>> to lower-case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt
>> ---
>>
>> checkpatch.pl reports no err
Dear kevin.morfitt
2009/12/29 kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
:
> Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from upper-case
> to lower-case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt
> ---
>
> checkpatch.pl reports no errors. MAKEALL ARM9 reports no new warnings
> or errors.
>
> Note
Hi All,
I can compile u-boot for rsk7203_config.
But into the file board/renesas/rsk7203/config.mk
TEXT_BASE = 0x0C7C
and if I read u-boot.srec that is the result of building process I see that
the address spce of the code is starting from 0x0C7C
On my board I have 32 bit SDRAM at such
I try to port U-Boot 2009.11 to s3c2440, something success. as follows:
U-Boot 2009.11 ( 2��月 05 2010 - 23:46:51)
DRAM: 64 MB
Flash: 2 MB
NAND: NAND_ECC_NONE selected by board driver. This is not recommended !!
64 MiB
In:serial
Out: serial
Err: serial
Net: dm9000
---
Mike Frysinger about -delete:
> i didnt suggest that because it isnt POSIX. it'll break on BSD systems which
> typically ship with sh*t userland tools.
Actually, I just copied the above line with "-name *" and stuff
because I know there are portability issues I'm not aware of.
Actually, Git blame
37 matches
Mail list logo
