Dear Peter Pan,
In message <48abf2c21002072147t7e67ba44i4298b39acc5d7...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
> Recently, we had a issue that we need to start more than one board at
> a time. The problem
> we are facing is that every board is using the same u-boot, which
> makes them all have the
> same ma
Hi Tom,
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 15:35, Tom wrote:
>> From: Anders Darander
>>>
>>> Use AT91_GPBR 3 as a bootcount register.
> Please send me a link to the original patch.
> I will take a look
> Tom
Here is the link from Werners patch-status mail:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 05.02.2010 16:02, Tom wrote:
>>
>> Dirk Behme wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep
>>> wrote:
> On 20.01.2010 18:58, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Merge Window closed
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Ben Warren wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> On 2/5/2010 11:30 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
>>
>> On 24.01.2010 01:05, Tom wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote:
>>>
From 9bb1c3501c8f098dac6e224c99e409ebf92b0ab9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Syed Mohammed Khasim
Recently, we had a issue that we need to start more than one board at
a time. The problem
we are facing is that every board is using the same u-boot, which
makes them all have the
same mac address.
Firstly, I think I can gives out a random MAC as we need, but I can
not find any rand() or srand()
f
Dear Naveen Krishna Ch,
On 4 February 2010 14:17, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:
> From: Naveen Krishna CH
>
> The get_pll_clk(int) API returns the PLL frequency based on
> the (int) argument which is defined locally in clock.c
>
> Moving that #define to common header file (clk.h) would
> be helpful w
Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> El Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:54:05PM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
>
>> printf goes to uart1, but it will block forever waiting for
>> busy to go off unless the uart is enabled first.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini
>> ---
>> board/edb93xx/ed
Hi all!
I need enable the support of the new SMSC Ethernet PHY LAN8720 in
AT91SAM based system. Can anybody give me a piece of advice how I can
do it?
Any help is appreciated!
Regards,
Max
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.
Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Premi, Sanjeev
>> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 6:44 PM
>> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Cc: Premi, Sanjeev; Hiremath, Vaibhav
>> Subject: [PATCHv2] OMAP3: Avoid re-write to PRM_CLKSRC_CTRL
>>
>> The function get_osc_clk_speed() is used t
Magnus Lilja wrote:
> Commit f9b6a1575d9f1ca192e4cb60e547aa66f08baa3f, "i.MX31: fix SPI
> driver for shorter than 32 bit" broke 32 bit transfers. This patch
> makes single 32 bit transfer work again.
>
> Transfer lengths that are known not to work will abort and print
> an error message.
>
> Tes
On Sunday 07 February 2010, Tom wrote:
> Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> > 725233: PLD instructions executed with PLD data forwarding
> > enabled can result in a processor deadlock
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka
>
> Please add a detailed comment on the errata.
The short summary is pretty muc
Many many thanks for your answer.
Best regards and good good work.
Alle 19:32, sabato 6 febbraio 2010, Wolfgang Denk ha scritto:
> Dear Fabio Giovagnini,
>
> please read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html - don't
> top post / full quote, please.
>
> In message <201002061654.11412.fab
Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
In message <4b6ec9d5.6060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
>
> Patches 1 and 2 contain only white-space changes and patch 3 contains
> only code style changes (moving external function prototypes to header
> files, removing unused code, making l
hvaib...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Vaibhav Hiremath
>
> Consolidated all SDRC related functions/operations into separate
> file - sdrc.c.
Please add a long comment to explain why this is necessary.
Something like..
'Generalizing omap memory setup is necessary to support the new emif4 interface
that
Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> 725233: PLD instructions executed with PLD data forwarding
> enabled can result in a processor deadlock
>
> Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka
Please add a detailed comment on the errata.
Also looks like this jumping to ROM code.
Can this be done without a ROM code call
Anders Darander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 15:00, Anders Darander
> wrote:
>> From: Anders Darander
>>
>> Use AT91_GPBR 3 as a bootcount register.
>>
>
> As a followup to Werners list of patches not incorporated (from some
> time ago), I'd just like to get a comment on the status
On 07/02/2010 13:38, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang and kevin,
>
> On 6 February 2010 23:24, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>>
>> In message<1f3430fb1002060418ydd28583sb6051dd1517fa...@mail.gmail.com> you
>> wrote:
>>>
Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct member
Dear Wolfgang and kevin,
On 6 February 2010 23:24, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>
> In message <1f3430fb1002060418ydd28583sb6051dd1517fa...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> > Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from upper-case
>> > to lower-case.
> ...
>> Sorry
On 05.02.2010 16:02, Tom wrote:
Dirk Behme wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep
wrote:
On 20.01.2010 18:58, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Merge Window closed, waiting for pull
requests
On 19.01.2010 23:30, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hi
as you proba
19 matches
Mail list logo
