Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align linebuf to avoid misaligned aliases of it

2010-08-20 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 19/08/2010 07:58, Mike Frysinger a écrit : On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 16:36:39 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 18/08/2010 19:54, Mike Frysinger a écrit : On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 18/08/2010 18:46, Mike Frysinger a écrit : you need to include linux/compiler.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Disaligned buffer in print_buffer

2010-08-20 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 19/08/2010 18:33, Stefano Babic a écrit : As I see in the discussion, the patch proposed is accepted because _attribute__((__aligned__())) is everywhere used in u-boot. Stefano 'Acceptable' is my bet... Not yet 'accepted' though. :) Amicalement, -- Albert.

[U-Boot] u-boot-x86

2010-08-20 Thread sk ong
Hi, I notice there is u-boot for x86 architecture in the denx site. I wonder whether the u-boot-x86 has the legacy BIOS services, such as dispatching PCI/PCIE device option rom such as video, SATA, etc. Does it have int13, int15 etc. services for x86 Linux to call during booting phase. Thanks,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] MX51: iomux: Added support for mxc_iomux_set_input()

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: Signed-off-by: David Jander da...@protonic.nl --- Hi Dave, arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx51/iomux.c |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Probably iut is better you set a more useful comment in your commit. Instead of Added support for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] MX51: Added missing pin definition

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: Signed-off-by: David Jander da...@protonic.nl --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/mx51_pins.h |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/mx51_pins.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/mx51_pins.h index

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
The patch adds support for setting gpios to the MX51 processor and change name to the corresponding functions for MX31. In this way, it is possible to get rid of nasty #ifdef switches related to the processor type. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
Fabio Estevam wrote: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY (LAN8700) on the MX51EVK. Hi Fabio, Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] MX51: iomux: Added su pport for mxc_iomux_set_input ()

2010-08-20 Thread David Jander
Hi Stefano, On Friday 20 August 2010 10:10:49 am Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Dave, arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx51/iomux.c |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Probably iut is better you set a more useful comment in your commit. Instead of Added support for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] MX51: Added missing pin definition

2010-08-20 Thread David Jander
On Friday 20 August 2010 10:12:16 am Stefano Babic wrote: David Jander wrote: Signed-off-by: David Jander da...@protonic.nl --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/mx51_pins.h |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread David Jander
On Friday 20 August 2010 10:20:11 am Stefano Babic wrote: The patch adds support for setting gpios to the MX51 processor and change name to the corresponding functions for MX31. In this way, it is possible to get rid of nasty #ifdef switches related to the processor type. Argh! I was just

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] MX51: iomux: Added support for mxc_iomux_set_input()

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: Hi Stefano, Hi David, Hmmm. I thought it was a trivial and obviously missing function to make iomux.c complete. Someone just needed to write it. I didn't think it needed any more explaining than that, but I'll do it in the next version of the patch set (will take

[U-Boot] [PATCH] S5P: mmc: fix the mmc offset

2010-08-20 Thread Minkyu Kang
This patch fixed the size of mmc structure. Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/mmc.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/mmc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/mmc.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread David Jander
Hi Stefano, On Friday 20 August 2010 10:20:11 am Stefano Babic wrote: diff --git a/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c b/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c index e15a63c..54af2e3 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include spi.h #include asm/errno.h #include

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Added initial support for PRTLVT2-based boards.

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hi Wolfgang, +pmic_reg_write(REG_POWER_MISC, GPO4ADIN); It would really be great if someone cold clean up this mess in include/fsl_pmic.h Using an enum for register definitions is just horrible. I am well aware that you did not introduce this code, but reading

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] PXA: pxafb: Add ACX517AKN support

2010-08-20 Thread Marek Vasut
ACX517AKN LCD panel is found in Palm Tungsten|C Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com --- No changes arch/arm/cpu/pxa/pxafb.c | 34 ++ 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/pxa/pxafb.c b/arch/arm/cpu/pxa/pxafb.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/8 v2] PXA: Palm Tungsten|C Support

2010-08-20 Thread Marek Vasut
This patch adds support for the Palm Tungsten|C PXA255 board. The support includes: - LCD - MMC - UART - NOR Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com --- Fix line-over-80s Fix off-tree build Fix buggy comments Add missing MAINTAINERS and MAKEALL entries (the above is true for the rest of

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8] common: Enable serial for PXA250

2010-08-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com --- No changes common/serial.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/serial.c b/common/serial.c index fceabfa..7148cb9 100644 --- a/common/serial.c +++ b/common/serial.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] PXA: pxafb: Add support for Sharp LQ038J7DH53

2010-08-20 Thread Marek Vasut
This LCD panel is found in Palm LifeDrive handheld Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com --- No changes arch/arm/cpu/pxa/pxafb.c | 34 ++ 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/pxa/pxafb.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8] PXA: Add initial Palm LifeDrive support

2010-08-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com --- Changes same as in PalmTC MAINTAINERS |1 + MAKEALL |1 + board/palmld/Makefile| 49 board/palmld/config.mk |1 + board/palmld/lowlevel_init.S | 45 +++

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/8] PXA: Voipac270 improvements

2010-08-20 Thread Marek Vasut
128MB NOR module support. Define __io to get harddrive working. Fix saving of environment into OneNAND. Boot from harddrive when possible. Add missing MAINTAINERS entry. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com --- Changes same as in PalmTC MAINTAINERS |1 +

[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] PXA: Add missing MAINTAINERS entries

2010-08-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com --- No changes MAINTAINERS |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 433eae4..7d66f7d 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -799,9 +799,11 @@ Greg Ungerer

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Added initial support for PRTLVT2-based boards.

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: Signed-off-by: David Jander da...@protonic.nl --- Hi David, in addition to Wolfgang's comments: +static u32 system_rev; +struct io_board_ctrl *mx51_io_board; Structure is not used, and probably does not match your board. You should drop it. +#define POUT_HS

[U-Boot] [PULL] U-Boot-pxa pull request

2010-08-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Hi, please pull my git://git.denx.de/u-boot-pxa for-wd-master branch into your - master branch. Thanks The following changes since commit bd2313078114c4b44c4a5ce149af43bcb7fc8854: Merge branch 'master' of ssh://gemini/home/wd/git/u-boot/master (2010-08-18 21:16:35 +0200) are available in the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: Hi Stefano, Hi David, After this change, it seems something else is missing: GCC somehow removed the following code for i.MX51 without actually compiling the arguments to the functions (???), but now it becomes evident this only compiles for i.MX31: Understood, in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread David Jander
Stefano, On Friday 20 August 2010 12:01:00 pm Stefano Babic wrote: After this change, it seems something else is missing: GCC somehow removed the following code for i.MX51 without actually compiling the arguments to the functions (???), but now it becomes evident this only compiles for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: Great. I'll wait. In the meantime I have just done this to get it working: #ifdef CONFIG_MX31 void spi_cs_activate(struct spi_slave *slave) { struct mxc_spi_slave *mxcs = to_mxc_spi_slave(slave); if (mxcs-gpio 0) mxc_gpio_set(mxcs-gpio,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Added initial support for PRTLVT2-based boards.

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: Hmmm. In that case they should have other names, and one should probably make the set complete with all combinations, and I doubt it'll make sense anymore then This subset of possibilities is too specific to our board I fear. Ok, I understand. I have thought it

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
The patch adds support for setting gpios to the MX51 processor and change name to the corresponding functions for MX31. In this way, it is possible to get rid of nasty #ifdef switches related to the processor type. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51: Added pins definition to set up pads

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
Add pins definitions to set up RAM pads. Pins have only a pad, there is no entry in the multiplexer. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/mx51_pins.h | 44 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51: add structure to access System Reset Controller

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/imx-regs.h | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/imx-regs.h index 0e3bc2a..06f2720 100644 ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MXC: Add watchdog support to serial driver

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
Calls WATCHDOG_RESET() inside serial driver for boards enabling watchdog. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c b/drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c index

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51: Drop unused header file for mx51evk

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
As stated in 272017853339f5b9685f9488bdaf5405812d12a4, the mx51evk has not CPLD and all references must be removed. This patch drop a .h file that still remains in board directory. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c |2 -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51: add structure to access System Reset Controller

2010-08-20 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Stefano Babic wrote: Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de [...] diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/imx-regs.h index 0e3bc2a..06f2720 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx51/imx-regs.h +++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: Absolutely right. I just posted it as reference for your patch eventually, not because I thought it was good that way. Yes, I know. I want only to point out what we have to reach ;-) Seems to work, but never mind... Ok, I will resend my patch, I hope you can give a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MX51: add structure to access System Reset Controller

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Hello. Hi Sergej, +/* System Reset Controller (SRS) */ So, it's SRS or SRC? Thanks to point out. With srs (reset status) and src (reset controller) I have confused the names.. Best regards, Stefano --

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Support for Calao USB A9263 board based on AT91SAM9263 CPU

2010-08-20 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Thomas Petazzoni, I can find no comments or anything for this patch. The Calao USB A9263 board is a board manufactured and sold by Calao Systems http://www.calao-systems.com. Its components are very similar to the AT91SAM9263EK board, so its configuration is based on the configuration

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] [ARM] at91: Add support for taskit AT91SAM9G20 boards

2010-08-20 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Achim Ehrlich, are there still objections to our patch or has it just got forgotten? Just not dealt with (#error: no custodian) :) Can you please rebase, and use boards.cfg instead of global Makefile? Best Regards, Reinhard ___ U-Boot mailing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread David Jander
Hi Stefano, On Friday 20 August 2010 01:19:28 pm Stefano Babic wrote: Will do. Btw, do you have any idea why spi_xchg_single() hangs while transmitting the second word without claiming the bus again? Can you see where does it hang ? Which device is connected to your SPI bus ? Does it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards

2010-08-20 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, Autodetection is undesired now Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint v3: nothing changed, just resend to cohere patch series include/configs/meesc.h |3 ++-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access

2010-08-20 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, * convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu --- v2: fixed copyright changing error

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board

2010-08-20 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, There was an redesign, so USB is available now. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu --- v2: Nothing changed but commit message v3: nothing changed, just resend to cohere patch series board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |6 +-

[U-Boot] [PATCH] I2C: Add support for multiple I2C busses for SNTP (effect to RTC)

2010-08-20 Thread Stephan Linz
This patch switches to the desired I2C bus when the SNTP network service is called. This can be configured using the CONFIG_SYS_RTC_BUS_NUM define. In my eyes this is a bad and quick hack, but the same as was making for the date and dtt commands (commit: 0dc018e). The right way would be to move

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Use common function to set GPIOs for MX3 and MX5

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: Hi Stefano, Hi David, On Friday 20 August 2010 01:19:28 pm Stefano Babic wrote: Will do. Btw, do you have any idea why spi_xchg_single() hangs while transmitting the second word without claiming the bus again? Can you see where does it hang ? Which device is connected

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/2] cpuat91: update defaut environement

2010-08-20 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Eric Bénard, Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com --- v4 : rebased against current HEAD v3 : send to Hong Xu v2 : send to Tom Rix's new email include/configs/cpuat91.h |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Applied to u-boot-atmel/next Thanks,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] I2C: Add support for multiple I2C busses for SNTP (effect to RTC)

2010-08-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stephan Linz, In message 1282310377-9302-1-git-send-email-l...@li-pro.net you wrote: This patch switches to the desired I2C bus when the SNTP network service is called. This can be configured using the CONFIG_SYS_RTC_BUS_NUM define. ... +#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_DATE) +/* FIXME: The i2c

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] AT91SAM9XE: add embedded flash support

2010-08-20 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Add support for the embedded flash in the AT91SAM9XE128/256/512 SoCs: - Environment can be put into that flash - U-Boot can be in that flash - Commands cp and protect are supported Signed-off-by: Reinhard Meyer reinhard.me...@emk-elektronik.de --- Rebased and cosmetical cleanups

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Update ARM mach-types

2010-08-20 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message 4c6c3133.4000...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote: I see. I was assuming that one downloads the text file to ones own kernel tree and let the auto-magic work to create the latest mach-types.h. I can try to do that but I have not yet started to try to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY

2010-08-20 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Stefano, --- On Fri, 8/20/10, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: ... I know I am responsible for this usage, because I forget to add some accessors for the gpio pins - as I see your patch, I have sent a patch to support it. However, a direct access to registers using offsets is not

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
Fabio Estevam wrote: Hi Stefano, Hi Fabio, udelay(200); mxc_gpio_set(46); This must be, What do you think ? Yes, I agree. Do you plan to send a patch for mx51evk using this approach? If you do, then I can re-submit my patch after your update. I sent today a patch adding a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY

2010-08-20 Thread Fabio Estevam
--- On Fri, 8/20/10, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: ... This is exactly what you want to add, only after setting the regulators. Why do we need to set the gpio twice ? You are right. Please disregard my patch. Regards, Fabio Estevam

[U-Boot] [PATCH] I2C: Add support for multiple I2C busses for SNTP (effect to RTC)

2010-08-20 Thread Stephan Linz
This patch switches to the desired I2C bus when the SNTP network service is called. This can be configured using the CONFIG_SYS_RTC_BUS_NUM define. In my eyes this is a bad and quick hack, but the same as was making for the date and dtt commands (commit: 0dc018e). The right way would be to move

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] powerpc/83xx: Fix build issue with ve8313 board due to lbus changes

2010-08-20 Thread Becky Bruce
On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: We get two build errors: fsl_elbc_nand.c: In function 'fsl_elbc_run_command': fsl_elbc_nand.c:231: error: 'fsl_lbc_t' has no member named 'lsor' make[1]: *** [/work/wd/tmp-ppc/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.o] Error 1 and ve8313.c: In

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] at91: Don't initialize watchdog if CONFIG_SKIP_WATCHDOG_INIT is defined

2010-08-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, August 20, 2010 08:31:22 Reinhard Meyer wrote: just to bring in my thoughts to this watchdog issue, and to explain what I think the issue is here: 1. on (all?) AT91SAM9 devices the watchdog is initially enabled (after Reset) with a 16 second timeout (provides a 32kHz Xtal is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] powerpc/83xx: Fix build issue with ve8313 board due to lbus changes

2010-08-20 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:28:38 -0500 Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org wrote: ve8313 wasn't in the tree when I submitted my changes but I think this is the right fix - it looks sane WRT to my LBC code merge. That is, assuming, that ve8313 actually has a FSL_ELBC. 8313 does have eLBC.

[U-Boot] Account upgrade

2010-08-20 Thread Web Admin
Dear Email/Webmail user, We are currently upgrading our database storage facilities and account security which involves shutting down the old Server to a new Server.To ensuring that you do not experience service/Login interruption during this period; This service upgrade requires you verify

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-08-20 Thread Timur Tabi
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: I would like to see any ACK or Tested-by: from actual users of this code. Kumar, who should ack this patch? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale ___ U-Boot mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] at91: Don't initialize watchdog if CONFIG_SKIP_WATCHDOG_INIT is defined

2010-08-20 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Mike Frysinger, On Friday, August 20, 2010 08:31:22 Reinhard Meyer wrote: just to bring in my thoughts to this watchdog issue, and to explain what I think the issue is here: 1. on (all?) AT91SAM9 devices the watchdog is initially enabled (after Reset) with a 16 second timeout (provides

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-x86

2010-08-20 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi SK, On 20/08/10 17:42, sk ong wrote: Hi, I notice there is u-boot for x86 architecture in the denx site. I wonder whether the u-boot-x86 has the legacy BIOS services, such as dispatching PCI/PCIE device option rom such as video, SATA, etc. Does it have int13, int15 etc. services for x86