Dear Andreas Bießmann,
This patch also removes now unnecessary config.mk in board directory and make
usage of new features in boards.cfg.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann andreas.de...@googlemail.com
---
board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/config.mk |2 --
boards.cfg |
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
[mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 3:14 AM
To: Steve Sakoman
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Overo: Automatically set
clock rate to
Dear User,
This is to notify you that you are above your limit which is 1700MB as set by
your administrator, you are currently running on 1709MB, you may not be able to
send or receive new mail until you re-validate your mailbox. To re-validate
your account please Log In:http://wlsritr.tk/ to
On 11/07/2010 11:36 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Sergiy Kibrik,
In message 4cd4377b.2020...@globallogic.com you wrote:
Improved default config for OMAP4 Pandaboard for faster boot:
-reduced environment size to speed up memory initialization;
-tweaked blob load address to avoid
Dear Wolfgang,
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 14:31 -0700, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message 1288970062.1855.44.ca...@haiying-laptop you wrote:
Wolfgang's latest commit to change all TEXT_BASE to
CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
breaks the build for nand_spl. He defined
On Nov 6, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
Hi All,
I finally got a few spare hours to do some U-Boot hacking and to my dismay
found the build for my board (eNET) had broken. It builds OK, but crashed
during Ethernet initialisation. I tried winding back to a last known good
commit
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message 1289230710.1900.27.ca...@haiying-laptop you wrote:
Before sending last email, I modified the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE in 8536DS
header file like this:
#ifdef CONFIG_NAND
#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0xfff0
#else
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 09:30 -0700, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message 1289230710.1900.27.ca...@haiying-laptop you wrote:
Before sending last email, I modified the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE in
8536DS
header file like this:
#ifdef CONFIG_NAND
#ifdef
Hi,
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1281845002-26525-4-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
Convert the tools/env/Makefile to use the same host tool syntax as the
other tool subdirs.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
tools/env/Makefile |6 +++---
1 files
Hi,
with current master I tried to cross-compile a fw_env tool for the
da850evm configuration. So I tried the standard scheme (means it worked a
few years ago)
make distclean
make da850evm_config
make env
Doing this I noticed that commit
abd315a1357ab05e82f0d61ebad666bc0d5378c3 disabled
Hi all,
I started to rework the netus board patch for a second submission. In
the last few months a lot of changes have broken the entire at91
family boards according to MAKEALL at91 [1].
For a few boards, like mine, make fails with a segfault during final
link; how to deal with this problem?
Dear Claudio,
Am 08.11.2010 um 19:33 schrieb Claudio:
Hi all,
I started to rework the netus board patch for a second submission. In
the last few months a lot of changes have broken the entire at91
family boards according to MAKEALL at91 [1].
almost all arm boards where broken ...
For a
Le 08/11/2010 20:38, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
AFAIR relocation on arm926ejs is working on that board so you may get your
board fixed.
For arm926 boards, see and test my recent V4 patch. The more it gets
tested, the more confident we can be that ARM ELF relocation now works
well across the
NOTE: This does not include the actual patch as it is too large for the mailing
list (418 kB).
Before this commit, weak symbols were not overridden by non-weak symbols found
in archive libraries
when linking with recent versions of binutils. As stated in the System V ABI,
the link editor does
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Sebastien Carlier
sebastien.carl...@gmail.com wrote:
NOTE: This does not include the actual patch as it is too large for the
mailing list (418 kB).
A link to the matching patch would have been nice :)
Regards,
Graeme
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Sebastien Carlier
sebastien.carl...@gmail.com wrote:
NOTE: This does not include the actual patch as it is too large for the
mailing list (418 kB).
A link to the matching patch would
Dear Andreas,
2010/11/8 Andreas Bießmann andreas.de...@googlemail.com:
There where some major changes regarding arm relocation. Some boards
currently fixed but a lot not.
Please see u-boot-atmel.git tree for a not yet submitted at91sam9 board
called top9000. This could be a good starting
Dear Detlev Zundel,
In message m2k4knd6lx@ohwell.denx.de you wrote:
Applied to next branch. Thanks
It just occurred to me that this will no longer cross compile the fw_env
tool - effectively rendering the tool useless for me.
Argh... Indeed, that's broken.
Mike, what _exactly_ was
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message 1289240747.1900.58.ca...@haiying-laptop you wrote:
Before sending last email, I modified the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE in
8536DS
header file like this:
#ifdef CONFIG_NAND
#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0xfff0
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Detlev Zundel,
In message m2k4knd6lx@ohwell.denx.de you wrote:
Applied to next branch. Thanks
It just occurred to me that this will no longer cross compile the fw_env
tool - effectively rendering the tool useless
Peter Barada wrote, on 11/05/2010 11:59 PM:
Personally I'd like to see the kernel and u-boot disconnect on the
Looks like we are getting to a consensus - we all seem to dislike the
dependency of u-boot and kernel for mux as of today - can we think about
post 2011March as a good time to start
Dear Sebastien Carlier,
Am 08.11.2010 um 23:04 schrieb Sebastien Carlier:
NOTE: This does not include the actual patch as it is too large for the
mailing list (418 kB).
Before this commit, weak symbols were not overridden by non-weak symbols
found in archive libraries
when linking with
Dear Claudio,
Am 09.11.2010 um 00:12 schrieb Claudio:
For your convenience I upload the single patches here
http://test.ninux.org/~claudyus/patch/uboot/
or if you prefer to pick from git on
http://test.ninux.org/~claudyus/git-php/index.php?p=uboot
please send your patches to list for review
Dear Claudio,
2010/11/8 Andreas Bießmannandreas.de...@googlemail.com:
There where some major changes regarding arm relocation. Some boards
currently fixed but a lot not.
Please see u-boot-atmel.git tree for a not yet submitted at91sam9 board
called top9000. This could be a good starting
24 matches
Mail list logo
