On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:29:26PM +0200, Peter Vollmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding the usage of CPU's with the Freescale ELBC
> nand controller, in my case a MPC8313, and large page NAND (i.e.pagesize =
> 2048+64 bytes, blocksize = 128k):
>
> In nand_spl/nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c
Wolfgang,
These changes also fix a broken build for all nios2 boards due to
a typographic error introduced in the directory restructuring.
The following changes since commit 2a72e9ed18d2164eb7fe569119342eb631b568da:
Stefan Roese (1):
ppc4xx: Add option for PPC440SPe ports without old
Signed-off-by: Scott McNutt
---
arch/nios2/config.mk|2 +
arch/nios2/cpu/u-boot.lds | 135 ++
board/altera/ep1c20/u-boot.lds | 135 --
board/altera/ep1s10/u-boot.lds | 135 --
On 04/16/2010 09:55 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> I'm having trouble with NAND ECC on my OMAP/3530 platform. It
> seems that U-Boot and Linux don't agree on the ECC patterns for
> a given set of data.
>
> In particular, if I create the U-Boot environment in NAND, then
> update it via fw_setconfig in Li
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Kim Phillips
wrote:
> before, MPC8349ITX boots u-boot in 4.3sec:
[snip]
> after, MPC8349ITX boots u-boot in 3.0sec:
Thanks for the good news! Memory POST test on my board with icach
disabled was lasting for hours until I enabled icach locally before
and disabled i
Because of the size of this patch (approx. 350k), here the link
to it:
http://www.denx.de/wiki/pub/U-Boot/TooBigPatches/0001-Move-arch-ppc-to-arch-powerpc-v3.patch
And here the patch description and statistics:
[PATCH v3] Move arch/ppc to arch/powerpc
As discussed on the list, move "arch/ppc"
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Kim Phillips
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:37:08 +0200
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
>> Kim Phillips wrote on 2010-04-08 10:27:03:
>> >
>> > The documentation is confusing: the e300c2 has its FPU chopped off -
>> > the FP registers are simply not there.
>> >
>> >
I'm having trouble with NAND ECC on my OMAP/3530 platform. It
seems that U-Boot and Linux don't agree on the ECC patterns for
a given set of data.
In particular, if I create the U-Boot environment in NAND, then
update it via fw_setconfig in Linux, U-Boot is no longer happy
with the ECC bits.
I n
Hi Anatolij,
On Friday 16 April 2010 16:35:44 Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > [PATCH v2] Move arch/ppc to arch/powerpc
> >
> > As discussed on the list, move "arch/ppc" to "arch/powerpc" to
> > better match the Linux directory structure.
> >
> > Please note that this patch also changes the "ppc" t
Hi,
I removed the changes as you suggested and now it is working without
modifying the code.
Only thing is that I had to add a flag *CONFIG_SYS_WRITE_SWAPPED_DATA* and
it works.
But here I am getting the error in erasing the sector as well in saveenv.
U-Boot $ *saveenv*
Saving Environme
Hi Stefan,
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:37:52 +0200
Stefan Roese wrote:
...
> [PATCH v2] Move arch/ppc to arch/powerpc
>
> As discussed on the list, move "arch/ppc" to "arch/powerpc" to
> better match the Linux directory structure.
>
> Please note that this patch also changes the "ppc" target in
> MA
On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>
>> [PATCH v2] Move arch/ppc to arch/powerpc
>>
>> As discussed on the list, move "arch/ppc" to "arch/powerpc" to
>> better match the Linux directory structure.
>>
>> Please note that this patch also changes the "ppc" target in
>> MAKEALL to "po
> [PATCH v2] Move arch/ppc to arch/powerpc
>
> As discussed on the list, move "arch/ppc" to "arch/powerpc" to
> better match the Linux directory structure.
>
> Please note that this patch also changes the "ppc" target in
> MAKEALL to "powerpc" to match this new infrastructure. But "ppc"
> is kep
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message you
wrote:
>
> The problem with the current structure is that there is no way of
> knowing which $BOARD in board/ uses a particular CPU or SOC. Therefore
So look it up in the Makefile, or in MAKEALL - what's exactly the
problem?
> Exactly - Any code that exists und
Because of the size of this patch (approx. 350k), here the link
to it:
http://www.denx.de/wiki/pub/U-Boot/TooBigPatches/0001-Move-arch-ppc-to-arch-powerpc.patch
And here the patch description and statistics:
[PATCH v2] Move arch/ppc to arch/powerpc
As discussed on the list, move "arch/ppc" to
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
>
> In message
> you wrote:
>>
>> And then there is also
>>
>> board/
>> $BOARDC
>> $BOARDD
>>
>> I've never liked code existing on multiple depths like this. Maybe we move
>> towards:
>
> But we're just about adding e
Hi,
I have a question regarding the usage of CPU's with the Freescale ELBC
nand controller, in my case a MPC8313, and large page NAND (i.e.pagesize =
2048+64 bytes, blocksize = 128k):
In nand_spl/nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c , static void nand_load(unsigned int
offs, int uboot_size, uchar *dst) fir
Hi Stefan,
> Because of the size of this patch (approx. 350k), here the link
> to it:
>
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/pub/U-Boot/TooBigPatches/0001-Move-arch-ppc-to-arch-powerpc.patch
>
> And here the patch description and statistics:
>
>
> [PATCH] Move arch/ppc to arch/powerpc
>
> As discussed on the
From: Michal Simek
Merge cpu and lib cache code.
Flush cache before disabling.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/microblaze/cpu/cache.c | 28 +++
arch/microblaze/lib/Makefile |1 -
arch/microblaze/lib/cache.c | 43 --
Thomas Chou wrote:
> This is a generic approach to port u-boot for nios2 boards.
> You may find the usage of this approach on the nioswiki,
> http://nioswiki.com/DasUBoot
>
> A fpga parameter file, which contains base address information
> and drivers declaration, is generated from Altera's hardwa
Hi All,
here is bunch of microblaze patches.
Thanks for your review,
Micha
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
From: Michal Simek
Move FSL out of interrupt controller.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c |7 ---
arch/microblaze/lib/board.c|7 ++-
.../xilinx/microblaze-generic/microblaze-generic.c |7 +++
3 fi
From: Michal Simek
It is ancient code. There is possible to save several instructions
just if we use offset instead of addik
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/microblaze/cpu/irq.S | 182 +++-
1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
diff
From: Michal Simek
I would like to handle case where system doesn't contain
intc that's why I need timer initialization out of intc code.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c |6 --
arch/microblaze/cpu/timer.c |3 ++-
arch/microblaze/lib/board.c
From: Michal Simek
WB cache use different instruction that WT cache but the major code
is that same. That means that wdc.flush on system with WT cache
do the same thing as before.
You need newer toolchain with wdc.flush support.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/microblaze/lib/cache.c |
From: Michal Simek
It is better to read ivr and react on it than do long parsing from
two regs. Interrupt controller returs actual irq number.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c | 28 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-
From: Michal Simek
env_relocation should be called first.
Added stdio_init too.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/microblaze/lib/board.c | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/lib/board.c b/arch/microblaze/lib/board.c
index 41a
From: Michal Simek
There is used max cache size on system which doesn't define
cache size.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/microblaze/lib/bootm.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/lib/bootm.c b/arch/microblaze/lib/bootm.c
index
From: Michal Simek
It is more accurate to show that caches are OFF instead of FAIL.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/microblaze/lib/board.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/lib/board.c b/arch/microblaze/lib/board.c
index 1d44a64..4
Arun Bhanu wrote:
> This patch adds FDT (flattened device tree) support to microblaze arch.
>
> Tested with Linux arch/microblaze kernels with and without compiled in
> FDT on Xilinx ML506 board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Bhanu
Applied.
Thanks,
Michal
> ---
> arch/microblaze/lib/bootm.c | 39
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <201004141036.29317...@denx.de> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 8d321b81c5441db93425ee37cb79cc51d9ce2fb0:
> Peter Tyser (1):
> Update README to reflect new directory structure
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx
Dear Alessandro Rubini,
In message <20100416065842.ga21...@morgana.gnudd.com> you wrote:
>
> > I really like this structure, particularly if the code under
> > $VENDOR/[common, include, lib] is arch independent.
>
> Yes, that would be good, if it was a common case. However,
> arch-independent co
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message you
wrote:
>
> And then there is also
>
> board/
> $BOARDC
> $BOARDD
>
> I've never liked code existing on multiple depths like this. Maybe we move
> towards:
But we're just about adding exactly such multi-depth structures to
the CPU directory (see recent disc
Hi Wolfgang,
On Friday 16 April 2010 09:33:06 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > [PATCH] Move arch/ppc to arch/powerpc
> >
> > As discussed on the list, move "arch/ppc" to "arch/powerpc" to
> > better match the Linux directory structure.
> >
> > Please note that this patch also changes the "ppc" target in
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <201004160921.44401...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Because of the size of this patch (approx. 350k), here the link
> to it:
>
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/pub/U-Boot/TooBigPatches/0001-Move-arch-ppc-to-arch-powerpc.patch
>
> And here the patch description and statistics:
>
Because of the size of this patch (approx. 350k), here the link
to it:
http://www.denx.de/wiki/pub/U-Boot/TooBigPatches/0001-Move-arch-ppc-to-arch-powerpc.patch
And here the patch description and statistics:
[PATCH] Move arch/ppc to arch/powerpc
As discussed on the list, move "arch/ppc" to "ar
36 matches
Mail list logo
